 |
PDBsum entry 1jol
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxidoreductase
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1jol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.1.5.1.3
- dihydrofolate reductase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

Pathway:
|
 |
Folate Coenzymes
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
(6S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate + NADP+ = 7,8-dihydrofolate + NADPH + H+
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
(6S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate
|
+
|
NADP(+)
|
=
|
7,8-dihydrofolate
Bound ligand (Het Group name = )
matches with 94.12% similarity
|
+
|
NADPH
|
+
|
H(+)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Biochemistry
35:7012-7020
(1996)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structures of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase complexed with 5-formyltetrahydrofolate (folinic acid) in two space groups: evidence for enolization of pteridine O4.
|
|
H.Lee,
V.M.Reyes,
J.Kraut.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The crystal structure of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase (ecDHFR, EC
1.5.1.3) as a binary complex with folinic acid
(5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate; also called leucovorin or citrovorum factor)
has been solved in two space groups, P6(1) and P6(5), with, respectively, two
molecules and one molecule per asymmetric unit. The crystal structures have been
refined to an R-factor of 14.2% at resolutions of 2.0 and 1.9 A. The P6(1)
structure is isomorphous with several previously reported ecDHFR binary
complexes [Bolin, J.T., Filman, D.J., Matthews, D.A., Hamlin, R.C., & Kraut,
J. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 13650-13662; Reyes, V.M., Sawaya, M.R., Brown,
K.A., & Kraut, J. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 2710-2723]; enzyme and ligand
conformations are very similar to the P6(1) 5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolate
complex. While the two enzyme subdomains of the P6(1) structure are nearly in
the closed conformation, exemplified by the methotrexate P6(1) binary complex,
in the P6(5) structure they are in an intermediate conformation, halfway between
the closed and the fully open conformation of the apoenzyme [Bystroff, C.,
Oatley, S.J., & Kraut, J. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 3263-3277]. Thus crystal
packing strongly influences this aspect of the enzyme structure. In contrast to
the P6(1) structure, in which the Met-20 loop (residues 9-23) is turned away
from the substrate binding pocket, in the P6(5) structure the Met-20 loop blocks
the pocket and protrudes into the cofactor binding site. In this respect, the
P6(5) structure is unique. Additionally, positioning of a Ca2+ ion (a component
of the crystallization medium) is different in the two crystal packings: in the
P6(1) structure it lies at the boundary between the two molecules of the
asymmetric unit, while in P6(5) it coordinates two water molecules, the hydroxyl
group of an ethanol molecule, and the backbone carbonyl oxygens of Glu-17,
Asn-18, and Met-20. The Ca2+ ion thus stabilizes a single turn of 3(10) helix
(residues 16-18 in the Met-20 loop), a second unique feature of the P6(5)
crystal structure. The disposition of the N5-formyl group in these structures
indicates formation, at least half of the time, of an intramolecular hydrogen
bond between the formyl oxygen and O4 of the tetrahydropterin ring. This
observation is consistent with the existence of an enol-keto equilibrium in
which the enolic tautomer is favored when a hydrogen-bond acceptor is present
between O4 and N5. Such would be the case whenever a water molecule occupies
that site as part of a hypothetical proton-relay mechanism. Two arginine side
chains, Arg-52 in the P6(5) structure and Arg-44 in molecule A of the P6(1)
structure, are turned away drastically from the ligand (p-aminobenzoyl)glutamic
acid moiety as compared with previously reported DHFR binary complex structures.
As in the ecDHFR dideazatetrahydrofolate complex, in both the P6(1) and P6(5)
structures a water molecule bridges pteridine O4 and Trp-22(N epsilon 1) with
ideal geometry for hydrogen bonding, perhaps contributing to the slow release of
5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate from the enzyme-product complex. When either the P6(1)
or the P6(5) structures are superimposed with the NADPH holoenzyme [Sawaya, M.
R. (1994) Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego], we find that
the distances between the nicotinamide C4 and pteridine C6 and C7 are very
short, 2.1 and 1.7 A in the P6(1) case and 2.0 and 1.4 A in the P6(5) case,
perhaps in part explaining the more rapid release of tetrahydrofolate from the
enzyme-product complex when NADPH is bound.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
D.D.Boehr,
D.McElheny,
H.J.Dyson,
and
P.E.Wright
(2010).
Millisecond timescale fluctuations in dihydrofolate reductase are exquisitely sensitive to the bound ligands.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
1373-1378.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.L.Mobley,
and
K.A.Dill
(2009).
Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get".
|
| |
Structure,
17,
489-498.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Binbuga,
A.F.Boroujerdi,
and
J.K.Young
(2007).
Structure in an extreme environment: NMR at high salt.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
16,
1783-1787.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Tehei,
J.C.Smith,
C.Monk,
J.Ollivier,
M.Oettl,
V.Kurkal,
J.L.Finney,
and
R.M.Daniel
(2006).
Dynamics of immobilized and native Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase by quasielastic neutron scattering.
|
| |
Biophys J,
90,
1090-1097.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.L.Cummins,
and
J.E.Gready
(2005).
Computational methods for the study of enzymic reaction mechanisms III: a perturbation plus QM/MM approach for calculating relative free energies of protonation.
|
| |
J Comput Chem,
26,
561-568.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Garcia-Viloca,
D.G.Truhlar,
and
J.Gao
(2003).
Reaction-path energetics and kinetics of the hydride transfer reaction catalyzed by dihydrofolate reductase.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
42,
13558-13575.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Shrimpton,
A.Mullaney,
and
R.K.Allemann
(2003).
Functional role for Tyr 31 in the catalytic cycle of chicken dihydrofolate reductase.
|
| |
Proteins,
51,
216-223.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Shrimpton,
and
R.K.Allemann
(2002).
Role of water in the catalytic cycle of E. coli dihydrofolate reductase.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
11,
1442-1451.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.T.Rajagopalan,
and
S.J.Benkovic
(2002).
Preorganization and protein dynamics in enzyme catalysis.
|
| |
Chem Rec,
2,
24-36.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.E.Trimmer,
D.P.Ballou,
M.L.Ludwig,
and
R.G.Matthews
(2001).
Folate activation and catalysis in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli: roles for aspartate 120 and glutamate 28.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
40,
6216-6226.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.G.Casarotto,
J.Basran,
R.Badii,
K.H.Sze,
and
G.C.Roberts
(1999).
Direct measurement of the pKa of aspartic acid 26 in Lactobacillus casei dihydrofolate reductase: implications for the catalytic mechanism.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
38,
8038-8044.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.R.Sawaya,
and
J.Kraut
(1997).
Loop and subdomain movements in the mechanism of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: crystallographic evidence.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
36,
586-603.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |