|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 8 more)
525 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 1 more)
93 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Chaperone
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Fitted coordinates for groel-adp7-groes cryo-em complex (emd-1181)
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
60 kda chaperonin. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n. Synonym: groel, protein cpn60, groel protein. Engineered: yes. 10 kda chaperonin molecule: groes, protein cpn10, groes protein. Chain: o, p, q, r, s, t, u. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Expression_system_taxid: 562
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
21mer (from
)
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
N.A.Ranson,D.K.Clare,G.W.Farr,D.Houldershaw,A.L.Horwich,H.R.Saibil
|
Key ref:
|
 |
N.A.Ranson
et al.
(2006).
Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL-GroES complexes.
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
147-152.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
22-Nov-05
|
Release date:
|
25-Jan-06
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 2:
|
 |
Chains A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N:
E.C.5.6.1.7
- chaperonin ATPase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide = ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ATP
|
+
|
H2O
|
+
|
folded polypeptide
|
=
|
ADP
|
+
|
phosphate
|
+
|
unfolded polypeptide
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 3:
|
 |
Chains O, P, Q, R, S, T, U:
E.C.?
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Note, where more than one E.C. class is given (as above), each may
correspond to a different protein domain or, in the case of polyprotein
precursors, to a different mature protein.
|
|
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nat Struct Mol Biol
13:147-152
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL-GroES complexes.
|
|
N.A.Ranson,
D.K.Clare,
G.W.Farr,
D.Houldershaw,
A.L.Horwich,
H.R.Saibil.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The double-ring chaperonin GroEL and its lid-like cochaperonin GroES form
asymmetric complexes that, in the ATP-bound state, mediate productive folding in
a hydrophilic, GroES-encapsulated chamber, the so-called cis cavity. Upon ATP
hydrolysis within the cis ring, the asymmetric complex becomes able to accept
non-native polypeptides and ATP in the open, trans ring. Here we have examined
the structural basis for this allosteric switch in activity by cryo-EM and
single-particle image processing. ATP hydrolysis does not change the
conformation of the cis ring, but its effects are transmitted through an
inter-ring contact and cause domain rotations in the mobile trans ring. These
rigid-body movements in the trans ring lead to disruption of its intra-ring
contacts, expansion of the entire ring and opening of both the nucleotide pocket
and the substrate-binding domains, admitting ATP and new substrate protein.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Solution structures of GroEL–ATP[7]–GroES and
GroEL–ADP[7]–GroES. (a) Surface representation of the
side view of the GroEL–ATP[7]–GroES complex. (b) Surface
representation of the side view of the GroEL–ADP[7]–GroES
complex. (c,d) Central sections through the cryo-EM maps are
shown as a semitransparent surface in either gold (c; ATP) or
blue (d; ADP), with the atomic coordinates for the GroEL
equatorial (green; residues 3–136 and 410–524), intermediate
(yellow; residues 137–191 and 374–409), apical (red;
residues 192–373, except for 353–361 at the tip of the
mobile helical hairpin in the trans ring) and GroES (magenta)
fitted in. The seven-fold axis of the GroEL–GroES oligomer is
vertical and in the image plane for all figures. The resolutions
of the ATP- and ADP-bound maps are 7.7 Å and 8.7 Å,
respectively, determined by Fourier shell correlation at a
cutoff of 0.5. Fourier shell correlation curves for both
reconstructions are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Disruption of intra-ring contacts between the
equatorial domains of the trans ring. (a) The interface
between neighboring equatorial domains in the trans ring of the
ATP-bound complex. The EM-derived electron density is shown as a
gold mesh, with the adjacent equatorial domains in blue and
magenta. In the ATP complex (and all crystal structures of GroEL
complexes), two -strands
from each subunit form a four-stranded -sheet
that is a major contact holding the ring of equatorial domains
together (highlighted by a black rectangle). (b) The
corresponding view of the ADP-bound complex (with EM density
shown as a blue mesh and equatorial domains in green and orange)
shows that a small ( 3°)
rotation of the equatorial domain results in the two strands
from the orange subunit moving upward (in this view) and the two
strands from the green subunit moving downward, pulling apart
the -sheet
contact. (c,d) Structure of the rear half of the ring of
equatorial domains from the ATP-bound (c) and ADP-bound (d)
complexes. The seven-fold axis is vertical and in the image
plane, and these views are reached by tipping a and b forward by
30°.
(e) A comparison of the intra-strand (main chain) distances in
the ATP (blue and magenta) and ADP (green and gold) complexes,
showing that the strand separation increases by 4–5 Å
upon ATP hydrolysis.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Mol Biol
(2006,
13,
147-152)
copyright 2006.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
K.Park,
and
D.Kim
(2011).
Modeling allosteric signal propagation using protein structure networks.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
12,
S23.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Skjaerven,
B.Grant,
A.Muga,
K.Teigen,
J.A.McCammon,
N.Reuter,
and
A.Martinez
(2011).
Conformational sampling and nucleotide-dependent transitions of the GroEL subunit probed by unbiased molecular dynamics simulations.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
7,
e1002004.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Mukherjee,
E.Conway de Macario,
A.J.Macario,
and
L.Brocchieri
(2010).
Chaperonin genes on the rise: new divergent classes and intense duplication in human and other vertebrate genomes.
|
| |
BMC Evol Biol,
10,
64.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Li,
Z.Zheng,
A.Ramsey,
and
L.Chen
(2010).
Analysis of peptides and proteins in their binding to GroEL.
|
| |
J Pept Sci,
16,
693-700.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.K.Clare,
P.J.Bakkes,
H.van Heerikhuizen,
S.M.van der Vies,
and
H.R.Saibil
(2009).
Chaperonin complex with a newly folded protein encapsulated in the folding chamber.
|
| |
Nature,
457,
107-110.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Nagayama,
and
R.Danev
(2009).
Phase-plate electron microscopy: a novel imaging tool to reveal close-to-life nano-structures.
|
| |
Biophys Rev,
1,
37-42.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Medalia,
A.Beer,
P.Zwickl,
O.Mihalache,
M.Beck,
O.Medalia,
and
A.Navon
(2009).
Architecture and molecular mechanism of PAN, the archaeal proteasome regulatory ATPase.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
22952-22960.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Kojima,
K.Imada,
M.Sakuma,
Y.Sudo,
C.Kojima,
T.Minamino,
M.Homma,
and
K.Namba
(2009).
Stator assembly and activation mechanism of the flagellar motor by the periplasmic region of MotB.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
73,
710-718.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Koeck,
J.A.Corbett,
J.W.Crabb,
D.J.Stuehr,
and
K.S.Aulak
(2009).
Glucose-modulated tyrosine nitration in beta cells: targets and consequences.
|
| |
Arch Biochem Biophys,
484,
221-231.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Cheng,
and
T.Walz
(2009).
The advent of near-atomic resolution in single-particle electron microscopy.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem,
78,
723-742.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Yang,
P.Májek,
and
I.Bahar
(2009).
Allosteric transitions of supramolecular systems explored by network models: application to chaperonin GroEL.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
5,
e1000360.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Chennubhotla,
Z.Yang,
and
I.Bahar
(2008).
Coupling between global dynamics and signal transduction pathways: a mechanism of allostery for chaperonin GroEL.
|
| |
Mol Biosyst,
4,
287-292.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.H.Chen,
K.Luke,
J.Zhang,
W.Chiu,
and
P.Wittung-Stafshede
(2008).
Location and flexibility of the unique C-terminal tail of Aquifex aeolicus co-chaperonin protein 10 as derived by cryo-electron microscopy and biophysical techniques.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
381,
707-717.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.K.Clare,
S.Stagg,
J.Quispe,
G.W.Farr,
A.L.Horwich,
and
H.R.Saibil
(2008).
Multiple states of a nucleotide-bound group 2 chaperonin.
|
| |
Structure,
16,
528-534.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Madan,
Z.Lin,
and
H.S.Rye
(2008).
Triggering Protein Folding within the GroEL-GroES Complex.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
32003-32013.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.R.Saibil
(2008).
Chaperone machines in action.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
18,
35-42.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Stahlberg,
and
T.Walz
(2008).
Molecular electron microscopy: state of the art and current challenges.
|
| |
ACS Chem Biol,
3,
268-281.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.H.Lee,
M.A.Heo,
J.H.Seo,
J.H.Kim,
B.G.Kim,
and
S.G.Lee
(2008).
Improving the growth rate of Escherichia coli DH5alpha at low temperature through engineering of GroEL/S chaperone system.
|
| |
Biotechnol Bioeng,
99,
515-520.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Grason,
J.S.Gresham,
and
G.H.Lorimer
(2008).
Setting the chaperonin timer: a two-stroke, two-speed, protein machine.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
17339-17344.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Machida,
A.Kono-Okada,
K.Hongo,
T.Mizobata,
and
Y.Kawata
(2008).
Hydrophilic residues 526 KNDAAD 531 in the flexible C-terminal region of the chaperonin GroEL are critical for substrate protein folding within the central cavity.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
6886-6896.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Nagayama,
and
R.Danev
(2008).
Phase contrast electron microscopy: development of thin-film phase plates and biological applications.
|
| |
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci,
363,
2153-2162.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Nagayama
(2008).
Development of phase plates for electron microscopes and their biological application.
|
| |
Eur Biophys J,
37,
345-358.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.D.Thomsen,
and
J.M.Berger
(2008).
Structural frameworks for considering microbial protein- and nucleic acid-dependent motor ATPases.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
69,
1071-1090.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.C.da Fonseca,
and
E.P.Morris
(2008).
Structure of the Human 26S Proteasome: SUBUNIT RADIAL DISPLACEMENTS OPEN THE GATE INTO THE PROTEOLYTIC CORE.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
23305-23314.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.M.Stagg,
G.C.Lander,
J.Quispe,
N.R.Voss,
A.Cheng,
H.Bradlow,
S.Bradlow,
B.Carragher,
and
C.S.Potter
(2008).
A test-bed for optimizing high-resolution single particle reconstructions.
|
| |
J Struct Biol,
163,
29-39.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Inobe,
K.Takahashi,
K.Maki,
S.Enoki,
K.Kamagata,
A.Kadooka,
M.Arai,
and
K.Kuwajima
(2008).
Asymmetry of the GroEL-GroES complex under physiological conditions as revealed by small-angle x-ray scattering.
|
| |
Biophys J,
94,
1392-1402.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Sameshima,
T.Ueno,
R.Iizuka,
N.Ishii,
N.Terada,
K.Okabe,
and
T.Funatsu
(2008).
Football- and Bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES Complexes Coexist during the Reaction Cycle.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
23765-23773.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Frankenstein,
J.Sperling,
R.Sperling,
and
M.Eisenstein
(2008).
FitEM2EM--tools for low resolution study of macromolecular assembly and dynamics.
|
| |
PLoS ONE,
3,
e3594.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Horwich,
W.A.Fenton,
E.Chapman,
and
G.W.Farr
(2007).
Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
23,
115-145.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Luque,
I.Saugar,
J.F.Rodríguez,
N.Verdaguer,
D.Garriga,
C.S.Martín,
J.A.Velázquez-Muriel,
B.L.Trus,
J.L.Carrascosa,
and
J.R.Castón
(2007).
Infectious bursal disease virus capsid assembly and maturation by structural rearrangements of a transient molecular switch.
|
| |
J Virol,
81,
6869-6878.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Stan,
G.H.Lorimer,
D.Thirumalai,
and
B.R.Brooks
(2007).
Coupling between allosteric transitions in GroEL and assisted folding of a substrate protein.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
8803-8808.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Bahar,
C.Chennubhotla,
and
D.Tobi
(2007).
Intrinsic dynamics of enzymes in the unbound state and relation to allosteric regulation.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
17,
633-640.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Wendler,
J.Shorter,
C.Plisson,
A.G.Cashikar,
S.Lindquist,
and
H.R.Saibil
(2007).
Atypical AAA+ subunit packing creates an expanded cavity for disaggregation by the protein-remodeling factor Hsp104.
|
| |
Cell,
131,
1366-1377.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Reissmann,
C.Parnot,
C.R.Booth,
W.Chiu,
and
J.Frydman
(2007).
Essential function of the built-in lid in the allosteric regulation of eukaryotic and archaeal chaperonins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
14,
432-440.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Sliozberg,
and
C.F.Abrams
(2007).
Spontaneous conformational changes in the E. coli GroEL subunit from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
|
| |
Biophys J,
93,
1906-1916.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Yokokawa,
C.Wada,
T.Ando,
N.Sakai,
A.Yagi,
S.H.Yoshimura,
and
K.Takeyasu
(2006).
Fast-scanning atomic force microscopy reveals the ATP/ADP-dependent conformational changes of GroEL.
|
| |
EMBO J,
25,
4567-4576.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |