 |
PDBsum entry 6dfb
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA binding protein/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
6dfb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Biochemistry
59:1909-1926
(2020)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
A Conformational Switch in the Zinc Finger Protein Kaiso Mediates Differential Readout of Specific and Methylated DNA Sequences.
|
|
E.N.Nikolova,
R.L.Stanfield,
H.J.Dyson,
P.E.Wright.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Recognition of the epigenetic mark 5-methylcytosine (mC) at CpG sites in DNA has
emerged as a novel function of many eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs). It
remains unclear why the sequence specificity of these TFs differs for
CpG-methylated motifs and consensus motifs. Here, we dissect the structural and
dynamic basis for this differential DNA binding specificity in the human zinc
finger TF Kaiso, which exhibits high affinity for two consecutive mCpG sites in
variable contexts and also for a longer, sequence-specific Kaiso binding site
(KBS). By integrating structural analysis and DNA binding studies with targeted
protein mutagenesis and nucleotide substitutions, we identify distinct
mechanisms for readout of methylated and KBS motifs by Kaiso. We show that a key
glutamate residue (E535), critical for mCpG site recognition, adopts different
conformations in complexes with specific and methylated DNA. These
conformational differences, together with intrinsic variations in DNA
flexibility and/or solvation at TpG versus mCpG sites, contribute to the
different DNA affinity and sequence specificity. With methylated DNA, multiple
direct contacts between E535 and the 5' mCpG site dominate the binding affinity,
allowing for tolerance of different flanking DNA sequences. With KBS, Kaiso
employs E535 as part of an indirect screen of the 5' flanking sequence, relying
on key tyrosine-DNA interactions to stabilize an optimal DNA conformation and
select against noncognate sites. These findings demonstrate how TFs use
conformational adaptation and exploit variations in DNA flexibility to achieve
distinct DNA readout outcomes and target a greater variety of regulatory and
epigenetic sites than previously appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
');
}
}
 |