 |
PDBsum entry 1ryp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multicatalytic proteinase
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1ryp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 1ryp
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 5067 90.2%
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 516 9.2%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 17 0.3%
Disallowed regions [XX] 18 0.3%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 5618 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 48
Glycine residues 526
Proline residues 194
----
Total number of residues 6386
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.22
Chi1-chi2 distribution -0.18
Chi1 only 0.01
Chi3 & chi4 0.42
Omega 0.51
0.10
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.54
Main-chain bond angles 0.29
0.40
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.22
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
|
