|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 1 more)
237 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 1 more)
202 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Hydrolase
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
20s proteasome in complex with calpain-inhibitor i from archaeoglobus fulgidus
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Proteasome alpha subunit. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g. Engineered: yes. Proteasome beta subunit. Chain: h, i, j, k, l, m, n. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Organism_taxid: 2234. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Heptamer (from PDB file)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.83Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.241
|
R-free:
|
0.279
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
M.Groll,H.Brandstetter,H.Bartunik,G.Bourenkow,R.Huber
|
Key ref:
|
 |
M.Groll
et al.
(2003).
Investigations on the maturation and regulation of archaebacterial proteasomes.
J Mol Biol,
327,
75-83.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
08-Jan-03
|
Release date:
|
18-Mar-03
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
Chains A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N:
E.C.3.4.25.1
- proteasome endopeptidase complex.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Cleavage at peptide bonds with very broad specificity.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
327:75-83
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Investigations on the maturation and regulation of archaebacterial proteasomes.
|
|
M.Groll,
H.Brandstetter,
H.Bartunik,
G.Bourenkow,
R.Huber.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The 20S proteasome (core particle, CP) is a multifunctional protease complex and
composed of four heptameric subunit rings arranged in a hollow, barrel-shaped
structure. Here, we report the crystal structure of the CP from Archaeoglobus
fulgidus at 2.25A resolution. The analysis of the structure of early and late
assembly intermediates of this CP gives new insights in the maturation of
archaebacterial CPs and indicates similarities to assembly intermediates
observed in eukaryotes. We also show a striking difference in mechanism and
regulation of substrate access between eukaryotic and archaebacterial 20S
proteasomes. While eukaryotic CPs are auto-inhibited by the N-terminal tails of
the outer alpha-ring by imposing topological closure with a characteristic
sequence motif (YDR-motif) and show regulatory gating this segment is disordered
in the CP and differently structured in the alpha(7)-sub-complex of A.fulgidus
leaving a pore leading into the particle with a diameter of 13A. Mutagenesis and
functional studies indicate the absence of regulatory gating in the archaeal 20S
proteasome.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Stereo view of the overlay of the C^a tracings of
the a-subunit from the a-ring (yellow) and the a-subunit from
the CP (blue).
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. (a) and (b) Ribbon drawing of the a-ring from A.
fulgidus in top and side view, respectively. The N-terminal
segments are shown in red and the remaining part is shown in
blue. (c) Stereo drawing of the open channel with a 7-fold
averaged 2F[O] -F[C] map showing the YDR element. Contacts among
residues of the YDR element in adjacent subunits are shown in
black. The carboxylate group of Asp9 forms a hydrogen bond with
the hydroxyl group of Tyr8 in the neighbouring a-subunit and
adopts a major part for the open axial channel. (d) Stereo
drawing of the closed channel of the a-ring from S. cerevisiae.
Contacts among residues of the YDR element in the a3 and a4
subunit, which maintain the regulatory gate in eukaryotes, are
shown in black sticks, whereas the N-terminal segments are
coloured in red.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2003,
327,
75-83)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.Maupin-Furlow
(2012).
Proteasomes and protein conjugation across domains of life.
|
| |
Nat Rev Microbiol,
10,
100-111.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.R.Kusmierczyk,
M.J.Kunjappu,
R.Y.Kim,
and
M.Hochstrasser
(2011).
A conserved 20S proteasome assembly factor requires a C-terminal HbYX motif for proteasomal precursor binding.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
622-629.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Gallastegui,
and
M.Groll
(2010).
The 26S proteasome: assembly and function of a destructive machine.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
35,
634-642.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Humbard,
G.Zhou,
and
J.A.Maupin-Furlow
(2009).
The N-terminal penultimate residue of 20S proteasome alpha1 influences its N(alpha) acetylation and protein levels as well as growth rate and stress responses of Haloferax volcanii.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
191,
3794-3803.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Groll,
R.Huber,
and
L.Moroder
(2009).
The persisting challenge of selective and specific proteasome inhibition.
|
| |
J Pept Sci,
15,
58-66.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Liao,
Q.Shang,
X.Zhang,
J.Zhang,
C.Xu,
and
X.Tu
(2009).
Pup, a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein, is an intrinsically disordered protein.
|
| |
Biochem J,
422,
207-215.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Cheng
(2009).
Toward an atomic model of the 26S proteasome.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
19,
203-208.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Rabl,
D.M.Smith,
Y.Yu,
S.C.Chang,
A.L.Goldberg,
and
Y.Cheng
(2008).
Mechanism of gate opening in the 20S proteasome by the proteasomal ATPases.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
30,
360-368.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Felderer,
M.Groves,
J.Diez,
E.Pohl,
and
S.Witt
(2008).
Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the Thermoplasma acidophilum 20S proteasome in complex with protein substrates.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
64,
899-902.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.C.Ramos,
and
R.J.Dohmen
(2008).
PACemakers of proteasome core particle assembly.
|
| |
Structure,
16,
1296-1304.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Borissenko,
and
M.Groll
(2007).
Diversity of proteasomal missions: fine tuning of the immune response.
|
| |
Biol Chem,
388,
947-955.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.S.Madding,
J.K.Michel,
K.R.Shockley,
S.B.Conners,
K.L.Epting,
M.R.Johnson,
and
R.M.Kelly
(2007).
Role of the beta1 subunit in the function and stability of the 20S proteasome in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
189,
583-590.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Sharon,
S.Witt,
E.Glasmacher,
W.Baumeister,
and
C.V.Robinson
(2007).
Mass spectrometry reveals the missing links in the assembly pathway of the bacterial 20 S proteasome.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
18448-18457.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Hu,
G.Lin,
M.Wang,
L.Dick,
R.M.Xu,
C.Nathan,
and
H.Li
(2006).
Structure of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome and mechanism of inhibition by a peptidyl boronate.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
59,
1417-1428.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Schulze,
A.Mulder,
A.Tinazli,
and
R.Tampé
(2006).
Controlling the activity of the 20S proteasome complex by synthetic gatekeepers.
|
| |
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl,
45,
5702-5705.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Witt,
Y.D.Kwon,
M.Sharon,
K.Felderer,
M.Beuttler,
C.V.Robinson,
W.Baumeister,
and
B.K.Jap
(2006).
Proteasome assembly triggers a switch required for active-site maturation.
|
| |
Structure,
14,
1179-1188.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.M.Smith,
G.Kafri,
Y.Cheng,
D.Ng,
T.Walz,
and
A.L.Goldberg
(2005).
ATP binding to PAN or the 26S ATPases causes association with the 20S proteasome, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded proteins.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
20,
687-698.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Cheng,
and
N.V.Grishin
(2005).
DOM-fold: a structure with crossing loops found in DmpA, ornithine acetyltransferase, and molybdenum cofactor-binding domain.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
14,
1902-1910.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Groll,
M.Bochtler,
H.Brandstetter,
T.Clausen,
and
R.Huber
(2005).
Molecular machines for protein degradation.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
6,
222-256.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Heink,
D.Ludwig,
P.M.Kloetzel,
and
E.Krüger
(2005).
IFN-gamma-induced immune adaptation of the proteasome system is an accelerated and transient response.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
9241-9246.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Kaiser,
M.Groll,
C.Siciliano,
I.Assfalg-Machleidt,
E.Weyher,
J.Kohno,
A.G.Milbradt,
C.Renner,
R.Huber,
and
L.Moroder
(2004).
Binding mode of TMC-95A analogues to eukaryotic 20S proteasome.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
5,
1256-1266.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Hutschenreiter,
A.Tinazli,
K.Model,
and
R.Tampé
(2004).
Two-substrate association with the 20S proteasome at single-molecule level.
|
| |
EMBO J,
23,
2488-2497.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Mullapudi,
L.Pullan,
O.T.Bishop,
H.Khalil,
J.K.Stoops,
R.Beckmann,
P.M.Kloetzel,
E.Krüger,
and
P.A.Penczek
(2004).
Rearrangement of the 16S precursor subunits is essential for the formation of the active 20S proteasome.
|
| |
Biophys J,
87,
4098-4105.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Förster,
F.G.Whitby,
and
C.P.Hill
(2003).
The pore of activated 20S proteasomes has an ordered 7-fold symmetric conformation.
|
| |
EMBO J,
22,
4356-4364.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Groll,
and
T.Clausen
(2003).
Molecular shredders: how proteasomes fulfill their role.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
13,
665-673.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |