 |
PDBsum entry 2c7e
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Cell cycle
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Revised atomic structure fitting into a groel(d398a)-atp7 cryo-em map (emd 1047)
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
60 kda chaperonin. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n. Synonym: groel, protein cpn60, groel protein. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
40mer (from
)
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
N.A.Ranson,G.W.Farr,A.M.Roseman,B.Gowen,W.A.Fenton,A.L.Horwich, H.R.Saibil
|
Key ref:
|
 |
N.A.Ranson
et al.
(2001).
ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy.
Cell,
107,
869-879.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
22-Nov-05
|
Release date:
|
16-Feb-06
|
|
|
Supersedes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P0A6F5
(CH60_ECOLI) -
Chaperonin GroEL from Escherichia coli (strain K12)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
548 a.a.
525 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 2 residue positions (black
crosses)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.5.6.1.7
- chaperonin ATPase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide = ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ATP
Bound ligand (Het Group name = )
corresponds exactly
|
+
|
H2O
|
+
|
folded polypeptide
|
=
|
ADP
|
+
|
phosphate
|
+
|
unfolded polypeptide
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Cell
107:869-879
(2001)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy.
|
|
N.A.Ranson,
G.W.Farr,
A.M.Roseman,
B.Gowen,
W.A.Fenton,
A.L.Horwich,
H.R.Saibil.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The chaperonin GroEL drives its protein-folding cycle by cooperatively binding
ATP to one of its two rings, priming that ring to become folding-active upon
GroES binding, while simultaneously discharging the previous folding chamber
from the opposite ring. The GroEL-ATP structure, determined by cryo-EM and
atomic structure fitting, shows that the intermediate domains rotate downward,
switching their intersubunit salt bridge contacts from substrate binding to ATP
binding domains. These observations, together with the effects of ATP binding to
a GroEL-GroES-ADP complex, suggest structural models for the ATP-induced
reduction in affinity for polypeptide and for cooperativity. The model for
cooperativity, based on switching of intersubunit salt bridge interactions
around the GroEL ring, may provide general insight into cooperativity in other
ring complexes and molecular machines.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Intersubunit Contacts(a) A closeup view of the
intermediate domain orientation in the unliganded T ring of
GroEL-ATP.(b) A similar view of the intermediate domain
orientation in the ATP-bound R ring. The equatorial (green),
intermediate (yellow), and apical (red) domains of parts of two
adjacent subunits are shown inside a blue/yellow wire mesh
surface representing the EM density. The change in color of the
mesh indicates the boundary between the two subunits in each
view. The T ring contains density at the E386-R197 salt bridge.
In the R ring, E386 makes a new contact near K80 and D83 in the
neighboring equatorial domain.
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Domain Twisting Caused by ATP Binding to the Open
Ring of GroEL-GroES-ADPCryo-EM structure to 12.5 Å
resolution of the GroES-ADP[7]-GroEL-ATP[7] complex isolated
from a reaction mixture. The cryo-EM map is shown as a blue
transparent surface, with the atomic structure docked in. The
GroEL domains are colored as in Figure 2, and GroES is cyan. The
precision of the fit is demonstrated by the side view (a). The
white circle in (a) indicates the position of the R197-E386
contact. The free apical domains (lower ring in [a]) are docked
into the end view (b) with a counterclockwise rotation of
20° ± 5°. The white dotted lines are orientation
markers for comparison of the apical rotation here with that in
Figure 3a.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Cell
(2001,
107,
869-879)
copyright 2001.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.L.Lawson,
M.L.Baker,
C.Best,
C.Bi,
M.Dougherty,
P.Feng,
G.van Ginkel,
B.Devkota,
I.Lagerstedt,
S.J.Ludtke,
R.H.Newman,
T.J.Oldfield,
I.Rees,
G.Sahni,
R.Sala,
S.Velankar,
J.Warren,
J.D.Westbrook,
K.Henrick,
G.J.Kleywegt,
H.M.Berman,
and
W.Chiu
(2011).
EMDataBank.org: unified data resource for CryoEM.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
39,
D456-D464.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.A.Frank,
M.Goomanovsky,
A.Davidi,
G.Ziv,
A.Horovitz,
and
G.Haran
(2010).
Out-of-equilibrium conformational cycling of GroEL under saturating ATP concentrations.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
6270-6274.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Lasker,
A.Sali,
and
H.J.Wolfson
(2010).
Determining macromolecular assembly structures by molecular docking and fitting into an electron density map.
|
| |
Proteins,
78,
3205-3211.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.P.Aryal,
T.Ju,
and
R.D.Cummings
(2010).
The endoplasmic reticulum chaperone Cosmc directly promotes in vitro folding of T-synthase.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
2456-2462.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Zhang,
D.Vasishtan,
M.Xu,
M.Topf,
and
F.Alber
(2010).
A fast mathematical programming procedure for simultaneous fitting of assembly components into cryoEM density maps.
|
| |
Bioinformatics,
26,
i261-i268.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Li,
Z.Zheng,
A.Ramsey,
and
L.Chen
(2010).
Analysis of peptides and proteins in their binding to GroEL.
|
| |
J Pept Sci,
16,
693-700.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Bonshtien,
A.Parnas,
R.Sharkia,
A.Niv,
I.Mizrahi,
A.Azem,
and
C.Weiss
(2009).
Differential effects of co-chaperonin homologs on cpn60 oligomers.
|
| |
Cell Stress Chaperones,
14,
509-519.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Horwich,
and
W.A.Fenton
(2009).
Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding.
|
| |
Q Rev Biophys,
42,
83.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.M.Lu,
and
J.Liang
(2009).
Perturbation-based Markovian transmission model for probing allosteric dynamics of large macromolecular assembling: a study of GroEL-GroES.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
5,
e1000526.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Lasker,
M.Topf,
A.Sali,
and
H.J.Wolfson
(2009).
Inferential optimization for simultaneous fitting of multiple components into a CryoEM map of their assembly.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
388,
180-194.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.K.Tyagi,
W.A.Fenton,
and
A.L.Horwich
(2009).
GroEL/GroES cycling: ATP binds to an open ring before substrate protein favoring protein binding and production of the native state.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
20264-20269.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Medalia,
A.Beer,
P.Zwickl,
O.Mihalache,
M.Beck,
O.Medalia,
and
A.Navon
(2009).
Architecture and molecular mechanism of PAN, the archaeal proteasome regulatory ATPase.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
22952-22960.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.T.Loh,
and
V.Elser
(2009).
Reconstruction algorithm for single-particle diffraction imaging experiments.
|
| |
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys,
80,
026705.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Yang,
P.Májek,
and
I.Bahar
(2009).
Allosteric transitions of supramolecular systems explored by network models: application to chaperonin GroEL.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
5,
e1000360.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.C.Jolley,
S.A.Wells,
P.Fromme,
and
M.F.Thorpe
(2008).
Fitting low-resolution cryo-EM maps of proteins using constrained geometric simulations.
|
| |
Biophys J,
94,
1613-1621.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.H.Chen,
K.Luke,
J.Zhang,
W.Chiu,
and
P.Wittung-Stafshede
(2008).
Location and flexibility of the unique C-terminal tail of Aquifex aeolicus co-chaperonin protein 10 as derived by cryo-electron microscopy and biophysical techniques.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
381,
707-717.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.K.Clare,
S.Stagg,
J.Quispe,
G.W.Farr,
A.L.Horwich,
and
H.R.Saibil
(2008).
Multiple states of a nucleotide-bound group 2 chaperonin.
|
| |
Structure,
16,
528-534.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Madan,
Z.Lin,
and
H.S.Rye
(2008).
Triggering Protein Folding within the GroEL-GroES Complex.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
32003-32013.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Chapman,
G.W.Farr,
W.A.Fenton,
S.M.Johnson,
and
A.L.Horwich
(2008).
Requirement for binding multiple ATPs to convert a GroEL ring to the folding-active state.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
19205-19210.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Okuda,
C.Sakuhana,
R.Yamamoto,
Y.Mizukami,
R.Kawai,
Y.Sumita,
M.Koga,
M.Shirai,
and
K.Matsuda
(2008).
The intermediate domain defines broad nucleotide selectivity for protein folding in Chlamydophila GroEL1.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
9300-9307.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.I.Sułkowska,
A.Kloczkowski,
T.Z.Sen,
M.Cieplak,
and
R.L.Jernigan
(2008).
Predicting the order in which contacts are broken during single molecule protein stretching experiments.
|
| |
Proteins,
71,
45-60.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Grason,
J.S.Gresham,
and
G.H.Lorimer
(2008).
Setting the chaperonin timer: a two-stroke, two-speed, protein machine.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
17339-17344.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Hosono,
T.Ueno,
H.Taguchi,
F.Motojima,
T.Zako,
M.Yoshida,
and
T.Funatsu
(2008).
Kinetic Analysis of Conformational Changes of GroEL Based on the Fluorescence of Tyrosine 506.
|
| |
Protein J,
27,
461-468.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Nagayama,
and
R.Danev
(2008).
Phase contrast electron microscopy: development of thin-film phase plates and biological applications.
|
| |
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci,
363,
2153-2162.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Nagayama
(2008).
Development of phase plates for electron microscopes and their biological application.
|
| |
Eur Biophys J,
37,
345-358.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Rusu,
S.Birmanns,
and
W.Wriggers
(2008).
Biomolecular pleiomorphism probed by spatial interpolation of coarse models.
|
| |
Bioinformatics,
24,
2460-2466.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.D.Thomsen,
and
J.M.Berger
(2008).
Structural frameworks for considering microbial protein- and nucleic acid-dependent motor ATPases.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
69,
1071-1090.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Cui,
and
M.Karplus
(2008).
Allostery and cooperativity revisited.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
17,
1295-1307.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Mosca,
B.Brannetti,
and
T.R.Schneider
(2008).
Alignment of protein structures in the presence of domain motions.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
9,
352.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.M.Stagg,
G.C.Lander,
J.Quispe,
N.R.Voss,
A.Cheng,
H.Bradlow,
S.Bradlow,
B.Carragher,
and
C.S.Potter
(2008).
A test-bed for optimizing high-resolution single particle reconstructions.
|
| |
J Struct Biol,
163,
29-39.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Kawabata
(2008).
Multiple subunit fitting into a low-resolution density map of a macromolecular complex using a gaussian mixture model.
|
| |
Biophys J,
95,
4643-4658.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Sameshima,
T.Ueno,
R.Iizuka,
N.Ishii,
N.Terada,
K.Okabe,
and
T.Funatsu
(2008).
Football- and Bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES Complexes Coexist during the Reaction Cycle.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
23765-23773.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Frankenstein,
J.Sperling,
R.Sperling,
and
M.Eisenstein
(2008).
FitEM2EM--tools for low resolution study of macromolecular assembly and dynamics.
|
| |
PLoS ONE,
3,
e3594.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Horwich,
W.A.Fenton,
E.Chapman,
and
G.W.Farr
(2007).
Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
23,
115-145.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.van der Vaart,
and
M.Karplus
(2007).
Minimum free energy pathways and free energy profiles for conformational transitions based on atomistic molecular dynamics simulations.
|
| |
J Chem Phys,
126,
164106.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Jacob,
A.Horovitz,
and
R.Unger
(2007).
Different mechanistic requirements for prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins: a lattice study.
|
| |
Bioinformatics,
23,
i240-i248.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Stan,
G.H.Lorimer,
D.Thirumalai,
and
B.R.Brooks
(2007).
Coupling between allosteric transitions in GroEL and assisted folding of a substrate protein.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
8803-8808.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.D.Kiser,
D.T.Lodowski,
and
K.Palczewski
(2007).
Purification, crystallization and structure determination of native GroEL from Escherichia coli lacking bound potassium ions.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
63,
457-461.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Reissmann,
C.Parnot,
C.R.Booth,
W.Chiu,
and
J.Frydman
(2007).
Essential function of the built-in lid in the allosteric regulation of eukaryotic and archaeal chaperonins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
14,
432-440.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Zheng,
B.R.Brooks,
and
D.Thirumalai
(2007).
Allosteric transitions in the chaperonin GroEL are captured by a dominant normal mode that is most robust to sequence variations.
|
| |
Biophys J,
93,
2289-2299.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Sliozberg,
and
C.F.Abrams
(2007).
Spontaneous conformational changes in the E. coli GroEL subunit from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
|
| |
Biophys J,
93,
1906-1916.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.C.Deocaris,
S.C.Kaul,
and
R.Wadhwa
(2006).
On the brotherhood of the mitochondrial chaperones mortalin and heat shock protein 60.
|
| |
Cell Stress Chaperones,
11,
116-128.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Hyeon,
G.H.Lorimer,
and
D.Thirumalai
(2006).
Dynamics of allosteric transitions in GroEL.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
18939-18944.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.H.Chen,
J.L.Song,
D.T.Chuang,
W.Chiu,
and
S.J.Ludtke
(2006).
An expanded conformation of single-ring GroEL-GroES complex encapsulates an 86 kDa substrate.
|
| |
Structure,
14,
1711-1722.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Lindahl,
C.Azuara,
P.Koehl,
and
M.Delarue
(2006).
NOMAD-Ref: visualization, deformation and refinement of macromolecular structures based on all-atom normal mode analysis.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
34,
W52-W56.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Suhre,
J.Navaza,
and
Y.H.Sanejouand
(2006).
NORMA: a tool for flexible fitting of high-resolution protein structures into low-resolution electron-microscopy-derived density maps.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
62,
1098-1100.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Cliff,
C.Limpkin,
A.Cameron,
S.G.Burston,
and
A.R.Clarke
(2006).
Elucidation of steps in the capture of a protein substrate for efficient encapsulation by GroE.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
21266-21275.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Yokokawa,
C.Wada,
T.Ando,
N.Sakai,
A.Yagi,
S.H.Yoshimura,
and
K.Takeyasu
(2006).
Fast-scanning atomic force microscopy reveals the ATP/ADP-dependent conformational changes of GroEL.
|
| |
EMBO J,
25,
4567-4576.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.A.Ranson,
D.K.Clare,
G.W.Farr,
D.Houldershaw,
A.L.Horwich,
and
H.R.Saibil
(2006).
Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL-GroES complexes.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
147-152.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Danziger,
L.Shimon,
and
A.Horovitz
(2006).
Glu257 in GroEL is a sensor involved in coupling polypeptide substrate binding to stimulation of ATP hydrolysis.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
15,
1270-1276.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Berezov,
M.J.McNeill,
A.Iriarte,
and
M.Martinez-Carrion
(2005).
Electron paramagnetic resonance and fluorescence studies of the conformation of aspartate aminotransferase bound to GroEL.
|
| |
Protein J,
24,
465-478.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Sot,
F.von Germar,
W.Mäntele,
J.M.Valpuesta,
S.G.Taneva,
and
A.Muga
(2005).
Ionic interactions at both inter-ring contact sites of GroEL are involved in transmission of the allosteric signal: a time-resolved infrared difference study.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
14,
2267-2274.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.V.Robinson
(2005).
Watching and weighting--chaperone complexes in action.
|
| |
Nat Methods,
2,
331-332.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Rivenzon-Segal,
S.G.Wolf,
L.Shimon,
K.R.Willison,
and
A.Horovitz
(2005).
Sequential ATP-induced allosteric transitions of the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP-1 revealed by EM analysis.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
12,
233-237.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Bahar,
and
A.J.Rader
(2005).
Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
15,
586-592.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Topf,
and
A.Sali
(2005).
Combining electron microscopy and comparative protein structure modeling.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
15,
578-585.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Y.Kim,
A.N.Semyonov,
R.J.Twieg,
A.L.Horwich,
J.Frydman,
and
W.E.Moerner
(2005).
Probing the sequence of conformationally induced polarity changes in the molecular chaperonin GroEL with fluorescence spectroscopy.
|
| |
J Phys Chem B,
109,
24517-24525.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Jiang,
and
S.J.Ludtke
(2005).
Electron cryomicroscopy of single particles at subnanometer resolution.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
15,
571-577.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.van der Vaart,
J.Ma,
and
M.Karplus
(2004).
The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate.
|
| |
Biophys J,
87,
562-573.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.T.Sewell,
R.B.Best,
S.Chen,
A.M.Roseman,
G.W.Farr,
A.L.Horwich,
and
H.R.Saibil
(2004).
A mutant chaperonin with rearranged inter-ring electrostatic contacts and temperature-sensitive dissociation.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
11,
1128-1133.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Pantazatos,
J.S.Kim,
H.E.Klock,
R.C.Stevens,
I.A.Wilson,
S.A.Lesley,
and
V.L.Woods
(2004).
Rapid refinement of crystallographic protein construct definition employing enhanced hydrogen/deuterium exchange MS.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
101,
751-756.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Motojima,
C.Chaudhry,
W.A.Fenton,
G.W.Farr,
and
A.L.Horwich
(2004).
Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
101,
15005-15012.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Gunasekaran,
B.Ma,
and
R.Nussinov
(2004).
Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins?
|
| |
Proteins,
57,
433-443.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.A.Pereira,
M.P.Klejman,
C.Ruhlmann,
F.Kavelaars,
M.Oulad-Abdelghani,
H.T.Timmers,
and
P.Schultz
(2004).
Molecular architecture of the basal transcription factor B-TFIID.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
21802-21807.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Taniguchi,
T.Yoshimi,
K.Hongo,
T.Mizobata,
and
Y.Kawata
(2004).
Stopped-flow fluorescence analysis of the conformational changes in the GroEL apical domain: relationships between movements in the apical domain and the quaternary structure of GroEL.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
16368-16376.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Shimamura,
A.Koike-Takeshita,
K.Yokoyama,
R.Masui,
N.Murai,
M.Yoshida,
H.Taguchi,
and
S.Iwata
(2004).
Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity.
|
| |
Structure,
12,
1471-1480.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Sot,
S.Bañuelos,
J.M.Valpuesta,
and
A.Muga
(2003).
GroEL stability and function. Contribution of the ionic interactions at the inter-ring contact sites.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
278,
32083-32090.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Chaudhry,
G.W.Farr,
M.J.Todd,
H.S.Rye,
A.T.Brunger,
P.D.Adams,
A.L.Horwich,
and
P.B.Sigler
(2003).
Role of the gamma-phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL-GroES: function, structure and energetics.
|
| |
EMBO J,
22,
4877-4887.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Ishii,
K.Kinbara,
Y.Ishida,
N.Ishii,
M.Okochi,
M.Yohda,
and
T.Aida
(2003).
Chaperonin-mediated stabilization and ATP-triggered release of semiconductor nanoparticles.
|
| |
Nature,
423,
628-632.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.W.Farr,
W.A.Fenton,
T.K.Chaudhuri,
D.K.Clare,
H.R.Saibil,
and
A.L.Horwich
(2003).
Folding with and without encapsulation by cis- and trans-only GroEL-GroES complexes.
|
| |
EMBO J,
22,
3220-3230.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.D.Schrag,
D.O.Procopio,
M.Cygler,
D.Y.Thomas,
and
J.J.Bergeron
(2003).
Lectin control of protein folding and sorting in the secretory pathway.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
28,
49-57.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Karplus,
and
M.Karplus
(2003).
Molecular dynamics of biological macromolecules: a brief history and perspective.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
68,
350-358.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Danziger,
D.Rivenzon-Segal,
S.G.Wolf,
and
A.Horovitz
(2003).
Conversion of the allosteric transition of GroEL from concerted to sequential by the single mutation Asp-155 -> Ala.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
100,
13797-13802.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.N.Savvides,
H.J.Yeo,
M.R.Beck,
F.Blaesing,
R.Lurz,
E.Lanka,
R.Buhrdorf,
W.Fischer,
R.Haas,
and
G.Waksman
(2003).
VirB11 ATPases are dynamic hexameric assemblies: new insights into bacterial type IV secretion.
|
| |
EMBO J,
22,
1969-1980.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Shimamura,
A.Koike-Takeshita,
K.Yokoyama,
M.Yoshida,
H.Taguchi,
and
S.Iwata
(2003).
Crystallization of the chaperonin GroEL-GroES complex from Thermus thermophilus HB8.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
59,
1632-1634.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Horovitz,
A.Amir,
O.Danziger,
and
G.Kafri
(2002).
Phi value analysis of heterogeneity in pathways of allosteric transitions: Evidence for parallel pathways of ATP-induced conformational changes in a GroEL ring.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
99,
14095-14097.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Sot,
A.Galán,
J.M.Valpuesta,
S.Bertrand,
and
A.Muga
(2002).
Salt bridges at the inter-ring interface regulate the thermostat of GroEL.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
277,
34024-34029.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.R.Saibil,
and
N.A.Ranson
(2002).
The chaperonin folding machine.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
27,
627-632.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.D.Wang,
C.Herman,
K.A.Tipton,
C.A.Gross,
and
J.S.Weissman
(2002).
Directed evolution of substrate-optimized GroEL/S chaperonins.
|
| |
Cell,
111,
1027-1039.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Ma,
T.C.Flynn,
Q.Cui,
A.G.Leslie,
J.E.Walker,
and
M.Karplus
(2002).
A dynamic analysis of the rotation mechanism for conformational change in F(1)-ATPase.
|
| |
Structure,
10,
921-931.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.M.Gierasch
(2002).
Caught in the act: how ATP binding triggers cooperative conformational changes in a molecular machine.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
9,
3-5.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Karplus,
and
J.A.McCammon
(2002).
Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol,
9,
646-652.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Chiu,
M.L.Baker,
W.Jiang,
and
Z.H.Zhou
(2002).
Deriving folds of macromolecular complexes through electron cryomicroscopy and bioinformatics approaches.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
12,
263-269.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |