 |
PDBsum entry 1b50
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Identification of amino acid residues critical for aggregation of human cc chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (mip)-1alpha, Mip-1beta, And rantes. Characterization of active disaggregated chemokine variants.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
L.G.Czaplewski,
J.Mckeating,
C.J.Craven,
L.D.Higgins,
V.Appay,
A.Brown,
T.Dudgeon,
L.A.Howard,
T.Meyers,
J.Owen,
S.R.Palan,
P.Tan,
G.Wilson,
N.R.Woods,
C.M.Heyworth,
B.I.Lord,
D.Brotherton,
R.Christison,
S.Craig,
S.Cribbes,
R.M.Edwards,
S.J.Evans,
R.Gilbert,
P.Morgan,
E.Randle,
N.Schofield,
P.G.Varley,
J.Fisher,
J.P.Waltho,
M.G.Hunter.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Biol Chem, 1999,
274,
16077-16084.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Human CC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and
RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed) self-associate to form
high-molecular mass aggregates. To explore the biological significance of
chemokine aggregation, nonaggregating variants were sought. The phenotypes of
105 hMIP-1alpha variants generated by systematic mutagenesis and expression in
yeast were determined. hMIP-1alpha residues Asp26 and Glu66 were critical to the
self-association process. Substitution at either residue resulted in the
formation of essentially homogenous tetramers at 0.5 mg/ml. Substitution of
identical or analogous residues in homologous positions in both hMIP-1beta and
RANTES demonstrated that they were also critical to aggregation. Our analysis
suggests that a single charged residue at either position 26 or 66 is
insufficient to support extensive aggregation and that two charged residues must
be present. Solution of the three-dimensional NMR structure of hMIP-1alpha has
enabled comparison of these residues in hMIP-1beta and RANTES. Aggregated and
disaggregated forms of hMIP-1alpha, hMIP-1beta, and RANTES generally have
equivalent G-protein-coupled receptor-mediated biological potencies. We have
therefore generated novel reagents to evaluate the role of hMIP-1alpha,
hMIP-1beta, and RANTES aggregation in vitro and in vivo. The disaggregated
chemokines retained their human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) inhibitory
activities. Surprisingly, high concentrations of RANTES, but not disaggregated
RANTES variants, enhanced infection of cells by both M- and T-tropic HIV
isolates/strains. This observation has important implications for potential
therapeutic uses of chemokines implying that disaggregated forms may be
necessary for safe clinical investigation.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Identification of fully active disaggregated
mutants of hMIP-1 . A, the
number of single amino acid substitutions generated at each
residue in hMIP-1 . For a
full description of all substitutions see Craig et al. (41). The
number of alternative amino acid substitutions at each residue,
which expressed well ( 20% hMIP-1
), is shown
above the origin and those which expressed poorly ( 20% hMIP-1
) below the
origin. Cysteine residues at amino acid positions 10, 11, 34,
and 50 were not mutated to retain structural integrity. B and
subsequent panels refer to amino acid residues at which the
described properties have been identified are shown with a tall
histogram and variants which were assayed for a property but did
not meet the criteria (e.g. they were not disaggregated or they
were less potent) are shown by short histograms. B, variants
that expressed well and were disaggregated according to native
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Disaggregated variants
migrated substantially further into the gel than hMIP-1 , which
remained near the well. C, variants that were disaggregated
according to sedimentation equilibrium AUC analysis.
Disaggregated variants possessed weight average molecular
weights 100,000 Da.
D, disaggregated variants that retained full competitive
receptor binding activity on FDCP-mix A4 cells. Fully active
variants were defined as those with IC[50] values 8 nM in this
cellular assay.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Three-dimensional structure of hMIP-1 D26A and
comparative positions of amino acid residues in hMIP-1 , hMIP-1
, and RANTES
. A, stereo view of the overlay of the monomer backbone
structures of hMIP-1 D26A and
hMIP-1 . The
regions 1-15, 31-38, and 67-69, which are discussed in the text,
are shown as a thin trace, whereas the rest of the backbone is
shown as a thick trace. B, from left to right, space-filling
representations of the three-dimensional NMR structures of
hMIP-1 D26A,
RANTES (6), and hMIP-1 (5) are
shown to illustrate the relative positions of the key acidic
amino acid residues involved in chemokine self-association at
positions 26 and 66 (27 and 67 in hMIP-1 ) shaded in
dark gray. The positions of the basic residues in the 44, 45,
and 47 positions (positions 45, 46, and 47 in hMIP-1 ), which we
speculate may be involved in charge interactions leading to
self-association are shaded in light gray. The terminal residues
1-15 and 67-69 are not shown in this figure.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(1999,
274,
16077-16084)
copyright 1999.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |