 |
PDBsum entry 1th0
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell cycle, hydrolase
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1th0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
12:1519-1531
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
A basis for SUMO protease specificity provided by analysis of human Senp2 and a Senp2-SUMO complex.
|
|
D.Reverter,
C.D.Lima.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Modification of cellular proteins by the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO is
essential for nuclear metabolism and cell cycle progression in yeast. X-ray
structures of the human Senp2 catalytic protease domain and of a covalent
thiohemiacetal transition-state complex obtained between the Senp2 catalytic
domain and SUMO-1 revealed details of the respective protease and substrate
surfaces utilized in interactions between these two proteins. Comparative
biochemical and structural analysis between Senp2 and the yeast SUMO protease
Ulp1 revealed differential abilities to process SUMO-1, SUMO-2, and SUMO-3 in
maturation and deconjugation reactions. Further biochemical characterization of
the three SUMO isoforms into which an additional Gly-Gly di-peptide was
inserted, or whereby the respective SUMO tails from the three isoforms were
swapped, suggests a strict dependence for SUMO isopeptidase activity on residues
C-terminal to the conserved Gly-Gly motif and preferred cleavage site for SUMO
proteases.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Structural Superposition of Senp2 and the
Senp2-SUMO-1 ComplexStereo representation of Senp2 alone (light
blue) and Senp2 (dark blue) in complex with SUMO-1 made by
superimposing the respective N-terminal Senp2 subdomains (see
text for amino acid numbers). SUMO-1 is represented by a thin
gray line. The Senp2 residues involved in interactions with
SUMO-1 are labeled and shown in bond representation.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figure is
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(2004,
12,
1519-1531)
copyright 2004.
|
|
| |
Figure was
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Hickey,
N.R.Wilson,
and
M.Hochstrasser
(2012).
Function and regulation of SUMO proteases.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
13,
755-766.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.D.Raymond,
M.E.Piper,
S.R.Gerrard,
and
J.L.Smith
(2010).
Structure of the Rift Valley fever virus nucleocapsid protein reveals another architecture for RNA encapsidation.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
11769-11774.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Van Damme,
K.Laukens,
T.H.Dang,
and
X.Van Ostade
(2010).
A manually curated network of the PML nuclear body interactome reveals an important role for PML-NBs in SUMOylation dynamics.
|
| |
Int J Biol Sci,
6,
51-67.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.Gareau,
and
C.D.Lima
(2010).
The SUMO pathway: emerging mechanisms that shape specificity, conjugation and recognition.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
11,
861-871.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Drag,
and
G.S.Salvesen
(2010).
Emerging principles in protease-based drug discovery.
|
| |
Nat Rev Drug Discov,
9,
690-701.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Senturia,
M.Faller,
S.Yin,
J.A.Loo,
D.Cascio,
M.R.Sawaya,
D.Hwang,
R.T.Clubb,
and
F.Guo
(2010).
Structure of the dimerization domain of DiGeorge critical region 8.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
19,
1354-1365.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Olsen,
A.D.Capili,
X.Lu,
D.S.Tan,
and
C.D.Lima
(2010).
Active site remodelling accompanies thioester bond formation in the SUMO E1.
|
| |
Nature,
463,
906-912.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.C.Shin,
B.Y.Liu,
J.Y.Tsai,
J.T.Wu,
L.K.Chang,
and
S.C.Chang
(2010).
Biochemical characterization of the small ubiquitin-like modifiers of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
|
| |
Planta,
232,
649-662.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.B.Carlson,
R.A.Horton,
and
K.W.Vogel
(2009).
A toolbox approach to high-throughput TR-FRET-based SUMOylation and DeSUMOylation assays.
|
| |
Assay Drug Dev Technol,
7,
348-355.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Reverter,
and
C.D.Lima
(2009).
Preparation of SUMO proteases and kinetic analysis using endogenous substrates.
|
| |
Methods Mol Biol,
497,
225-239.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.T.Yeh
(2009).
SUMOylation and De-SUMOylation: Wrestling with Life's Processes.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
8223-8227.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Pei,
and
N.V.Grishin
(2009).
The Rho GTPase inactivation domain in Vibrio cholerae MARTX toxin has a circularly permuted papain-like thiol protease fold.
|
| |
Proteins,
77,
413-419.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Wang,
D.Mukhopadhyay,
S.Mathew,
T.Hasebe,
R.A.Heimeier,
Y.Azuma,
N.Kolli,
Y.B.Shi,
K.D.Wilkinson,
and
M.Dasso
(2009).
Identification and developmental expression of Xenopus laevis SUMO proteases.
|
| |
PLoS One,
4,
e8462.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Wang,
and
M.Dasso
(2009).
SUMOylation and deSUMOylation at a glance.
|
| |
J Cell Sci,
122,
4249-4252.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Xu,
H.Y.Chan,
W.L.Lam,
K.H.Lam,
L.S.Lam,
T.B.Ng,
and
S.W.Au
(2009).
SUMO proteases: redox regulation and biological consequences.
|
| |
Antioxid Redox Signal,
11,
1453-1484.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.D.Lima,
and
D.Reverter
(2008).
Structure of the Human SENP7 Catalytic Domain and Poly-SUMO Deconjugation Activities for SENP6 and SENP7.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
32045-32055.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Meulmeester,
M.Kunze,
H.H.Hsiao,
H.Urlaub,
and
F.Melchior
(2008).
Mechanism and consequences for paralog-specific sumoylation of ubiquitin-specific protease 25.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
30,
610-619.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Drag,
and
G.S.Salvesen
(2008).
DeSUMOylating enzymes--SENPs.
|
| |
IUBMB Life,
60,
734-742.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Vethantham,
N.Rao,
and
J.L.Manley
(2008).
Sumoylation regulates multiple aspects of mammalian poly(A) polymerase function.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
22,
499-511.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Tang,
C.M.Hecker,
A.Scheschonka,
and
H.Betz
(2008).
Protein interactions in the sumoylation cascade: lessons from X-ray structures.
|
| |
FEBS J,
275,
3003-3015.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Capili,
and
C.D.Lima
(2007).
Structure and analysis of a complex between SUMO and Ubc9 illustrates features of a conserved E2-Ubl interaction.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
369,
608-618.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Capili,
and
C.D.Lima
(2007).
Taking it step by step: mechanistic insights from structural studies of ubiquitin/ubiquitin-like protein modification pathways.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
17,
726-735.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Mukhopadhyay,
and
M.Dasso
(2007).
Modification in reverse: the SUMO proteases.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
32,
286-295.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Mikolajczyk,
M.Drag,
M.Békés,
J.T.Cao,
Z.Ronai,
and
G.S.Salvesen
(2007).
Small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-specific proteases: profiling the specificities and activities of human SENPs.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
26217-26224.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Ihara,
H.Koyama,
Y.Uchimura,
H.Saitoh,
and
A.Kikuchi
(2007).
Noncovalent binding of small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) protease to SUMO is necessary for enzymatic activities and cell growth.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
16465-16475.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Chosed,
D.R.Tomchick,
C.A.Brautigam,
S.Mukherjee,
V.S.Negi,
M.Machius,
and
K.Orth
(2007).
Structural analysis of Xanthomonas XopD provides insights into substrate specificity of ubiquitin-like protein proteases.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
6773-6782.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Bawa-Khalfe,
J.Cheng,
Z.Wang,
and
E.T.Yeh
(2007).
Induction of the SUMO-specific protease 1 transcription by the androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
37341-37349.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Katritch,
C.M.Byrd,
V.Tseitin,
D.Dai,
E.Raush,
M.Totrov,
R.Abagyan,
R.Jordan,
and
D.E.Hruby
(2007).
Discovery of small molecule inhibitors of ubiquitin-like poxvirus proteinase I7L using homology modeling and covalent docking approaches.
|
| |
J Comput Aided Mol Des,
21,
549-558.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Mukhopadhyay,
F.Ayaydin,
N.Kolli,
S.H.Tan,
T.Anan,
A.Kametaka,
Y.Azuma,
K.D.Wilkinson,
and
M.Dasso
(2006).
SUSP1 antagonizes formation of highly SUMO2/3-conjugated species.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
174,
939-949.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Reverter,
and
C.D.Lima
(2006).
Structural basis for SENP2 protease interactions with SUMO precursors and conjugated substrates.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
1060-1068.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.T.Huang,
and
B.A.Schulman
(2006).
Breaking up with a kinky SUMO.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
1045-1047.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Shen,
M.H.Tatham,
C.Dong,
A.Zagórska,
J.H.Naismith,
and
R.T.Hay
(2006).
SUMO protease SENP1 induces isomerization of the scissile peptide bond.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
1069-1077.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Song,
S.Bhattacharya,
A.A.Yunus,
C.D.Lima,
and
C.Schindler
(2006).
Stat1 and SUMO modification.
|
| |
Blood,
108,
3237-3244.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Sulea,
H.A.Lindner,
and
R.Ménard
(2006).
Structural aspects of recently discovered viral deubiquitinating activities.
|
| |
Biol Chem,
387,
853-862.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Song,
Z.Zhang,
W.Hu,
and
Y.Chen
(2005).
Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) recognition of a SUMO binding motif: a reversal of the bound orientation.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
280,
40122-40129.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Sugawara,
N.N.Suzuki,
Y.Fujioka,
N.Mizushima,
Y.Ohsumi,
and
F.Inagaki
(2005).
Structural basis for the specificity and catalysis of human Atg4B responsible for mammalian autophagy.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
280,
40058-40065.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.M.Lois,
and
C.D.Lima
(2005).
Structures of the SUMO E1 provide mechanistic insights into SUMO activation and E2 recruitment to E1.
|
| |
EMBO J,
24,
439-451.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.N.Shen,
H.Liu,
C.Dong,
D.Xirodimas,
J.H.Naismith,
and
R.T.Hay
(2005).
Structural basis of NEDD8 ubiquitin discrimination by the deNEDDylating enzyme NEDP1.
|
| |
EMBO J,
24,
1341-1351.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Chupreta,
S.Holmstrom,
L.Subramanian,
and
J.A.Iñiguez-Lluhí
(2005).
A small conserved surface in SUMO is the critical structural determinant of its transcriptional inhibitory properties.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
25,
4272-4282.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |