 |
PDBsum entry 3cod
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proton transport
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3cod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nature
453:1266-1270
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Modest stabilization by most hydrogen-bonded side-chain interactions in membrane proteins.
|
|
N.H.Joh,
A.Min,
S.Faham,
J.P.Whitelegge,
D.Yang,
V.L.Woods,
J.U.Bowie.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Understanding the energetics of molecular interactions is fundamental to all of
the central quests of structural biology including structure prediction and
design, mapping evolutionary pathways, learning how mutations cause disease,
drug design, and relating structure to function. Hydrogen-bonding is widely
regarded as an important force in a membrane environment because of the low
dielectric constant of membranes and a lack of competition from water. Indeed,
polar residue substitutions are the most common disease-causing mutations in
membrane proteins. Because of limited structural information and technical
challenges, however, there have been few quantitative tests of hydrogen-bond
strength in the context of large membrane proteins. Here we show, by using a
double-mutant cycle analysis, that the average contribution of eight
interhelical side-chain hydrogen-bonding interactions throughout
bacteriorhodopsin is only 0.6 kcal mol(-1). In agreement with these experiments,
we find that 4% of polar atoms in the non-polar core regions of membrane
proteins have no hydrogen-bond partner and the lengths of buried hydrogen bonds
in soluble proteins and membrane protein transmembrane regions are statistically
identical. Our results indicate that most hydrogen-bond interactions in membrane
proteins are only modestly stabilizing. Weak hydrogen-bonding should be
reflected in considerations of membrane protein folding, dynamics, design,
evolution and function.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1: Double-mutant cycles for hydrogen-bonding interactions
in bacteriorhodopsin. For each cycle shown, the difference in
free energies of unfolding (black number by the arrow) was
measured for the pair of proteins connected by the arrow. Free
energies of unfolding are compared at an SDS concentration at
which the wild-type protein (WT) is 50% unfolded to minimize
extrapolations needed. Errors are s.d. for three separate
measurements. Next to each double-mutant cycle is a close-up
view of the relevant hydrogen bond shown as blue dotted line
between the altered side chains along with the heavy atom
donor–acceptor distance. Donor and acceptor residues are
labelled in green and blue, respectively. Donor–acceptor
distinction in the two strongest interactions was arbitrary. On
the basis of hydrogen-bonding patterns and nearest neighbours,
it seems that all the potentially charged residues are the
neutral species. The inset (bottom right) shows the location of
each interaction in the context of the protein (PDB ID 1C3W).
The planes of green dots indicate the estimated position of the
edge of the hydrocarbon region of the bilayer as defined
previously^28. Any interaction mediated by the residues that
contain at least one atom in the hydrocarbon region is mapped
with the red line, and the interaction in the lipid/water
interface region is mapped with a blue line.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3: Comparison of average hydrogen-bond distances in
different environments. The arrows point towards the shorter
hydrogen bonds. The P value is the probability that the distance
distributions are different by random chance based on Student's
t-test. The distributions are shown in Supplementary Information.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature
(2008,
453,
1266-1270)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.N.Pace,
H.Fu,
K.L.Fryar,
J.Landua,
S.R.Trevino,
B.A.Shirley,
M.M.Hendricks,
S.Iimura,
K.Gajiwala,
J.M.Scholtz,
and
G.R.Grimsley
(2011).
Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to protein stability.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
408,
514-528.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.E.Otzen
(2011).
Mapping the folding pathway of the transmembrane protein DsbB by protein engineering.
|
| |
Protein Eng Des Sel,
24,
139-149.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.U.Bowie
(2011).
Membrane protein folding: how important are hydrogen bonds?
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
21,
42-49.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.M.Sanchez,
G.Kang,
B.Wu,
and
J.E.Kim
(2011).
Tryptophan-Lipid Interactions in Membrane Protein Folding Probed by Ultraviolet Resonance Raman and Fluorescence Spectroscopy.
|
| |
Biophys J,
100,
2121-2130.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Chalmers,
B.D.Pascal,
S.Willis,
J.Zhang,
S.J.Iturria,
J.A.Dodge,
and
P.R.Griffin
(2011).
Methods for the Analysis of High Precision Differential Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange Data.
|
| |
Int J Mass Spectrom,
302,
59-68.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Chalmers,
S.A.Busby,
B.D.Pascal,
G.M.West,
and
P.R.Griffin
(2011).
Differential hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry analysis of protein-ligand interactions.
|
| |
Expert Rev Proteomics,
8,
43-59.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Lawrie,
E.S.Sulistijo,
and
K.R.MacKenzie
(2010).
Intermonomer hydrogen bonds enhance GxxxG-driven dimerization of the BNIP3 transmembrane domain: roles for sequence context in helix-helix association in membranes.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
396,
924-936.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.G.Metcalf,
D.T.Moore,
Y.Wu,
J.M.Kielec,
K.Molnar,
K.G.Valentine,
A.J.Wand,
J.S.Bennett,
and
W.F.DeGrado
(2010).
NMR analysis of the alphaIIb beta3 cytoplasmic interaction suggests a mechanism for integrin regulation.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
22481-22486.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.H.Huysmans,
S.A.Baldwin,
D.J.Brockwell,
and
S.E.Radford
(2010).
The transition state for folding of an outer membrane protein.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
4099-4104.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Hong,
T.M.Blois,
Z.Cao,
and
J.U.Bowie
(2010).
Method to measure strong protein-protein interactions in lipid bilayers using a steric trap.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
19802-19807.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Stehfest,
and
P.Hegemann
(2010).
Evolution of the channelrhodopsin photocycle model.
|
| |
Chemphyschem,
11,
1120-1126.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.Jusoh,
C.Welsch,
S.W.Siu,
R.A.Böckmann,
and
V.Helms
(2010).
Contribution of charged and polar residues for the formation of the E1-E2 heterodimer from Hepatitis C Virus.
|
| |
J Mol Model,
16,
1625-1637.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.D.Goldberg,
G.D.Clinthorne,
M.Goulian,
and
W.F.DeGrado
(2010).
Transmembrane polar interactions are required for signaling in the Escherichia coli sensor kinase PhoQ.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
8141-8146.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Fiedler,
J.Broecker,
and
S.Keller
(2010).
Protein folding in membranes.
|
| |
Cell Mol Life Sci,
67,
1779-1798.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Mokrab,
T.J.Stevens,
and
K.Mizuguchi
(2010).
A structural dissection of amino acid substitutions in helical transmembrane proteins.
|
| |
Proteins,
78,
2895-2907.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Pan,
and
L.Konermann
(2010).
Membrane protein structural insights from chemical labeling and mass spectrometry.
|
| |
Analyst,
135,
1191-1200.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Berndt,
O.Yizhar,
L.A.Gunaydin,
P.Hegemann,
and
K.Deisseroth
(2009).
Bi-stable neural state switches.
|
| |
Nat Neurosci,
12,
229-234.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Rath,
M.Glibowicka,
V.G.Nadeau,
G.Chen,
and
C.M.Deber
(2009).
Detergent binding explains anomalous SDS-PAGE migration of membrane proteins.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
1760-1765.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.N.Pace
(2009).
Energetics of protein hydrogen bonds.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
681-682.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Langosch,
and
I.T.Arkin
(2009).
Interaction and conformational dynamics of membrane-spanning protein helices.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
18,
1343-1358.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.J.Kim,
S.C.Howell,
W.D.Van Horn,
Y.H.Jeon,
and
C.R.Sanders
(2009).
Recent Advances in the Application of Solution NMR Spectroscopy to Multi-Span Integral Membrane Proteins.
|
| |
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc,
55,
335-360.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Hebda,
and
A.D.Miranker
(2009).
The interplay of catalysis and toxicity by amyloid intermediates on lipid bilayers: insights from type II diabetes.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biophys,
38,
125-152.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Gao,
D.A.Bosco,
E.T.Powers,
and
J.W.Kelly
(2009).
Localized thermodynamic coupling between hydrogen bonding and microenvironment polarity substantially stabilizes proteins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
684-690.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.H.Joh,
A.Oberai,
D.Yang,
J.P.Whitelegge,
and
J.U.Bowie
(2009).
Similar energetic contributions of packing in the core of membrane and water-soluble proteins.
|
| |
J Am Chem Soc,
131,
10846-10847.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Curnow,
and
P.J.Booth
(2009).
The transition state for integral membrane protein folding.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
773-778.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.J.Booth,
and
P.Curnow
(2009).
Folding scene investigation: membrane proteins.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
19,
8.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Ritter,
K.Stehfest,
A.Berndt,
P.Hegemann,
and
F.J.Bartl
(2008).
Monitoring Light-induced Structural Changes of Channelrhodopsin-2 by UV-visible and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
35033-35041.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |