|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transcription
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Structural and functional analysis of the e. Coli nusb-s10 transcription antitermination complex.
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
N utilization substance protein b. Chain: a, b, c. Synonym: protein nusb. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes. 30s ribosomal protein s10. Chain: j, k, l. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 83333. Strain: k12. Gene: nusb, ssyb, b0416, jw0406. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Gene: rpsj, nuse, b3321, jw3283.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.60Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.221
|
R-free:
|
0.280
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
X.Luo,M.C.Wahl
|
Key ref:
|
 |
X.Luo
et al.
(2008).
Structural and functional analysis of the E. coli NusB-S10 transcription antitermination complex.
Mol Cell,
32,
791-802.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
09-May-08
|
Release date:
|
13-Jan-09
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Mol Cell
32:791-802
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural and functional analysis of the E. coli NusB-S10 transcription antitermination complex.
|
|
X.Luo,
H.H.Hsiao,
M.Bubunenko,
G.Weber,
D.L.Court,
M.E.Gottesman,
H.Urlaub,
M.C.Wahl.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Protein S10 is a component of the 30S ribosomal subunit and participates
together with NusB protein in processive transcription antitermination. The
molecular mechanisms by which S10 can act as a translation or a transcription
factor are not understood. We used complementation assays and recombineering to
delineate regions of S10 dispensable for antitermination, and determined the
crystal structure of a transcriptionally active NusB-S10 complex. In this
complex, S10 adopts the same fold as in the 30S subunit and is blocked from
simultaneous association with the ribosome. Mass spectrometric mapping of
UV-induced crosslinks revealed that the NusB-S10 complex presents an
intermolecular, composite, and contiguous binding surface for RNAs containing
BoxA antitermination signals. Furthermore, S10 overproduction complemented a
nusB null phenotype. These data demonstrate that S10 and NusB together form a
BoxA-binding module, that NusB facilitates entry of S10 into the transcription
machinery, and that S10 represents a central hub in processive antitermination.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. BoxA RNA Binding (A) Mapping of crosslinked
peptides on the surface of the NusB-S10^Δloop complex. The view
is from the top of Figure 2A. NusB, dark gray; S10, light gray.
Crosslinked peptides of NusB (B1, B2, B3; see Table S3 for
peptide sequences) are dark blue, cyan, and steel blue,
respectively. Crosslinked peptides of S10 (E1 and E3) are red
and violet, respectively. Asp118, gold. RNAs encompassing the
rrn and λ BoxA elements and used for crosslinking are given
above and below the structure, respectively. Boxed regions with
residue numbers indicate the core BoxA elements. Residues in
green of rrn BoxA RNA and λ BoxA RNA have previously been
implicated in recruitment of NusB and S10 to antitermination
complexes by mutational analysis (Mogridge et al., 1998).
Outlined residues differ in λ BoxA compared to rrn BoxA. Black
bars designate crosslinked regions of the RNAs. They are
connected by lines to the peptides, to which they have been
crosslinked (Table S3). Inset 1 illustrates the deduced topology
of the NusB-S10-BoxA RNA complexes. (B) (Top)
Representative crosslinking of λ NutR BoxA RNA (left two
panels) or rrn BoxA RNA (right two panels) to NusB-S10^Δloop or
NusB101-S10^Δloop (NusB^Asp118Asn-S10^Δloop). Two
concentrations of protein complex (0.31 and 0.62 μM) were
crosslinked, resolved on SDS gels, and visualized by
autoradiography. In each panel, RNA alone is in the left lane,
NusB-S10^Δloop complex in the central lane, and
NusB101-S10^Δloop complex in the right lane. (Bottom)
Quantification of crosslink yields. Values are the crosslink
yields of the protein components of the NusB101-S10^Δloop
samples, relative to the crosslink yields of the corresponding
components of the NusB-S10^Δloop samples. The crosslink yields
of the components of the NusB-S10^Δloop samples were set at
100% (dashed lines). Values represent the mean of three
independent experiments ± the standard errors of the
mean. ^*p ≤ 0.032; ^**p ≤ 0.020.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. NusB-S10^Δloop,Ala86Asp Complex (A)
Comparison of the NusB-S10^Δloop complex (left) with the
NusB-S10^Δloop,Ala86Asp complex (right). Gray meshes, final
2F[o] − F[c] electron densities covering residue 86 and
neighboring residues of the S10^Δloop molecules, contoured at
the 1σ level. (Insets) Closeup views of the residue 86 regions.
The orientation relative to Figure 2A is indicated. (B)
Comparison of the electrostatic surface potentials of the
complexes. Blue, positive charge; red, negative charge. Left,
NusB-S10^Δloop complex. Right, NusB-S10^Δloop,Ala86Asp
complex. The positions of residue 86 are circled. The
orientations are the same as in (A).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Cell Press:
Mol Cell
(2008,
32,
791-802)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Yano,
S.Horiya,
T.Minami,
E.Haneda,
M.Ikeda,
and
K.Harada
(2010).
Identification of antisense RNA stem-loops that inhibit RNA-protein interactions using a bacterial reporter system.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
3489-3501.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.M.Burmann,
K.Schweimer,
X.Luo,
M.C.Wahl,
B.L.Stitt,
M.E.Gottesman,
and
P.Rösch
(2010).
A NusE:NusG complex links transcription and translation.
|
| |
Science,
328,
501-504.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.M.Burmann,
X.Luo,
P.Rösch,
M.C.Wahl,
and
M.E.Gottesman
(2010).
Fine tuning of the E. coli NusB:NusE complex affinity to BoxA RNA is required for processive antitermination.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
314-326.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Fabris,
and
E.T.Yu
(2010).
Elucidating the higher-order structure of biopolymers by structural probing and mass spectrometry: MS3D.
|
| |
J Mass Spectrom,
45,
841-860.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Kühn-Hölsken,
C.Lenz,
A.Dickmanns,
H.H.Hsiao,
F.M.Richter,
B.Kastner,
R.Ficner,
and
H.Urlaub
(2010).
Mapping the binding site of snurportin 1 on native U1 snRNP by cross-linking and mass spectrometry.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
5581-5593.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.K.Singarapu,
J.L.Mills,
R.Xiao,
T.Acton,
M.Punta,
M.Fischer,
B.Honig,
B.Rost,
G.T.Montelione,
and
T.Szyperski
(2010).
Solution NMR structures of proteins VPA0419 from Vibrio parahaemolyticus and yiiS from Shigella flexneri provide structural coverage for protein domain family PFAM 04175.
|
| |
Proteins,
78,
779-784.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.Warner,
and
K.B.McIntosh
(2009).
How common are extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins?
|
| |
Mol Cell,
34,
3.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Prasch,
M.Jurk,
R.S.Washburn,
M.E.Gottesman,
B.M.Wöhrl,
and
P.Rösch
(2009).
RNA-binding specificity of E. coli NusA.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
37,
4736-4742.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.A.Weisberg
(2008).
Transcription by moonlight: structural basis of an extraribosomal activity of ribosomal protein S10.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
32,
747-748.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |