 |
PDBsum entry 3o2z
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 3o2z
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 1033 39.6%**
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 1066 40.8%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 346 13.3%
Disallowed regions [XX] 166 6.4%**
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 2611 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 73
Glycine residues 188
Proline residues 98
----
Total number of residues 2970
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -2.25**
Chi1-chi2 distribution 0.00
Chi1 only 0.00
Chi3 & chi4 0.00
Omega -0.73*
-1.48**
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.48
Main-chain bond angles 0.21
0.32
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE -0.52*
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
 |