spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 3b45

Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands links
Membrane protein PDB id
3b45

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chain
180 a.a. *
Ligands
BNG ×17
Waters ×79
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
3b45
Name: Membrane protein
Title: Crystal structure of glpg at 1.9a resolution
Structure: Glpg. Chain: a. Fragment: core tm fragment, residues 91-270. Engineered: yes
Source: Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Gene: glpg. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008.
Resolution:
1.90Å     R-factor:   0.215     R-free:   0.228
Authors: Y.Wang,S.Maegawa,Y.Akiyama,Y.Ha
Key ref:
Y.Wang et al. (2007). The role of L1 loop in the mechanism of rhomboid intramembrane protease GlpG. J Mol Biol, 374, 1104-1113. PubMed id: 17976648 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.014
Date:
23-Oct-07     Release date:   22-Jan-08    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P09391  (GLPG_ECOLI) -  Rhomboid protease GlpG from Escherichia coli (strain K12)
Seq:
Struc:
276 a.a.
180 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class: E.C.3.4.21.105  - rhomboid protease.
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]

 

 
DOI no: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.014 J Mol Biol 374:1104-1113 (2007)
PubMed id: 17976648  
 
 
The role of L1 loop in the mechanism of rhomboid intramembrane protease GlpG.
Y.Wang, S.Maegawa, Y.Akiyama, Y.Ha.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Intramembrane proteases are important enzymes in biology. The recently solved crystal structures of rhomboid protease GlpG have provided useful insights into the mechanism of these membrane proteins. Besides revealing an internal water-filled cavity that harbored the Ser-His catalytic dyad, the crystal structure identified a novel structural domain (L1 loop) that lies on the side of the transmembrane helices. Here, using site-directed mutagenesis, we confirmed that the L1 loop is partially embedded in the membrane, and showed that alanine substitution of a highly preferred tryptophan (Trp136) at the distal tip of the L1 loop near the lipid:water interface reduced GlpG proteolytic activity. Crystallographic analysis showed that W136A mutation did not modify the structure of the protease. Instead, the polarity for a small and lipid-exposed protein surface at the site of the mutation has changed. The crystal structure, now refined at 1.7 A resolution, also clearly defined a 20-A-wide hydrophobic belt around the protease, which likely corresponded to the thickness of the compressed membrane bilayer around the protein. This improved structural model predicts that all critical elements of the catalysis, including the catalytic serine and the L5 cap, need to be positioned within a few angstroms of the membrane surface, and may explain why the protease activity is sensitive to changes in the protein:lipid interaction. Based on these findings, we propose a model where the end of the substrate transmembrane helix first partitions out of the hydrophobic core region of the membrane before it bends into the protease active site for cleavage.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. The crystal structure of W136A mutant. (a) Electron density, contoured at 1.5σ level, at the site of mutation. Water molecules are shown in red, and detergents in green. (b) The water molecules (numbered 1 to 6) substituting the indole ring of Trp136 are stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonds. (c) The structure of the wild type showing the interfacial location of Trp136. (d) After mutation, the protein surface is no longer compatible with its buried location.
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. The model of membrane-embedded GlpG. (a) The C^α trace of the protein is shown in yellow, externally bound water in red, and water inside the membrane protein in blue. The water molecules substituting for Trp136 in the mutant are shown in white. The two horizontal lines mark the boundaries of the hydrophobic core of the membrane around the protease. (b) A histogram of the number of water molecules observed across the bilayer in the same color scheme as in (a). (c) The location of various structural elements important for protease function within the lipid bilayer. Parts of L1 (marked by *) and TM helix S2 (**) are omitted to show the internal active site.
 
  The above figures are reprinted from an Open Access publication published by Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2007, 374, 1104-1113) copyright 2007.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21295583 C.L.Brooks, C.Lazareno-Saez, J.S.Lamoureux, M.W.Mak, and M.J.Lemieux (2011).
Insights into substrate gating in H. influenzae rhomboid.
  J Mol Biol, 407, 687-697.
PDB code: 3odj
21455272 C.Lazareno-Saez, C.L.Brooks, and M.J.Lemieux (2011).
Structural comparison of substrate entry gate for rhomboid intramembrane peptidases.
  Biochem Cell Biol, 89, 216-223.  
20219439 G.A.Papale, K.Nicholson, P.J.Hanson, M.Pavlovic, V.A.Drover, and D.Sahoo (2010).
Extracellular hydrophobic regions in scavenger receptor BI play a key role in mediating HDL-cholesterol transport.
  Arch Biochem Biophys, 496, 132-139.  
20890268 K.R.Vinothkumar, K.Strisovsky, A.Andreeva, Y.Christova, S.Verhelst, and M.Freeman (2010).
The structural basis for catalysis and substrate specificity of a rhomboid protease.
  EMBO J, 29, 3797-3809.
PDB codes: 2xov 2xow
20667175 K.R.Vinothkumar, and R.Henderson (2010).
Structures of membrane proteins.
  Q Rev Biophys, 43, 65.  
20070259 S.Urban (2010).
Taking the plunge: integrating structural, enzymatic and computational insights into a unified model for membrane-immersed rhomboid proteolysis.
  Biochem J, 425, 501-512.  
19278654 A.N.Bondar, C.del Val, and S.H.White (2009).
Rhomboid protease dynamics and lipid interactions.
  Structure, 17, 395-405.  
20064458 B.Amarneh, and R.B.Rawson (2009).
Rhomboid proteases: familiar features in unfamiliar phases.
  Mol Cell, 36, 922-923.  
19013149 C.P.Blobel, G.Carpenter, and M.Freeman (2009).
The role of protease activity in ErbB biology.
  Exp Cell Res, 315, 671-682.  
19458713 E.Erez, D.Fass, and E.Bibi (2009).
How intramembrane proteases bury hydrolytic reactions in the membrane.
  Nature, 459, 371-378.  
20064469 K.Strisovsky, H.J.Sharpe, and M.Freeman (2009).
Sequence-specific intramembrane proteolysis: identification of a recognition motif in rhomboid substrates.
  Mol Cell, 36, 1048-1059.  
19059492 Y.Ha (2009).
Structure and mechanism of intramembrane protease.
  Semin Cell Dev Biol, 20, 240-250.  
18268014 K.Koide, K.Ito, and Y.Akiyama (2008).
Substrate recognition and binding by RseP, an Escherichia coli intramembrane protease.
  J Biol Chem, 283, 9562-9570.  
18605900 M.Freeman (2008).
Rhomboid proteases and their biological functions.
  Annu Rev Genet, 42, 191-210.  
18979634 S.Urban, and R.P.Baker (2008).
In vivo analysis reveals substrate-gating mutants of a rhomboid intramembrane protease display increased activity in living cells.
  Biol Chem, 389, 1107-1115.  
18440799 S.Urban, and Y.Shi (2008).
Core principles of intramembrane proteolysis: comparison of rhomboid and site-2 family proteases.
  Curr Opin Struct Biol, 18, 432-441.  
18158892 M.K.Lemberg, and M.Freeman (2007).
Cutting proteins within lipid bilayers: rhomboid structure and mechanism.
  Mol Cell, 28, 930-940.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB code is shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer