 |
PDBsum entry 1qrv
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gene regulation/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1qrv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
EMBO J
18:6610-6618
(1999)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The structure of a chromosomal high mobility group protein-DNA complex reveals sequence-neutral mechanisms important for non-sequence-specific DNA recognition.
|
|
F.V.Murphy,
R.M.Sweet,
M.E.Churchill.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The high mobility group (HMG) chromosomal proteins, which are common to all
eukaryotes, bind DNA in a non-sequence-specific fashion to promote chromatin
function and gene regulation. They interact directly with nucleosomes and are
believed to be modulators of chromatin structure. They are also important in
V(D)J recombination and in activating a number of regulators of gene expression,
including p53, Hox transcription factors and steroid hormone receptors, by
increasing their affinity for DNA. The X-ray crystal structure, at 2.2 A
resolution, of the HMG domain of the Drosophila melanogaster protein, HMG-D,
bound to DNA provides the first detailed view of a chromosomal HMG domain
interacting with linear DNA and reveals the molecular basis of
non-sequence-specific DNA recognition. Ser10 forms water-mediated hydrogen bonds
to DNA bases, and Val32 with Thr33 partially intercalates the DNA. These two
'sequence-neutral' mechanisms of DNA binding substitute for base-specific
hydrogen bonds made by equivalent residues of the sequence-specific HMG domain
protein, lymphoid enhancer factor-1. The use of multiple intercalations and
water-mediated DNA contacts may prove to be generally important mechanisms by
which chromosomal proteins bind to DNA in the minor groove.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1 Structure of the HMG-box of HMG-D bound to DNA. (A)
Sequence comparison of sequence-specific and
non-sequence-specific HMG domains. The sequences are aligned and
numbered according to the HMG-D structure, with helices, I, II
and II depicted by black boxes (Jones et al., 1994; Baxevanis
and Landsman, 1995). Residues shown from structural and modeling
studies to intercalate the DNA are outlined in black (Love et
al., 1995; Werner et al., 1995a,b; Balaeff et al., 1998; Allain
et al., 1999; Ohndorf et al., 1999). Residues that are conserved
between the two HMG-box families are shaded in gray, whereas
those residues that consistently differ between the two families
of HMG domains are highlighted in cyan and brown (Balaeff et
al., 1998; Churchill et al., 1999). (B) Stereo view of the
refined (2|F[o]| - |F[c]|) electron density map contoured at a
level of 1.9 .
The protein and DNA are colored using standard CPK coloring,
with water molecules and a sodium ion represented by red and
blue spheres, respectively. (C) Ribbon diagram in stereo view of
the complex. HMG-D is depicted in cyan, the DNA in gray, and
structural water molecules found in the protein and at the DNA
interface in red. Several side chains that interact with the
DNA, Ser10, Tyr12, Met13, Asn17, Arg20, Val32, Thr33 and Ala36,
are shown in green. The protein is well ordered from residue 4
to 72, and the DNA is well ordered throughout except for base
cytosine 10, which adopts two conformations in the crystal (only
one conformation is shown).
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3 Structural features involved in non-sequence-specific
DNA recognition. (A) View of HMG-D protein from this structure
(cyan) superimposed on the structure of the LEF-1 -DNA complex
(Love et al., 1995) (PDB accession No. 2lef; coral) in the same
orientation as Figure 1C. Side chains, selected on the basis of
their potential involvement in DNA specificity, are shown.
Detailed view of the interaction of residue 10 from both HMG-D
(B) and LEF-1 (C). HMG-D protein is in cyan, LEF-1 protein is in
coral, DNA is in gray, and black dashed lines depict proposed
hydrogen bonds with distances between donors and acceptors
shown. The Ser10 hydroxyl oxygen of HMG-D makes water-mediated
interactions with adenine 6 N3 and thymine 7 O4'. The LEF-1
Asn10 makes direct hydrogen bonds to guanine 9 N3 and thymine 8
O2 (in this LEF-1 model).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
EMBO J
(1999,
18,
6610-6618)
copyright 1999.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
DNA in chromatin is packaged and condensed into higher order structures. Through active and passive mechanisms it can be made accessible to factors involved in processes, such as transcription, DNA replication, and DNA repair, through a complex array of protein-DNA interactions, protein-protein interactions, and covalent modifications.
The chromosomal proteins that bind DNA directly and are important for the definition of chromatin structure and regulation of gene expression must be able to bind to many different DNA sequences. This is in contrast to better characterized proteins, such as transcription factors, that recognize a specific sequence of DNA. Histone H1 and the HMG-box proteins are examples of chromosomal proteins that bind to the linker DNA (between nucleosomes) and recognize distinct features of DNA structure, such as shape and flexibility. How do these proteins recognize DNA?
We have determined the structure of the complex of HMG-D bound to linear duplex DNA using X-ray crystallography (Figure 1). Through this structural analysis, we have learned how the Drosophila melanogaster HMG-box protein HMG-D binds to DNA non-sequence-specifically, and now understand many of the features of the protein that are important for protein induced DNA bending. HMG-D severely bends the DNA by binding and partially intercalating residues in the DNA minor groove. The structure of this non-sequence-specific protein-DNA complex is similar to homologous sequence-specific complexes, except for the lack of sequence-specific hydrogen bonds (Figure 3). Instead, hydrophobic interactions and water mediated non-specific hydrogen bonds stabilize the complex.
Mair Churchill
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
H.B.Ngo,
J.T.Kaiser,
and
D.C.Chan
(2011).
The mitochondrial transcription and packaging factor Tfam imposes a U-turn on mitochondrial DNA.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
1290-1296.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Vitagliano,
R.Berisio,
and
A.De Simone
(2011).
Role of hydration in collagen recognition by bacterial adhesins.
|
| |
Biophys J,
100,
2253-2261.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.L.Privalov,
A.I.Dragan,
and
C.Crane-Robinson
(2011).
Interpreting protein/DNA interactions: distinguishing specific from non-specific and electrostatic from non-electrostatic components.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
39,
2483-2491.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Zhang,
M.J.McCauley,
L.J.Maher,
M.C.Williams,
and
N.E.Israeloff
(2009).
Mechanism of DNA flexibility enhancement by HMGB proteins.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
37,
1107-1114.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.McCauley,
and
M.C.Williams
(2009).
Optical tweezers experiments resolve distinct modes of DNA-protein binding.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
91,
265-282.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.L.Privalov,
A.I.Dragan,
and
C.Crane-Robinson
(2009).
The cost of DNA bending.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
34,
464-470.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.A.Gangelhoff,
P.S.Mungalachetty,
J.C.Nix,
and
M.E.Churchill
(2009).
Structural analysis and DNA binding of the HMG domains of the human mitochondrial transcription factor A.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
37,
3153-3164.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Kiilerich,
C.Stemmer,
T.Merkle,
D.Launholt,
G.Gorr,
and
K.D.Grasser
(2008).
Chromosomal high mobility group (HMG) proteins of the HMGB-type occurring in the moss Physcomitrella patens.
|
| |
Gene,
407,
86-97.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.M.Abhyankar,
A.E.Hochreiter,
J.Hershey,
C.Evans,
Y.Zhang,
O.Crasta,
B.W.Sobral,
B.J.Mann,
W.A.Petri,
and
C.A.Gilchrist
(2008).
Characterization of an Entamoeba histolytica high-mobility-group box protein induced during intestinal infection.
|
| |
Eukaryot Cell,
7,
1565-1572.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.A.Becker,
J.D.Kahn,
and
L.J.Maher
(2008).
Eukaryotic HMGB proteins as replacements for HU in E. coli repression loop formation.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
36,
4009-4021.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.C.Roemer,
J.Adelman,
M.E.Churchill,
and
D.P.Edwards
(2008).
Mechanism of high-mobility group protein B enhancement of progesterone receptor sequence-specific DNA binding.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
36,
3655-3666.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.P.Haugen,
W.Ross,
M.Manrique,
and
R.L.Gourse
(2008).
Fine structure of the promoter-sigma region 1.2 interaction.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
3292-3297.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Y.Stefanovsky,
and
T.Moss
(2008).
The splice variants of UBF differentially regulate RNA polymerase I transcription elongation in response to ERK phosphorylation.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
36,
5093-5101.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Travers,
and
G.Muskhelishvili
(2007).
A common topology for bacterial and eukaryotic transcription initiation?
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
8,
147-151.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.A.Kaufman,
N.Durisic,
J.M.Mativetsky,
S.Costantino,
M.A.Hancock,
P.Grutter,
and
E.A.Shoubridge
(2007).
The mitochondrial transcription factor TFAM coordinates the assembly of multiple DNA molecules into nucleoid-like structures.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
18,
3225-3236.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Rong,
Y.Li,
X.Shi,
X.Zhang,
Y.Gao,
H.Dai,
M.Teng,
L.Niu,
Q.Liu,
and
Q.Hao
(2007).
Structure of human upstream binding factor HMG box 5 and site for binding of the cell-cycle regulatory factor TAF1.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
63,
730-737.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.McCauley,
J.Zimmerman,
L.J.Maher,
and
M.C.Williams
(2007).
HMGB binding to DNA: single and double box motifs.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
374,
993.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.McCauley,
and
M.C.Williams
(2007).
Mechanisms of DNA binding determined in optical tweezers experiments.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
85,
154-168.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Kucej,
and
R.A.Butow
(2007).
Evolutionary tinkering with mitochondrial nucleoids.
|
| |
Trends Cell Biol,
17,
586-592.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.L.Privalov,
A.I.Dragan,
C.Crane-Robinson,
K.J.Breslauer,
D.P.Remeta,
and
C.A.Minetti
(2007).
What drives proteins into the major or minor grooves of DNA?
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
365,
1-9.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Lefebvre,
B.Dumitriu,
A.Penzo-Méndez,
Y.Han,
and
B.Pallavi
(2007).
Control of cell fate and differentiation by Sry-related high-mobility-group box (Sox) transcription factors.
|
| |
Int J Biochem Cell Biol,
39,
2195-2214.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Singh,
L.D'Silva,
and
T.A.Holak
(2006).
DNA-binding properties of the recombinant high-mobility-group-like AT-hook-containing region from human BRG1 protein.
|
| |
Biol Chem,
387,
1469-1478.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Zacharias
(2006).
Minor groove deformability of DNA: a molecular dynamics free energy simulation study.
|
| |
Biophys J,
91,
882-891.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Briquet,
C.Boschet,
M.Gissot,
E.Tissandié,
E.Sevilla,
J.F.Franetich,
I.Thiery,
Z.Hamid,
C.Bourgouin,
and
C.Vaquero
(2006).
High-mobility-group box nuclear factors of Plasmodium falciparum.
|
| |
Eukaryot Cell,
5,
672-682.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Rowland,
M.R.Boocock,
and
W.M.Stark
(2006).
DNA bending in the Sin recombination synapse: functional replacement of HU by IHF.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
59,
1730-1743.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Y.Chen,
T.P.Ko,
T.W.Lin,
C.C.Chou,
C.J.Chen,
and
A.H.Wang
(2005).
Probing the DNA kink structure induced by the hyperthermophilic chromosomal protein Sac7d.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
33,
430-438.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.McCauley,
P.R.Hardwidge,
L.J.Maher,
and
M.C.Williams
(2005).
Dual binding modes for an HMG domain from human HMGB2 on DNA.
|
| |
Biophys J,
89,
353-364.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.T.Dame,
J.van Mameren,
M.S.Luijsterburg,
M.E.Mysiak,
A.Janićijević,
G.Pazdzior,
P.C.van der Vliet,
C.Wyman,
and
G.J.Wuite
(2005).
Analysis of scanning force microscopy images of protein-induced DNA bending using simulations.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
33,
e68.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Dai,
B.Wong,
Y.M.Yen,
M.A.Oettinger,
J.Kwon,
and
R.C.Johnson
(2005).
Determinants of HMGB proteins required to promote RAG1/2-recombination signal sequence complex assembly and catalysis during V(D)J recombination.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
25,
4413-4425.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Kamau,
K.T.Bauerle,
and
A.Grove
(2004).
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group box protein HMO1 contains two functional DNA binding domains.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
55234-55240.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.J.Lou,
J.R.Brister,
J.J.Li,
W.Chen,
N.Muzyczka,
and
W.Tan
(2004).
Adeno-associated virus Rep78/Rep68 promotes localized melting of the rep binding element in the absence of adenosine triphosphate.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
5,
324-332.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.H.Eastberg,
J.Pelletier,
and
B.L.Stoddard
(2004).
Recognition of DNA substrates by T4 bacteriophage polynucleotide kinase.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
32,
653-660.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Reményi,
K.Lins,
L.J.Nissen,
R.Reinbold,
H.R.Schöler,
and
M.Wilmanns
(2003).
Crystal structure of a POU/HMG/DNA ternary complex suggests differential assembly of Oct4 and Sox2 on two enhancers.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
17,
2048-2059.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Serban,
J.M.Benevides,
and
G.J.Thomas
(2003).
HU protein employs similar mechanisms of minor-groove recognition in binding to different B-DNA sites: demonstration by Raman spectroscopy.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
42,
7390-7399.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.O'Flaherty,
and
J.Kaye
(2003).
TOX defines a conserved subfamily of HMG-box proteins.
|
| |
BMC Genomics,
4,
13.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Klass,
F.V.Murphy,
S.Fouts,
M.Serenil,
A.Changela,
J.Siple,
and
M.E.Churchill
(2003).
The role of intercalating residues in chromosomal high-mobility-group protein DNA binding, bending and specificity.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
31,
2852-2864.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.J.Lu,
and
W.K.Olson
(2003).
3DNA: a software package for the analysis, rebuilding and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic acid structures.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
31,
5108-5121.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Kanaya,
N.Nakajima,
and
K.Okada
(2002).
Non-sequence-specific DNA binding by the FILAMENTOUS FLOWER protein from Arabidopsis thaliana is reduced by EDTA.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
277,
11957-11964.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.McKinney,
and
C.Prives
(2002).
Efficient specific DNA binding by p53 requires both its central and C-terminal domains as revealed by studies with high-mobility group 1 protein.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
22,
6797-6808.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Mitsouras,
B.Wong,
C.Arayata,
R.C.Johnson,
and
M.Carey
(2002).
The DNA architectural protein HMGB1 displays two distinct modes of action that promote enhanceosome assembly.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
22,
4390-4401.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.M.Bharath,
N.R.Chandra,
and
M.R.Rao
(2002).
Prediction of an HMG-box fold in the C-terminal domain of histone H1: insights into its role in DNA condensation.
|
| |
Proteins,
49,
71-81.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.H.Fang,
Y.M.Yao,
Z.G.Shi,
Y.Yu,
Y.Wu,
L.R.Lu,
and
Z.Y.Sheng
(2002).
The significance of changes in high mobility group-1 protein mRNA expression in rats after thermal injury.
|
| |
Shock,
17,
329-333.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Lv,
D.D.Xu,
D.P.Liu,
L.Li,
D.L.Hao,
and
C.C.Liang
(2002).
High-mobility group protein 2 may be involved in the locus control region regulation of the beta-globin gene cluster.
|
| |
Biochem Cell Biol,
80,
765-770.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Hillisch,
M.Lorenz,
and
S.Diekmann
(2001).
Recent advances in FRET: distance determination in protein-DNA complexes.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
11,
201-207.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.W.Garvie,
and
C.Wolberger
(2001).
Recognition of specific DNA sequences.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
8,
937-946.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.O.Thomas,
and
A.A.Travers
(2001).
HMG1 and 2, and related 'architectural' DNA-binding proteins.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
26,
167-174.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Dailey,
and
C.Basilico
(2001).
Coevolution of HMG domains and homeodomains and the generation of transcriptional regulation by Sox/POU complexes.
|
| |
J Cell Physiol,
186,
315-328.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Stros
(2001).
Two mutations of basic residues within the N-terminus of HMG-1 B domain with different effects on DNA supercoiling and binding to bent DNA.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
40,
4769-4779.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.D.Cary,
C.M.Read,
B.Davis,
P.C.Driscoll,
and
C.Crane-Robinson
(2001).
Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the DNA-binding domain of mouse Sox-5.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
10,
83-98.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Cerdan,
D.Payet,
J.C.Yang,
A.A.Travers,
and
D.Neuhaus
(2001).
HMG-D complexed to a bulge DNA: an NMR model.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
10,
504-518.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Y.Stefanovsky,
G.Pelletier,
D.P.Bazett-Jones,
C.Crane-Robinson,
and
T.Moss
(2001).
DNA looping in the RNA polymerase I enhancesome is the result of non-cooperative in-phase bending by two UBF molecules.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
29,
3241-3247.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Y.Stefanovsky,
G.Pelletier,
R.Hannan,
T.Gagnon-Kugler,
L.I.Rothblum,
and
T.Moss
(2001).
An immediate response of ribosomal transcription to growth factor stimulation in mammals is mediated by ERK phosphorylation of UBF.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
8,
1063-1073.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Travers
(2000).
Recognition of distorted DNA structures by HMG domains.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
10,
102-109.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.R.Jamieson,
and
S.J.Lippard
(2000).
Stopped-flow fluorescence studies of HMG-domain protein binding to cisplatin-modified DNA.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
39,
8426-8438.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.V.Murphy,
and
M.E.Churchill
(2000).
Nonsequence-specific DNA recognition: a structural perspective.
|
| |
Structure,
8,
R83-R89.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Xin,
S.Taudte,
N.R.Kallenbach,
M.P.Limbach,
and
R.S.Zitomer
(2000).
DNA binding by single HMG box model proteins.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
28,
4044-4050.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.B.Ellwood,
Y.M.Yen,
R.C.Johnson,
and
M.Carey
(2000).
Mechanism for specificity by HMG-1 in enhanceosome assembly.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
20,
4359-4370.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Röttgers,
N.M.Krohn,
J.Lichota,
C.Stemmer,
T.Merkle,
and
K.D.Grasser
(2000).
DNA-interactions and nuclear localisation of the chromosomal HMG domain protein SSRP1 from maize.
|
| |
Plant J,
23,
395-405.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.K.Dow,
D.N.Jones,
S.A.Wolfe,
G.L.Verdine,
and
M.E.Churchill
(2000).
Structural studies of the high mobility group globular domain and basic tail of HMG-D bound to disulfide cross-linked DNA.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
39,
9725-9736.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.M.Luscombe,
S.E.Austin,
H.M.Berman,
and
J.M.Thornton
(2000).
An overview of the structures of protein-DNA complexes.
|
| |
Genome Biol,
1,
REVIEWS001.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.He,
U.M.Ohndorf,
and
S.J.Lippard
(2000).
Intercalating residues determine the mode of HMG1 domains A and B binding to cisplatin-modified DNA.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
39,
14426-14435.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |