 |
PDBsum entry 1b50
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Chemokine
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Nmr structure of human mip-1a d26a, 10 structures
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Mip-1a. Chain: a, b. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Expressed in: pichia pastoris. Expression_system_taxid: 4922
|
|
NMR struc:
|
 |
10 models
|
 |
|
Authors:
|
 |
J.P.Waltho,L.D.Higgins,C.J.Craven,P.Tan,T.Dudgeon
|
Key ref:
|
 |
L.G.Czaplewski
et al.
(1999).
Identification of amino acid residues critical for aggregation of human CC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and RANTES. Characterization of active disaggregated chemokine variants.
J Biol Chem,
274,
16077-16084.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
11-Jan-99
|
Release date:
|
22-Jul-99
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P10147
(CCL3_HUMAN) -
C-C motif chemokine 3 from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
92 a.a.
69 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 1 residue position (black
cross)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
274:16077-16084
(1999)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Identification of amino acid residues critical for aggregation of human CC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and RANTES. Characterization of active disaggregated chemokine variants.
|
|
L.G.Czaplewski,
J.McKeating,
C.J.Craven,
L.D.Higgins,
V.Appay,
A.Brown,
T.Dudgeon,
L.A.Howard,
T.Meyers,
J.Owen,
S.R.Palan,
P.Tan,
G.Wilson,
N.R.Woods,
C.M.Heyworth,
B.I.Lord,
D.Brotherton,
R.Christison,
S.Craig,
S.Cribbes,
R.M.Edwards,
S.J.Evans,
R.Gilbert,
P.Morgan,
E.Randle,
N.Schofield,
P.G.Varley,
J.Fisher,
J.P.Waltho,
M.G.Hunter.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Human CC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and
RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed) self-associate to form
high-molecular mass aggregates. To explore the biological significance of
chemokine aggregation, nonaggregating variants were sought. The phenotypes of
105 hMIP-1alpha variants generated by systematic mutagenesis and expression in
yeast were determined. hMIP-1alpha residues Asp26 and Glu66 were critical to the
self-association process. Substitution at either residue resulted in the
formation of essentially homogenous tetramers at 0.5 mg/ml. Substitution of
identical or analogous residues in homologous positions in both hMIP-1beta and
RANTES demonstrated that they were also critical to aggregation. Our analysis
suggests that a single charged residue at either position 26 or 66 is
insufficient to support extensive aggregation and that two charged residues must
be present. Solution of the three-dimensional NMR structure of hMIP-1alpha has
enabled comparison of these residues in hMIP-1beta and RANTES. Aggregated and
disaggregated forms of hMIP-1alpha, hMIP-1beta, and RANTES generally have
equivalent G-protein-coupled receptor-mediated biological potencies. We have
therefore generated novel reagents to evaluate the role of hMIP-1alpha,
hMIP-1beta, and RANTES aggregation in vitro and in vivo. The disaggregated
chemokines retained their human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) inhibitory
activities. Surprisingly, high concentrations of RANTES, but not disaggregated
RANTES variants, enhanced infection of cells by both M- and T-tropic HIV
isolates/strains. This observation has important implications for potential
therapeutic uses of chemokines implying that disaggregated forms may be
necessary for safe clinical investigation.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Identification of fully active disaggregated
mutants of hMIP-1 . A, the
number of single amino acid substitutions generated at each
residue in hMIP-1 . For a
full description of all substitutions see Craig et al. (41). The
number of alternative amino acid substitutions at each residue,
which expressed well ( 20% hMIP-1
), is shown
above the origin and those which expressed poorly ( 20% hMIP-1
) below the
origin. Cysteine residues at amino acid positions 10, 11, 34,
and 50 were not mutated to retain structural integrity. B and
subsequent panels refer to amino acid residues at which the
described properties have been identified are shown with a tall
histogram and variants which were assayed for a property but did
not meet the criteria (e.g. they were not disaggregated or they
were less potent) are shown by short histograms. B, variants
that expressed well and were disaggregated according to native
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Disaggregated variants
migrated substantially further into the gel than hMIP-1 , which
remained near the well. C, variants that were disaggregated
according to sedimentation equilibrium AUC analysis.
Disaggregated variants possessed weight average molecular
weights 100,000 Da.
D, disaggregated variants that retained full competitive
receptor binding activity on FDCP-mix A4 cells. Fully active
variants were defined as those with IC[50] values 8 nM in this
cellular assay.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Three-dimensional structure of hMIP-1 D26A and
comparative positions of amino acid residues in hMIP-1 , hMIP-1
, and RANTES
. A, stereo view of the overlay of the monomer backbone
structures of hMIP-1 D26A and
hMIP-1 . The
regions 1-15, 31-38, and 67-69, which are discussed in the text,
are shown as a thin trace, whereas the rest of the backbone is
shown as a thick trace. B, from left to right, space-filling
representations of the three-dimensional NMR structures of
hMIP-1 D26A,
RANTES (6), and hMIP-1 (5) are
shown to illustrate the relative positions of the key acidic
amino acid residues involved in chemokine self-association at
positions 26 and 66 (27 and 67 in hMIP-1 ) shaded in
dark gray. The positions of the basic residues in the 44, 45,
and 47 positions (positions 45, 46, and 47 in hMIP-1 ), which we
speculate may be involved in charge interactions leading to
self-association are shaded in light gray. The terminal residues
1-15 and 67-69 are not shown in this figure.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(1999,
274,
16077-16084)
copyright 1999.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
O.Chertov,
N.Zhang,
X.Chen,
J.J.Oppenheim,
J.Lubkowski,
C.McGrath,
R.C.Sowder,
B.J.Crise,
A.Malyguine,
M.A.Kutzler,
A.D.Steele,
E.E.Henderson,
and
T.J.Rogers
(2011).
Novel Peptides Based on HIV-1 gp120 Sequence with Homology to Chemokines Inhibit HIV Infection in Cell Culture.
|
| |
PLoS One,
6,
e14474.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Wu,
E.Y.Chien,
C.D.Mol,
G.Fenalti,
W.Liu,
V.Katritch,
R.Abagyan,
A.Brooun,
P.Wells,
F.C.Bi,
D.J.Hamel,
P.Kuhn,
T.M.Handel,
V.Cherezov,
and
R.C.Stevens
(2010).
Structures of the CXCR4 chemokine GPCR with small-molecule and cyclic peptide antagonists.
|
| |
Science,
330,
1066-1071.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Ren,
Q.Guo,
L.Guo,
M.Lenz,
F.Qian,
R.R.Koenen,
H.Xu,
A.B.Schilling,
C.Weber,
R.D.Ye,
A.R.Dinner,
and
W.J.Tang
(2010).
Polymerization of MIP-1 chemokine (CCL3 and CCL4) and clearance of MIP-1 by insulin-degrading enzyme.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
3952-3966.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Colobran,
E.Pedrosa,
L.Carretero-Iglesia,
and
M.Juan
(2010).
Copy number variation in chemokine superfamily: the complex scene of CCL3L-CCL4L genes in health and disease.
|
| |
Clin Exp Immunol,
162,
41-52.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Brandner,
A.Rek,
M.Diedrichs-Möhring,
G.Wildner,
and
A.J.Kungl
(2009).
Engineering the glycosaminoglycan-binding affinity, kinetics and oligomerization behavior of RANTES: a tool for generating chemokine-based glycosaminoglycan antagonists.
|
| |
Protein Eng Des Sel,
22,
367-373.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Secchi,
Q.Xu,
P.Lusso,
and
L.Vangelista
(2009).
The superior folding of a RANTES analogue expressed in lactobacilli as compared to mammalian cells reveals a promising system to screen new RANTES mutants.
|
| |
Protein Expr Purif,
68,
34-41.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.V.Nesmelova,
Y.Sham,
J.Gao,
and
K.H.Mayo
(2008).
CXC and CC chemokines form mixed heterodimers: association free energies from molecular dynamics simulations and experimental correlations.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
24155-24166.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Vangelista,
M.Secchi,
and
P.Lusso
(2008).
Rational design of novel HIV-1 entry inhibitors by RANTES engineering.
|
| |
Vaccine,
26,
3008-3015.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Teng,
P.Shadbolt,
A.G.Fraser,
G.Jansen,
and
J.McCafferty
(2008).
Control of feeding behavior in C. elegans by human G protein-coupled receptors permits screening for agonist-expressing bacteria.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
14826-14831.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Jia,
N.V.Serbina,
K.Brandl,
M.X.Zhong,
I.M.Leiner,
I.F.Charo,
and
E.G.Pamer
(2008).
Additive roles for MCP-1 and MCP-3 in CCR2-mediated recruitment of inflammatory monocytes during Listeria monocytogenes infection.
|
| |
J Immunol,
180,
6846-6853.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Allen,
S.E.Crown,
and
T.M.Handel
(2007).
Chemokine: receptor structure, interactions, and antagonism.
|
| |
Annu Rev Immunol,
25,
787-820.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Weber,
and
R.R.Koenen
(2006).
Fine-tuning leukocyte responses: towards a chemokine 'interactome'.
|
| |
Trends Immunol,
27,
268-273.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Rajarathnam,
G.N.Prado,
H.Fernando,
I.Clark-Lewis,
and
J.Navarro
(2006).
Probing receptor binding activity of interleukin-8 dimer using a disulfide trap.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
45,
7882-7888.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Rajagopalan,
and
K.Rajarathnam
(2006).
Structural basis of chemokine receptor function--a model for binding affinity and ligand selectivity.
|
| |
Biosci Rep,
26,
325-339.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Rosen,
M.Sharon,
S.R.Quadt-Akabayov,
and
J.Anglister
(2006).
Molecular switch for alternative conformations of the HIV-1 V3 region: implications for phenotype conversion.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
13950-13955.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Rubant,
R.J.Ludwig,
J.Pfeffer,
P.Schulze-Johann,
R.Kaufmann,
J.M.Pfeilschifter,
W.H.Boehncke,
and
H.H.Radeke
(2006).
Eukaryotic expression of the broad-spectrum chemokine receptor antagonist vMIP-II and its effects on T-cell function in vitro and in vivo.
|
| |
Exp Dermatol,
15,
634-642.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.M.Kish-Catalone,
W.Lu,
R.C.Gallo,
and
A.L.DeVico
(2006).
Preclinical evaluation of synthetic -2 RANTES as a candidate vaginal microbicide to target CCR5.
|
| |
Antimicrob Agents Chemother,
50,
1497-1509.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.M.Handel,
Z.Johnson,
S.E.Crown,
E.K.Lau,
and
A.E.Proudfoot
(2005).
Regulation of protein function by glycosaminoglycans--as exemplified by chemokines.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem,
74,
385-410.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Johnson,
A.E.Proudfoot,
and
T.M.Handel
(2005).
Interaction of chemokines and glycosaminoglycans: a new twist in the regulation of chemokine function with opportunities for therapeutic intervention.
|
| |
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev,
16,
625-636.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Mueller,
and
P.G.Strange
(2004).
Mechanisms of internalization and recycling of the chemokine receptor, CCR5.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem,
271,
243-252.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Schountz,
R.Green,
B.Davenport,
A.Buniger,
T.Richens,
J.J.Root,
F.Davidson,
C.H.Calisher,
and
B.J.Beaty
(2004).
Cloning and characterization of deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) cytokine and chemokine cDNAs.
|
| |
BMC Immunol,
5,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.E.Proudfoot,
T.M.Handel,
Z.Johnson,
E.K.Lau,
P.LiWang,
I.Clark-Lewis,
F.Borlat,
T.N.Wells,
and
M.H.Kosco-Vilbois
(2003).
Glycosaminoglycan binding and oligomerization are essential for the in vivo activity of certain chemokines.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
100,
1885-1890.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.J.Swaminathan,
D.E.Holloway,
R.A.Colvin,
G.K.Campanella,
A.C.Papageorgiou,
A.D.Luster,
and
K.R.Acharya
(2003).
Crystal structures of oligomeric forms of the IP-10/CXCL10 chemokine.
|
| |
Structure,
11,
521-532.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Fernandez,
and
E.Lolis
(2002).
Structure, function, and inhibition of chemokines.
|
| |
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol,
42,
469-499.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Menten,
A.Wuyts,
and
J.Van Damme
(2002).
Macrophage inflammatory protein-1.
|
| |
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev,
13,
455-481.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.L.Chang,
C.J.Gordon,
B.Roscic-Mrkic,
C.Power,
A.E.Proudfoot,
J.P.Moore,
and
A.Trkola
(2002).
Interaction of the CC-chemokine RANTES with glycosaminoglycans activates a p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent signaling pathway and enhances human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity.
|
| |
J Virol,
76,
2245-2254.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Mbemba,
H.Slimani,
A.Atemezem,
L.Saffar,
and
L.Gattegno
(2001).
Glycans are involved in RANTES binding to CCR5 positive as well as to CCR5 negative cells.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1510,
354-366.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Martin,
C.Blanpain,
P.Garnier,
V.Wittamer,
M.Parmentier,
and
C.Vita
(2001).
Structural and functional analysis of the RANTES-glycosaminoglycans interactions.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
40,
6303-6318.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.A.Staniforth,
S.Giannini,
L.D.Higgins,
M.J.Conroy,
A.M.Hounslow,
R.Jerala,
C.J.Craven,
and
J.P.Waltho
(2001).
Three-dimensional domain swapping in the folded and molten-globule states of cystatins, an amyloid-forming structural superfamily.
|
| |
EMBO J,
20,
4774-4781.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Appay,
and
S.L.Rowland-Jones
(2001).
RANTES: a versatile and controversial chemokine.
|
| |
Trends Immunol,
22,
83-87.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Shao,
E.Fernandez,
A.Sachpatzidis,
J.Wilken,
D.A.Thompson,
B.I.Schweitzer,
and
E.Lolis
(2001).
CCR2 and CCR5 receptor-binding properties of herpesvirus-8 vMIP-II based on sequence analysis and its solution structure.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem,
268,
2948-2959.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Waller,
P.Nayee,
and
L.G.Czaplewski
(2000).
Identification and characterization of a rat macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha receptor.
|
| |
J Hematother Stem Cell Res,
9,
703-709.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.S.Laurence,
C.Blanpain,
J.W.Burgner,
M.Parmentier,
and
P.J.LiWang
(2000).
CC chemokine MIP-1 beta can function as a monomer and depends on Phe13 for receptor binding.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
39,
3401-3409.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.T.Ashfield,
T.Meyers,
D.Lowne,
P.G.Varley,
J.R.Arnold,
P.Tan,
J.C.Yang,
L.G.Czaplewski,
T.Dudgeon,
and
J.Fisher
(2000).
Chemical modification of a variant of human MIP-1alpha; implications for dimer structure.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
9,
2047-2053.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |