 |
PDBsum entry 3gi4
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrolase/hydrolase inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3gi4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Evaluating the substrate-Envelope hypothesis: structural analysis of novel HIV-1 protease inhibitors designed to be robust against drug resistance.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
M.N.Nalam,
A.Ali,
M.D.Altman,
G.S.Reddy,
S.Chellappan,
V.Kairys,
A.Ozen,
H.Cao,
M.K.Gilson,
B.Tidor,
T.M.Rana,
C.A.Schiffer.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Virol, 2010,
84,
5368-5378.
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Drug resistance mutations in HIV-1 protease selectively alter inhibitor binding
without significantly affecting substrate recognition and cleavage. This
alteration in molecular recognition led us to develop the substrate-envelope
hypothesis which predicts that HIV-1 protease inhibitors that fit within the
overlapping consensus volume of the substrates are less likely to be susceptible
to drug-resistant mutations, as a mutation impacting such inhibitors would
simultaneously impact the processing of substrates. To evaluate this hypothesis,
over 130 HIV-1 protease inhibitors were designed and synthesized using three
different approaches with and without substrate-envelope constraints. A subset
of 16 representative inhibitors with binding affinities to wild-type protease
ranging from 58 nM to 0.8 pM was chosen for crystallographic analysis. The
inhibitor-protease complexes revealed that tightly binding inhibitors (at the
picomolar level of affinity) appear to "lock" into the protease active site by
forming hydrogen bonds to particular active-site residues. Both this hydrogen
bonding pattern and subtle variations in protein-ligand van der Waals
interactions distinguish nanomolar from picomolar inhibitors. In general,
inhibitors that fit within the substrate envelope, regardless of whether they
are picomolar or nanomolar, have flatter profiles with respect to drug-resistant
protease variants than inhibitors that protrude beyond the substrate envelope;
this provides a strong rationale for incorporating substrate-envelope
constraints into structure-based design strategies to develop new HIV-1 protease
inhibitors.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |