 |
PDBsum entry 1th0
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell cycle, hydrolase
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1th0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
A basis for sumo protease specificity provided by analysis of human senp2 and a senp2-Sumo complex.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
D.Reverter,
C.D.Lima.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Structure, 2004,
12,
1519-1531.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Modification of cellular proteins by the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO is
essential for nuclear metabolism and cell cycle progression in yeast. X-ray
structures of the human Senp2 catalytic protease domain and of a covalent
thiohemiacetal transition-state complex obtained between the Senp2 catalytic
domain and SUMO-1 revealed details of the respective protease and substrate
surfaces utilized in interactions between these two proteins. Comparative
biochemical and structural analysis between Senp2 and the yeast SUMO protease
Ulp1 revealed differential abilities to process SUMO-1, SUMO-2, and SUMO-3 in
maturation and deconjugation reactions. Further biochemical characterization of
the three SUMO isoforms into which an additional Gly-Gly di-peptide was
inserted, or whereby the respective SUMO tails from the three isoforms were
swapped, suggests a strict dependence for SUMO isopeptidase activity on residues
C-terminal to the conserved Gly-Gly motif and preferred cleavage site for SUMO
proteases.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Structural Superposition of Senp2 and the
Senp2-SUMO-1 ComplexStereo representation of Senp2 alone (light
blue) and Senp2 (dark blue) in complex with SUMO-1 made by
superimposing the respective N-terminal Senp2 subdomains (see
text for amino acid numbers). SUMO-1 is represented by a thin
gray line. The Senp2 residues involved in interactions with
SUMO-1 are labeled and shown in bond representation.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figure is
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(2004,
12,
1519-1531)
copyright 2004.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |