 |
PDBsum entry 2pk5
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrolase/hydrolase inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2pk5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Chem Biol Drug Des
69:413-422
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Compensating enthalpic and entropic changes hinder binding affinity optimization.
|
|
V.Lafont,
A.A.Armstrong,
H.Ohtaka,
Y.Kiso,
L.Mario Amzel,
E.Freire.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
A common strategy to improve the potency of drug candidates is to introduce
chemical functionalities, like hydrogen bond donors or acceptors, at positions
where they are able to establish strong interactions with the target. However,
it is often observed that the added functionalities do not necessarily improve
potency even if they form strong hydrogen bonds. Here, we explore the
thermodynamic and structural basis for those observations. KNI-10033 is a potent
experimental HIV-1 protease inhibitor with picomolar affinity against the
wild-type enzyme (K(d) = 13 pm). The potency of the inhibitor is the result of
favorable enthalpic (DeltaH = -8.2 kcal/mol) and entropic (-TDeltaS = -6.7
kcal/mol) interactions. The replacement of the thioether group in KNI-10033 by a
sulfonyl group (KNI-10075) results in a strong hydrogen bond with the amide of
Asp 30B of the HIV-1 protease. This additional hydrogen bond improves the
binding enthalpy by 3.9 kcal/mol; however, the enthalpy gain is completely
compensated by an entropy loss, resulting in no affinity change.
Crystallographic and thermodynamic analysis of the inhibitor/protease complexes
indicates that the entropy losses are due to a combination of conformational and
solvation effects. These results provide a set of practical guidelines aimed at
overcoming enthalpy/entropy compensation and improve binding potency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
F.Daidone,
R.Florio,
S.Rinaldo,
R.Contestabile,
M.L.di Salvo,
F.Cutruzzolà,
F.Bossa,
and
A.Paiardini
(2011).
In silico and in vitro validation of serine hydroxymethyltransferase as a chemotherapeutic target of the antifolate drug pemetrexed.
|
| |
Eur J Med Chem,
46,
1616-1621.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.G.Sun,
and
S.Ye
(2011).
N-heterocyclic carbene-catalyzed [4 + 1] annulation of phthalaldehyde and imines.
|
| |
Org Biomol Chem,
9,
3632-3635.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Tresadern,
J.M.Bartolome,
G.J.Macdonald,
and
X.Langlois
(2011).
Molecular properties affecting fast dissociation from the D2 receptor.
|
| |
Bioorg Med Chem,
19,
2231-2241.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Worrall,
and
J.M.Mason
(2011).
Thermodynamic analysis of Jun-Fos coiled coil peptide antagonists.
|
| |
FEBS J,
278,
663-672.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Palencia,
A.Camara-Artigas,
M.T.Pisabarro,
J.C.Martinez,
and
I.Luque
(2010).
Role of interfacial water molecules in proline-rich ligand recognition by the Src homology 3 domain of Abl.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
2823-2833.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Qin,
R.Noberini,
X.Huan,
J.Shi,
E.B.Pasquale,
and
J.Song
(2010).
Structural characterization of the EphA4-Ephrin-B2 complex reveals new features enabling Eph-ephrin binding promiscuity.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
644-654.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.E.Ladbury,
G.Klebe,
and
E.Freire
(2010).
Adding calorimetric data to decision making in lead discovery: a hot tip.
|
| |
Nat Rev Drug Discov,
9,
23-27.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Kawasaki,
E.E.Chufan,
V.Lafont,
K.Hidaka,
Y.Kiso,
L.Mario Amzel,
and
E.Freire
(2010).
How much binding affinity can be gained by filling a cavity?
|
| |
Chem Biol Drug Des,
75,
143-151.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Liu,
L.M.Gierasch,
and
I.Bahar
(2010).
Role of Hsp70 ATPase domain intrinsic dynamics and sequence evolution in enabling its functional interactions with NEFs.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
6,
0.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.A.Edwards,
J.M.Mason,
K.Clinch,
P.C.Tyler,
G.B.Evans,
and
V.L.Schramm
(2009).
Altered enthalpy-entropy compensation in picomolar transition state analogues of human purine nucleoside phosphorylase.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
48,
5226-5238.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Scott,
C.Phillips,
A.Alex,
M.Flocco,
A.Bent,
A.Randall,
R.O'Brien,
L.Damian,
and
L.H.Jones
(2009).
Thermodynamic Optimisation in Drug Discovery: A Case Study using Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors.
|
| |
ChemMedChem,
4,
1985-1989.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Freire
(2009).
A thermodynamic approach to the affinity optimization of drug candidates.
|
| |
Chem Biol Drug Des,
74,
468-472.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.G.Udugamasooriya,
and
M.R.Spaller
(2008).
Conformational constraint in protein ligand design and the inconsistency of binding entropy.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
89,
653-667.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Freire
(2008).
Do enthalpy and entropy distinguish first in class from best in class?
|
| |
Drug Discov Today,
13,
869-874.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.A.Carlson,
R.D.Smith,
N.A.Khazanov,
P.D.Kirchhoff,
J.B.Dunbar,
and
M.L.Benson
(2008).
Differences between high- and low-affinity complexes of enzymes and nonenzymes.
|
| |
J Med Chem,
51,
6432-6441.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.T.Nguyen,
Y.Hamada,
T.Kimura,
and
Y.Kiso
(2008).
Design of potent aspartic protease inhibitors to treat various diseases.
|
| |
Arch Pharm (Weinheim),
341,
523-535.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Li,
J.J.Dantzer,
J.Nowacki,
B.J.O'Callaghan,
and
S.O.Meroueh
(2008).
PDBcal: a comprehensive dataset for receptor-ligand interactions with three-dimensional structures and binding thermodynamics from isothermal titration calorimetry.
|
| |
Chem Biol Drug Des,
71,
529-532.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Dasgupta,
and
K.S.Anderson
(2008).
Probing the role of parasite-specific, distant structural regions on communication and catalysis in the bifunctional thymidylate synthase-dihydrofolate reductase from Plasmodium falciparum.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
47,
1336-1345.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |