 |
PDBsum entry 6j4z
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription/RNA/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
6j4z
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1414 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1157 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 6j4z
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 3980 89.6%*
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 428 9.6%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 19 0.4%
Disallowed regions [XX] 16 0.4%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 4443 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 68
Glycine residues 328
Proline residues 222
----
Total number of residues 5061
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.19
Chi1-chi2 distribution 0.18
Chi1 only 0.12
Chi3 & chi4 0.54
Omega -0.48
-0.09
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.62
Main-chain bond angles 0.30
0.44
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.12
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
 |