 |
PDBsum entry 4axn
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Hydrolase
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Hallmarks of processive and non-processive glycoside hydrolases revealed from computational and crystallographic studies of the serratia marcescens chitinases
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Chitinase c1. Chain: a, b. Fragment: residues 1-328. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Serratia marcescens. Organism_taxid: 615. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.68Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.186
|
R-free:
|
0.216
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
C.M.Payne,J.Baban,B.Synstad,P.H.Backe,A.S.Arvai,B.Dalhus,M.Bjoras, V.G.H.Eijsink,M.Sorlie,G.T.Beckham,G.Vaaje-Kolstad
|
|
Key ref:
|
 |
C.M.Payne
et al.
(2012).
Hallmarks of processivity in glycoside hydrolases from crystallographic and computational studies of the Serratia marcescens chitinases.
J Biol Chem,
287,
36322-36330.
PubMed id:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
13-Jun-12
|
Release date:
|
05-Sep-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q700B8
(Q700B8_SERMA) -
Chitinase C1 from Serratia marcescens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
480 a.a.
316 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.3.2.1.14
- chitinase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Hydrolysis of the 1,4-beta-linkages of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine polymers of chitin.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
J Biol Chem
287:36322-36330
(2012)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Hallmarks of processivity in glycoside hydrolases from crystallographic and computational studies of the Serratia marcescens chitinases.
|
|
C.M.Payne,
J.Baban,
S.J.Horn,
P.H.Backe,
A.S.Arvai,
B.Dalhus,
M.Bjørås,
V.G.Eijsink,
M.Sørlie,
G.T.Beckham,
G.Vaaje-Kolstad.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides in nature is typically accomplished
by mixtures of processive and nonprocessive glycoside hydrolases (GHs), which
exhibit synergistic activity wherein nonprocessive enzymes provide new sites for
productive attachment of processive enzymes. GH processivity is typically
attributed to active site geometry, but previous work has demonstrated that
processivity can be tuned by point mutations or removal of single loops. To gain
additional insights into the differences between processive and nonprocessive
enzymes that give rise to their synergistic activities, this study reports the
crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the GH family 18 nonprocessive
endochitinase, ChiC, from Serratia marcescens. This completes the structural
characterization of the co-evolved chitinolytic enzymes from this bacterium and
enables structural analysis of their complementary functions. The ChiC catalytic
module reveals a shallow substrate-binding cleft that lacks aromatic residues
vital for processivity, a calcium-binding site not previously seen in GH18
chitinases, and, importantly, a displaced catalytic acid (Glu-141), suggesting
flexibility in the catalytic center. Molecular dynamics simulations of two
processive chitinases (ChiA and ChiB), the ChiC catalytic module, and an
endochitinase from Lactococcus lactis show that the nonprocessive enzymes have
more flexible catalytic machineries and that their bound ligands are more
solvated and flexible. These three features, which relate to the more dynamic
on-off ligand binding processes associated with nonprocessive action, correlate
to experimentally measured differences in processivity of the S. marcescens
chitinases. These newly defined hallmarks thus appear to be key dynamic metrics
in determining processivity in GH enzymes complementing structural insights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
');
}
}
 |