 |
PDBsum entry 2pie
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.2.3.2.27
- RING-type E3 ubiquitin transferase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
S-ubiquitinyl-[E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme]-L-cysteine + [acceptor protein]-L-lysine = [E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme]-L-cysteine + N6- ubiquitinyl-[acceptor protein]-L-lysine
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Cell
131:901-914
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly.
|
|
M.S.Huen,
R.Grant,
I.Manke,
K.Minn,
X.Yu,
M.B.Yaffe,
J.Chen.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
DNA-damage signaling utilizes a multitude of posttranslational modifiers as
molecular switches to regulate cell-cycle checkpoints, DNA repair, cellular
senescence, and apoptosis. Here we show that RNF8, a FHA/RING domain-containing
protein, plays a critical role in the early DNA-damage response. We have solved
the X-ray crystal structure of the FHA domain structure at 1.35 A. We have shown
that RNF8 facilitates the accumulation of checkpoint mediator proteins BRCA1 and
53BP1 to the damaged chromatin, on one hand through the phospho-dependent FHA
domain-mediated binding of RNF8 to MDC1, on the other hand via its role in
ubiquitylating H2AX and possibly other substrates at damage sites. Moreover,
RNF8-depleted cells displayed a defective G2/M checkpoint and increased IR
sensitivity. Together, our study implicates RNF8 as a novel
DNA-damage-responsive protein that integrates protein phosphorylation and
ubiquitylation signaling and plays a critical role in the cellular response to
genotoxic stress.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Structural Basis for Phosphorylation-Dependent
Binding by RNF8 FHA Domain (A) Amino acid selectivity
values for the RNF8 FHA domain determined using the
phosphothreonine-oriented degenerate peptide library
MAXXXX-pT-XXXXAKKK, where X indicates all amino acids except
Cys. Values ≥ 1.4 indicate moderate selection; values ≥ 2.0
indicate strong selection. (B) Cartoon representation of
the RNF8 FHA domain bound to the optimal phosphopeptide
ELKpTERY. (C) stereo view of the phosphopeptide-binding
surface. (D) Closeup of the phosphate-binding pocket, with
2Fo-Fc density map contoured at 2σ. A bound water molecule is
evident in the upper center. (E–G) Molecular interaction
surfaces of the RNF8:phosphopeptide complex, the MDC1 tandem
BRCT domain:γ-H[2]AX phosphopeptide complex, and the Rad53
FHA1:LEVpTEAD phosphopeptide complex. Peptide surfaces are
contoured in salmon, protein surfaces are contoured in lime. In
the RNF8 FHA domain (E), selection for Tyr over Phe in the +3
position likely results from a water-mediated contact between
the Tyr hydroxyl and the backbone nitrogen of Leu57. In the
Rad53 FHA1 structure (G), an Arg residue from the FHA domain
occupies the equivalent position as the peptide +3 Tyr in the
RNF8 structure (dashed line). (H) Divergence in the
phospho-amino acid +3 binding surfaces of the FHA domains of
RNF8 and Rad53. The Cα traces of the FHA domains of the RNF8
FHA domain:phosphopeptide complex and the Rad53 FHA1
domain:phosphopeptide complex were optimally aligned. The
phosphopeptide +3 interacting region is shown in cartoon
representation, with the RNF8 FHA domain shaded blue and its
bound phosphopeptide shaded cyan, while the Rad53 FHA1 domain is
shaded yellow and its bound phosphopeptide is shaded green. The
+3 Tyr residue in the RNF8 optimal phosphopeptide and the +3 Asp
in the Rad53 FHA1 optimal phosphopeptide are shown in stick
representation. Note that the +3 Tyr binding site in RNF8 is
occluded in the Rad53 FHA domain by an Arg residue that mediates
selection for Asp in the +3 position.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. RNF8 Is Required for H2AX Ubiquitylation following
DNA Damage (A) H2AX is ubiquitylated in vivo. 293T cells
were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding myc-tagged
ubiquitin with or without plasmids encoding SBP-Flag-H2AX.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting were carried out using
indicated antibodies. Black arrow indicates doubly ubiquitylated
species of H2AX, while gray arrow indicates monoubiquitinated
H2AX. Multiple-ubiquitinated H2AX species are also pointed out.
(B) HeLa cells stably expressing HA-tagged H2AX were
transfected with control siRNA or RNF8 siRNA were treated with
10 Gy or left untreated. Cells were harvested 1 hr
post-irradiation. Cell lysates were prepared, separated by
SDS-PAGE, and blotted with indicated antibodies. (C) HeLa
cells transfected with control siRNA or RNF8 siRNA were treated
as described in (B) and immunoblotting experiments were carried
out using indicated antibodies. (D) IR-induced H2AX
ubiquitylation in H2AX^+/+ and H2AX^−/− MEFs. Cell lysates
prepared from WT or H2AX^−/− cells before and after
irradiation were immunoblotted with anti-H2AX and anti-pH2AX
antibodies. (E) IR-induced H2AX ubiquitylation requires
H2AX phosphorylation. H2AX-deficient MEFs stably expressing
HA-tagged H2AX or S139A mutant of H2AX were treated with 0 Gy or
10 Gy and immunoblotting was performed using indicated
antibodies. (F) IR-induced H2AX ubiquitylation requires
RNF8 FHA and RING domains. Experiments were carried out as that
described in Figure 4C. Immunoblotting experiments were
conducted with antibodies as indicated. Arrow indicates
ubiquitylated species of H2AX that only appear after radiation
in cells expressing WT RNF8.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Cell Press:
Cell
(2007,
131,
901-914)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
L.Feng,
and
J.Chen
(2012).
The E3 ligase RNF8 regulates KU80 removal and NHEJ repair.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
19,
201-206.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Papamichos-Chronakis,
and
C.L.Peterson
(2012).
Chromatin and the genome integrity network.
|
| |
Nat Rev Genet,
14,
62-75.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Bothmer,
D.F.Robbiani,
M.Di Virgilio,
S.F.Bunting,
I.A.Klein,
N.Feldhahn,
J.Barlow,
H.T.Chen,
D.Bosque,
E.Callen,
A.Nussenzweig,
and
M.C.Nussenzweig
(2011).
Regulation of DNA End Joining, Resection, and Immunoglobulin Class Switch Recombination by 53BP1.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
42,
319-329.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.E.Johnson,
and
K.L.Gould
(2011).
Dma1 ubiquitinates the SIN scaffold, Sid4, to impede the mitotic localization of Plo1 kinase.
|
| |
EMBO J,
30,
341-354.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Urquhart,
M.Gatei,
D.J.Richard,
and
K.K.Khanna
(2011).
ATM mediated phosphorylation of CHD4 contributes to genome maintenance.
|
| |
Genome Integr,
2,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Y.Shuen,
and
W.D.Foulkes
(2011).
Inherited mutations in breast cancer genes--risk and response.
|
| |
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia,
16,
3.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Orlowski,
L.J.Mah,
R.S.Vasireddy,
A.El-Osta,
and
T.C.Karagiannis
(2011).
Double-strand breaks and the concept of short- and long-term epigenetic memory.
|
| |
Chromosoma,
120,
129-149.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Kopanja,
N.Roy,
T.Stoyanova,
R.A.Hess,
S.Bagchi,
and
P.Raychaudhuri
(2011).
Cul4A is essential for spermatogenesis and male fertility.
|
| |
Dev Biol,
352,
278-287.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Pei,
L.Zhang,
K.Luo,
Y.Qin,
M.Chesi,
F.Fei,
P.L.Bergsagel,
L.Wang,
Z.You,
and
Z.Lou
(2011).
MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites.
|
| |
Nature,
470,
124-128.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Wang,
Z.Gong,
and
J.Chen
(2011).
MDC1 collaborates with TopBP1 in DNA replication checkpoint control.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
193,
267-273.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Wu,
Y.Chen,
L.Y.Lu,
Y.Wu,
M.T.Paulsen,
M.Ljungman,
D.O.Ferguson,
and
X.Yu
(2011).
Chfr and RNF8 synergistically regulate ATM activation.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
761-768.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Acs,
M.S.Luijsterburg,
L.Ackermann,
F.A.Salomons,
T.Hoppe,
and
N.P.Dantuma
(2011).
The AAA-ATPase VCP/p97 promotes 53BP1 recruitment by removing L3MBTL1 from DNA double-strand breaks.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
1345-1350.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Nakamura,
A.Kato,
J.Kobayashi,
H.Yanagihara,
S.Sakamoto,
D.V.Oliveira,
M.Shimada,
H.Tauchi,
H.Suzuki,
S.Tashiro,
L.Zou,
and
K.Komatsu
(2011).
Regulation of homologous recombination by RNF20-dependent H2B ubiquitination.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
41,
515-528.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.H.Peuscher,
and
J.J.Jacobs
(2011).
DNA-damage response and repair activities at uncapped telomeres depend on RNF8.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol,
13,
1139-1145.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.M.Blundred,
and
G.S.Stewart
(2011).
DNA double-strand break repair, immunodeficiency and the RIDDLE syndrome.
|
| |
Expert Rev Clin Immunol,
7,
169-185.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Rai,
J.M.Li,
H.Zheng,
G.T.Lok,
Y.Deng,
M.S.Huen,
J.Chen,
J.Jin,
and
S.Chang
(2011).
The E3 ubiquitin ligase Rnf8 stabilizes Tpp1 to promote telomere end protection.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
1400-1407.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Fnu,
E.A.Williamson,
L.P.De Haro,
M.Brenneman,
J.Wray,
M.Shaheen,
K.Radhakrishnan,
S.H.Lee,
J.A.Nickoloff,
and
R.Hromas
(2011).
Methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 enhances DNA repair by nonhomologous end-joining.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
108,
540-545.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Nakada
(2011).
Abnormalities in DNA double-strand break response beyond primary immunodeficiency.
|
| |
Int J Hematol,
93,
425-433.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Ma,
J.A.Keller,
and
X.Yu
(2011).
RNF8-dependent histone ubiquitination during DNA damage response and spermatogenesis.
|
| |
Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai),
43,
339-345.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Ciccia,
and
S.J.Elledge
(2010).
The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
40,
179-204.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Ishikawa,
M.Yamauchi,
K.Suzuki,
and
S.Yamashita
(2010).
Image-based quantitative determination of DNA damage signal reveals a threshold for G2 checkpoint activation in response to ionizing radiation.
|
| |
Genome Integr,
1,
10.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Nakamura,
V.A.Rao,
Y.Pommier,
and
W.M.Bonner
(2010).
The complexity of phosphorylated H2AX foci formation and DNA repair assembly at DNA double-strand breaks.
|
| |
Cell Cycle,
9,
389-397.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.R.Venkitaraman
(2010).
Modifying chromatin architecture during the response to DNA breakage.
|
| |
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol,
45,
2.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.E.Lilley,
M.S.Chaurushiya,
C.Boutell,
S.Landry,
J.Suh,
S.Panier,
R.D.Everett,
G.S.Stewart,
D.Durocher,
and
M.D.Weitzman
(2010).
A viral E3 ligase targets RNF8 and RNF168 to control histone ubiquitination and DNA damage responses.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
943-955.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.E.Lilley,
M.S.Chaurushiya,
and
M.D.Weitzman
(2010).
Chromatin at the intersection of viral infection and DNA damage.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1799,
319-327.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.H.Larsen,
C.Poinsignon,
T.Gudjonsson,
C.Dinant,
M.R.Payne,
F.J.Hari,
J.M.Danielsen,
P.Menard,
J.C.Sand,
M.Stucki,
C.Lukas,
J.Bartek,
J.S.Andersen,
and
J.Lukas
(2010).
The chromatin-remodeling factor CHD4 coordinates signaling and repair after DNA damage.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
190,
731-740.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.J.Huggins,
G.J.McKenzie,
D.D.Robinson,
A.J.Narváez,
B.Hardwick,
M.Roberts-Thomson,
A.R.Venkitaraman,
G.H.Grant,
and
M.C.Payne
(2010).
Computational analysis of phosphopeptide binding to the polo-box domain of the mitotic kinase PLK1 using molecular dynamics simulation.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
6,
0.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.M.Chou,
B.Adamson,
N.E.Dephoure,
X.Tan,
A.C.Nottke,
K.E.Hurov,
S.P.Gygi,
M.P.Colaiácovo,
and
S.J.Elledge
(2010).
A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
18475-18480.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.A.Mallette,
V.Calabrese,
S.Ilangumaran,
and
G.Ferbeyre
(2010).
SOCS1, a novel interaction partner of p53 controlling oncogene-induced senescence.
|
| |
Aging (Albany NY),
2,
445-452.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Coster,
and
M.Goldberg
(2010).
The cellular response to DNA damage: A focus on MDC1 and its interacting proteins.
|
| |
Nucleus,
1,
166-178.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Gerlitz
(2010).
HMGNs, DNA repair and cancer.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1799,
80-85.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Smeenk,
W.W.Wiegant,
H.Vrolijk,
A.P.Solari,
A.Pastink,
and
H.van Attikum
(2010).
The NuRD chromatin-remodeling complex regulates signaling and repair of DNA damage.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
190,
741-749.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Asakawa,
H.Koizumi,
A.Koike,
M.Takahashi,
W.Wu,
H.Iwase,
M.Fukuda,
and
T.Ohta
(2010).
Prediction of breast cancer sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on status of DNA damage repair proteins.
|
| |
Breast Cancer Res,
12,
R17.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.D.Ulrich,
and
H.Walden
(2010).
Ubiquitin signalling in DNA replication and repair.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
11,
479-489.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.S.Lee,
J.H.Park,
S.J.Kim,
S.J.Kwon,
and
J.Kwon
(2010).
A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, gamma-H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double-strand break repair.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
1434-1445.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.H.Ismail,
C.Andrin,
D.McDonald,
and
M.J.Hendzel
(2010).
BMI1-mediated histone ubiquitylation promotes DNA double-strand break repair.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
191,
45-60.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Pirngruber,
and
S.A.Johnsen
(2010).
Induced G1 cell-cycle arrest controls replication-dependent histone mRNA 3' end processing through p21, NPAT and CDK9.
|
| |
Oncogene,
29,
2853-2863.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Wu,
L.Y.Lu,
and
X.Yu
(2010).
The role of BRCA1 in DNA damage response.
|
| |
Protein Cell,
1,
117-123.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Yuan,
and
J.Chen
(2010).
MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex dictates DNA repair independent of H2AX.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
1097-1104.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.M.Miller,
J.V.Tjeertes,
J.Coates,
G.Legube,
S.E.Polo,
S.Britton,
and
S.P.Jackson
(2010).
Human HDAC1 and HDAC2 function in the DNA-damage response to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
17,
1144-1151.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Suzuki,
M.Nakashima,
and
S.Yamashita
(2010).
Dynamics of ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage response in reconstituted three-dimensional human skin tissue.
|
| |
Radiat Res,
174,
415-423.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Li,
M.J.Halaby,
A.Hakem,
R.Cardoso,
S.El Ghamrasni,
S.Harding,
N.Chan,
R.Bristow,
O.Sanchez,
D.Durocher,
and
R.Hakem
(2010).
Rnf8 deficiency impairs class switch recombination, spermatogenesis, and genomic integrity and predisposes for cancer.
|
| |
J Exp Med,
207,
983-997.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Y.Lu,
J.Wu,
L.Ye,
G.B.Gavrilina,
T.L.Saunders,
and
X.Yu
(2010).
RNF8-dependent histone modifications regulate nucleosome removal during spermatogenesis.
|
| |
Dev Cell,
18,
371-384.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Santos,
M.S.Huen,
M.Jankovic,
H.T.Chen,
A.J.López-Contreras,
I.A.Klein,
N.Wong,
J.L.Barbancho,
O.Fernandez-Capetillo,
M.C.Nussenzweig,
J.Chen,
and
A.Nussenzweig
(2010).
Class switching and meiotic defects in mice lacking the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF8.
|
| |
J Exp Med,
207,
973-981.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.van Vugt,
A.K.Gardino,
R.Linding,
G.J.Ostheimer,
H.C.Reinhardt,
S.E.Ong,
C.S.Tan,
H.Miao,
S.M.Keezer,
J.Li,
T.Pawson,
T.A.Lewis,
S.A.Carr,
S.J.Smerdon,
T.R.Brummelkamp,
and
M.B.Yaffe
(2010).
A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.
|
| |
PLoS Biol,
8,
e1000287.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.Moynahan,
and
M.Jasin
(2010).
Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
11,
196-207.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Granata,
F.Lazzaro,
D.Novarina,
D.Panigada,
F.Puddu,
C.M.Abreu,
R.Kumar,
M.Grenon,
N.F.Lowndes,
P.Plevani,
and
M.Muzi-Falconi
(2010).
Dynamics of Rad9 chromatin binding and checkpoint function are mediated by its dimerization and are cell cycle-regulated by CDK1 activity.
|
| |
PLoS Genet,
6,
0.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Huen,
S.M.Sy,
and
J.Chen
(2010).
BRCA1 and its toolbox for the maintenance of genome integrity.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
11,
138-148.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.M.Shanbhag,
I.U.Rafalska-Metcalf,
C.Balane-Bolivar,
S.M.Janicki,
and
R.A.Greenberg
(2010).
ATM-dependent chromatin changes silence transcription in cis to DNA double-strand breaks.
|
| |
Cell,
141,
970-981.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.J.Becherel,
B.Jakob,
A.L.Cherry,
N.Gueven,
M.Fusser,
A.W.Kijas,
C.Peng,
S.Katyal,
P.J.McKinnon,
J.Chen,
B.Epe,
S.J.Smerdon,
G.Taucher-Scholz,
and
M.F.Lavin
(2010).
CK2 phosphorylation-dependent interaction between aprataxin and MDC1 in the DNA damage response.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
1489-1503.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Zhu,
and
A.A.Wani
(2010).
Histone modifications: crucial elements for damage response and chromatin restoration.
|
| |
J Cell Physiol,
223,
283-288.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Cescutti,
S.Negrini,
M.Kohzaki,
and
T.D.Halazonetis
(2010).
TopBP1 functions with 53BP1 in the G1 DNA damage checkpoint.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
3723-3732.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Rai,
H.Zheng,
H.He,
Y.Luo,
A.Multani,
P.B.Carpenter,
and
S.Chang
(2010).
The function of classical and alternative non-homologous end-joining pathways in the fusion of dysfunctional telomeres.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
2598-2610.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Sakasai,
H.Teraoka,
and
R.S.Tibbetts
(2010).
Proteasome inhibition suppresses DNA-dependent protein kinase activation caused by camptothecin.
|
| |
DNA Repair (Amst),
9,
76-82.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Bekker-Jensen,
J.R.Danielsen,
K.Fugger,
I.Gromova,
A.Nerstedt,
J.Bartek,
J.Lukas,
and
N.Mailand
(2010).
HERC2 coordinates ubiquitin-dependent assembly of DNA repair factors on damaged chromosomes.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol,
12,
80.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Giunta,
R.Belotserkovskaya,
and
S.P.Jackson
(2010).
DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
190,
197-207.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Jungmichel,
and
M.Stucki
(2010).
MDC1: The art of keeping things in focus.
|
| |
Chromosoma,
119,
337-349.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.M.Belgnaoui,
K.A.Fryrear,
J.O.Nyalwidhe,
X.Guo,
and
O.J.Semmes
(2010).
The viral oncoprotein tax sequesters DNA damage response factors by tethering MDC1 to chromatin.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
32897-32905.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Nakada,
I.Tai,
S.Panier,
A.Al-Hakim,
S.Iemura,
Y.C.Juang,
L.O'Donnell,
A.Kumakubo,
M.Munro,
F.Sicheri,
A.C.Gingras,
T.Natsume,
T.Suda,
and
D.Durocher
(2010).
Non-canonical inhibition of DNA damage-dependent ubiquitination by OTUB1.
|
| |
Nature,
466,
941-946.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Ramachandran,
R.Chahwan,
R.M.Nepal,
D.Frieder,
S.Panier,
S.Roa,
A.Zaheen,
D.Durocher,
M.D.Scharff,
and
A.Martin
(2010).
The RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitin ligase cascade facilitates class switch recombination.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
809-814.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Tikoo,
and
S.Sengupta
(2010).
Time to bloom.
|
| |
Genome Integr,
1,
14.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Bohgaki,
M.Bohgaki,
and
R.Hakem
(2010).
DNA double-strand break signaling and human disorders.
|
| |
Genome Integr,
1,
15.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.L.Yang,
C.Y.Wu,
J.Wu,
and
H.K.Lin
(2010).
Regulation of Akt signaling activation by ubiquitination.
|
| |
Cell Cycle,
9,
487-497.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.L.Yang,
X.Zhang,
and
H.K.Lin
(2010).
Emerging role of Lys-63 ubiquitination in protein kinase and phosphatase activation and cancer development.
|
| |
Oncogene,
29,
4493-4503.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.V.Hu,
T.M.Rodrigues,
H.Tao,
R.K.Baker,
L.Miraglia,
A.P.Orth,
G.E.Lyons,
P.G.Schultz,
and
X.Wu
(2010).
Identification of RING finger protein 4 (RNF4) as a modulator of DNA demethylation through a functional genomics screen.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
15087-15092.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Sun,
X.Jiang,
and
B.D.Price
(2010).
Tip60: connecting chromatin to DNA damage signaling.
|
| |
Cell Cycle,
9,
930-936.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Xu,
Y.Sun,
X.Jiang,
M.K.Ayrapetov,
P.Moskwa,
S.Yang,
D.M.Weinstock,
and
B.D.Price
(2010).
The p400 ATPase regulates nucleosome stability and chromatin ubiquitination during DNA repair.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
191,
31-43.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.A.Goodarzi,
and
P.A.Jeggo
(2009).
'A mover and a shaker': 53BP1 allows DNA doublestrand breaks a chance to dance and unite.
|
| |
F1000 Biol Rep,
1,
0.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.A.Thambirajah,
A.Li,
T.Ishibashi,
and
J.Ausió
(2009).
New developments in post-translational modifications and functions of histone H2A variants.
|
| |
Biochem Cell Biol,
87,
7.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Hartlerode,
and
R.Scully
(2009).
Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells.
|
| |
Biochem J,
423,
157-168.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Wang,
K.Hurov,
K.Hofmann,
and
S.J.Elledge
(2009).
NBA1, a new player in the Brca1 A complex, is required for DNA damage resistance and checkpoint control.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
23,
729-739.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Doil,
N.Mailand,
S.Bekker-Jensen,
P.Menard,
D.H.Larsen,
R.Pepperkok,
J.Ellenberg,
S.Panier,
D.Durocher,
J.Bartek,
J.Lukas,
and
C.Lukas
(2009).
RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins.
|
| |
Cell,
136,
435-446.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.M.Cooper,
C.Cutcliffe,
T.Z.Kristiansen,
A.Pandey,
C.M.Pickart,
and
R.E.Cohen
(2009).
K63-specific deubiquitination by two JAMM/MPN+ complexes: BRISC-associated Brcc36 and proteasomal Poh1.
|
| |
EMBO J,
28,
621-631.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.S.Stewart,
S.Panier,
K.Townsend,
A.K.Al-Hakim,
N.K.Kolas,
E.S.Miller,
S.Nakada,
J.Ylanko,
S.Olivarius,
M.Mendez,
C.Oldreive,
J.Wildenhain,
A.Tagliaferro,
L.Pelletier,
N.Taubenheim,
A.Durandy,
P.J.Byrd,
T.Stankovic,
A.M.Taylor,
and
D.Durocher
(2009).
The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage.
|
| |
Cell,
136,
420-434.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Shao,
D.R.Lilli,
J.Patterson-Fortin,
K.A.Coleman,
D.E.Morrissey,
and
R.A.Greenberg
(2009).
The Rap80-BRCC36 de-ubiquitinating enzyme complex antagonizes RNF8-Ubc13-dependent ubiquitination events at DNA double strand breaks.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
3166-3171.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Shao,
J.Patterson-Fortin,
T.E.Messick,
D.Feng,
N.Shanbhag,
Y.Wang,
and
R.A.Greenberg
(2009).
MERIT40 controls BRCA1-Rap80 complex integrity and recruitment to DNA double-strand breaks.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
23,
740-754.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.C.Reinhardt,
and
M.B.Yaffe
(2009).
Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
21,
245-255.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.van Attikum,
and
S.M.Gasser
(2009).
Crosstalk between histone modifications during the DNA damage response.
|
| |
Trends Cell Biol,
19,
207-217.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.M.Muñoz,
and
J.Rouse
(2009).
Control of histone methylation and genome stability by PTIP.
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
10,
239-245.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Marteijn,
S.Bekker-Jensen,
N.Mailand,
H.Lans,
P.Schwertman,
A.M.Gourdin,
N.P.Dantuma,
J.Lukas,
and
W.Vermeulen
(2009).
Nucleotide excision repair-induced H2A ubiquitination is dependent on MDC1 and RNF8 and reveals a universal DNA damage response.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
186,
835-847.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Huang,
M.S.Huen,
H.Kim,
C.C.Leung,
J.N.Glover,
X.Yu,
and
J.Chen
(2009).
RAD18 transmits DNA damage signalling to elicit homologous recombination repair.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol,
11,
592-603.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Huang,
Z.Gong,
G.Ghosal,
and
J.Chen
(2009).
SOSS complexes participate in the maintenance of genomic stability.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
35,
384-393.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.J.Sims,
and
R.E.Cohen
(2009).
Linkage-specific avidity defines the lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin-binding preference of rap80.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
33,
775-783.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Nikkilä,
K.A.Coleman,
D.Morrissey,
K.Pylkäs,
H.Erkko,
T.E.Messick,
S.M.Karppinen,
A.Amelina,
R.Winqvist,
and
R.A.Greenberg
(2009).
Familial breast cancer screening reveals an alteration in the RAP80 UIM domain that impairs DNA damage response function.
|
| |
Oncogene,
28,
1843-1852.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.Morris,
C.Boutell,
M.Keppler,
R.Densham,
D.Weekes,
A.Alamshah,
L.Butler,
Y.Galanty,
L.Pangon,
T.Kiuchi,
T.Ng,
and
E.Solomon
(2009).
The SUMO modification pathway is involved in the BRCA1 response to genotoxic stress.
|
| |
Nature,
462,
886-890.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.V.Tjeertes,
K.M.Miller,
and
S.P.Jackson
(2009).
Screen for DNA-damage-responsive histone modifications identifies H3K9Ac and H3K56Ac in human cells.
|
| |
EMBO J,
28,
1878-1889.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Wu,
M.J.Prindle,
G.R.Dressler,
and
X.Yu
(2009).
PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
18078-18084.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Wu,
M.S.Huen,
L.Y.Lu,
L.Ye,
Y.Dou,
M.Ljungman,
J.Chen,
and
X.Yu
(2009).
Histone ubiquitination associates with BRCA1-dependent DNA damage response.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
29,
849-860.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Yan,
D.Menendez,
X.P.Yang,
M.A.Resnick,
and
A.M.Jetten
(2009).
A Regulatory Loop Composed of RAP80-HDM2-p53 Provides RAP80-enhanced p53 Degradation by HDM2 in Response to DNA Damage.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
19280-19289.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Yuan,
G.Ghosal,
and
J.Chen
(2009).
The annealing helicase HARP protects stalled replication forks.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
23,
2394-2399.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Hiom
(2009).
DNA repair: a riddle at a double-strand break.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
19,
R331-R333.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Watanabe,
K.Iwabuchi,
J.Sun,
Y.Tsuji,
T.Tani,
K.Tokunaga,
T.Date,
M.Hashimoto,
M.Yamaizumi,
and
S.Tateishi
(2009).
RAD18 promotes DNA double-strand break repair during G1 phase through chromatin retention of 53BP1.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
37,
2176-2193.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Yano,
K.Morotomi-Yano,
N.Adachi,
and
H.Akiyama
(2009).
Molecular mechanism of protein assembly on DNA double-strand breaks in the non-homologous end-joining pathway.
|
| |
J Radiat Res (Tokyo),
50,
97.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Feng,
J.Huang,
and
J.Chen
(2009).
MERIT40 facilitates BRCA1 localization and DNA damage repair.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
23,
719-728.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.L.Coleman,
and
P.J.Ratcliffe
(2009).
Angiogenesis: escape from hypoxia.
|
| |
Nat Med,
15,
491-493.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Lisby,
and
R.Rothstein
(2009).
Choreography of recombination proteins during the DNA damage response.
|
| |
DNA Repair (Amst),
8,
1068-1076.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Sinha,
and
C.L.Peterson
(2009).
Chromatin dynamics during repair of chromosomal DNA double-strand breaks.
|
| |
Epigenomics,
1,
371-385.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Zhang,
R.Kaur,
S.Akhter,
and
R.J.Legerski
(2009).
Cdc5L interacts with ATR and is required for the S-phase cell-cycle checkpoint.
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
10,
1029-1035.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Zgheib,
K.Pataky,
J.Brugger,
and
T.D.Halazonetis
(2009).
An oligomerized 53BP1 tudor domain suffices for recognition of DNA double-strand breaks.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
29,
1050-1058.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Barthe,
C.Roumestand,
M.J.Canova,
L.Kremer,
C.Hurard,
V.Molle,
and
M.Cohen-Gonsaud
(2009).
Dynamic and structural characterization of a bacterial FHA protein reveals a new autoinhibition mechanism.
|
| |
Structure,
17,
568-578.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Jeggo,
and
M.F.Lavin
(2009).
Cellular radiosensitivity: how much better do we understand it?
|
| |
Int J Radiat Biol,
85,
1061-1081.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Yan,
S.Dutt,
R.Xu,
K.Graves,
P.Juszczynski,
J.P.Manis,
and
M.A.Shipp
(2009).
BBAP monoubiquitylates histone H4 at lysine 91 and selectively modulates the DNA damage response.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
36,
110-120.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Zhu,
G.Wani,
H.H.Arab,
M.A.El-Mahdy,
A.Ray,
and
A.A.Wani
(2009).
Chromatin restoration following nucleotide excision repair involves the incorporation of ubiquitinated H2A at damaged genomic sites.
|
| |
DNA Repair (Amst),
8,
262-273.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.A.Chanoux,
B.Yin,
K.A.Urtishak,
A.Asare,
C.H.Bassing,
and
E.J.Brown
(2009).
ATR and H2AX Cooperate in Maintaining Genome Stability under Replication Stress.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
5994-6003.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Danesi,
G.Pasqualetti,
E.Giovannetti,
F.Crea,
G.Altavilla,
M.Del Tacca,
and
R.Rosell
(2009).
Pharmacogenomics in non-small-cell lung cancer chemotherapy.
|
| |
Adv Drug Deliv Rev,
61,
408-417.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Bergink,
and
S.Jentsch
(2009).
Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair.
|
| |
Nature,
458,
461-467.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Pinato,
C.Scandiuzzi,
N.Arnaudo,
E.Citterio,
G.Gaudino,
and
L.Penengo
(2009).
RNF168, a new RING finger, MIU-containing protein that modifies chromatin by ubiquitination of histones H2A and H2AX.
|
| |
BMC Mol Biol,
10,
55.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.So,
A.J.Davis,
and
D.J.Chen
(2009).
Autophosphorylation at serine 1981 stabilizes ATM at DNA damage sites.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
187,
977-990.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.E.Messick,
and
R.A.Greenberg
(2009).
The ubiquitin landscape at DNA double-strand breaks.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
187,
319-326.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.K.Pandita,
and
C.Richardson
(2009).
Chromatin remodeling finds its place in the DNA double-strand break response.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
37,
1363-1377.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Misteli,
and
E.Soutoglou
(2009).
The emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
10,
243-254.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Takeshita,
W.Wu,
A.Koike,
M.Fukuda,
and
T.Ohta
(2009).
Perturbation of DNA repair pathways by proteasome inhibitors corresponds to enhanced chemosensitivity of cells to DNA damage-inducing agents.
|
| |
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol,
64,
1039-1046.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Tsukuda,
K.M.Trujillo,
E.Martini,
and
M.A.Osley
(2009).
Analysis of chromatin remodeling during formation of a DNA double-strand break at the yeast mating type locus.
|
| |
Methods,
48,
40-45.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Savic,
B.Yin,
N.L.Maas,
A.L.Bredemeyer,
A.C.Carpenter,
B.A.Helmink,
K.S.Yang-Iott,
B.P.Sleckman,
and
C.H.Bassing
(2009).
Formation of dynamic gamma-H2AX domains along broken DNA strands is distinctly regulated by ATM and MDC1 and dependent upon H2AX densities in chromatin.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
34,
298-310.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Zhou,
X.Wang,
and
M.G.Rosenfeld
(2009).
Histone H2A ubiquitination in transcriptional regulation and DNA damage repair.
|
| |
Int J Biochem Cell Biol,
41,
12-15.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Galanty,
R.Belotserkovskaya,
J.Coates,
S.Polo,
K.M.Miller,
and
S.P.Jackson
(2009).
Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks.
|
| |
Nature,
462,
935-939.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Bencokova,
M.R.Kaufmann,
I.M.Pires,
P.S.Lecane,
A.J.Giaccia,
and
E.M.Hammond
(2009).
ATM activation and signaling under hypoxic conditions.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
29,
526-537.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Gong,
Y.W.Cho,
J.E.Kim,
K.Ge,
and
J.Chen
(2009).
Accumulation of Pax2 Transactivation Domain Interaction Protein (PTIP) at Sites of DNA Breaks via RNF8-dependent Pathway Is Required for Cell Survival after DNA Damage.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
7284-7293.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Kinner,
W.Wu,
C.Staudt,
and
G.Iliakis
(2008).
Gamma-H2AX in recognition and signaling of DNA double-strand breaks in the context of chromatin.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
36,
5678-5694.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Yin,
and
C.H.Bassing
(2008).
The sticky business of histone H2AX in V(D)J recombination, maintenance of genomic stability, and suppression of lymphoma.
|
| |
Immunol Res,
42,
29-40.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.C.Lin,
Y.S.Huoh,
K.R.Schmitz,
L.E.Jensen,
and
K.M.Ferguson
(2008).
Pellino proteins contain a cryptic FHA domain that mediates interaction with phosphorylated IRAK1.
|
| |
Structure,
16,
1806-1816.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Dinant,
A.B.Houtsmuller,
and
W.Vermeulen
(2008).
Chromatin structure and DNA damage repair.
|
| |
Epigenetics Chromatin,
1,
9.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Lovly,
L.Yan,
C.E.Ryan,
S.Takada,
and
H.Piwnica-Worms
(2008).
Regulation of Chk2 ubiquitination and signaling through autophosphorylation of serine 379.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
28,
5874-5885.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Branzei,
and
M.Foiani
(2008).
Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
9,
297-308.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Bennett,
and
J.W.Harper
(2008).
DNA damage: ubiquitin marks the spot.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
15,
20-22.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.H.Vissers,
F.Nicassio,
M.van Lohuizen,
P.P.Di Fiore,
and
E.Citterio
(2008).
The many faces of ubiquitinated histone H2A: insights from the DUBs.
|
| |
Cell Div,
3,
8.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Lukas,
and
J.Bartek
(2008).
DNA damage: a histone-code mediator leaves the stage.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
15,
430-432.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Gagné,
M.Isabelle,
K.S.Lo,
S.Bourassa,
M.J.Hendzel,
V.L.Dawson,
T.M.Dawson,
and
G.G.Poirier
(2008).
Proteome-wide identification of poly(ADP-ribose) binding proteins and poly(ADP-ribose)-associated protein complexes.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
36,
6959-6976.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.Chapman,
and
S.P.Jackson
(2008).
Phospho-dependent interactions between NBS1 and MDC1 mediate chromatin retention of the MRN complex at sites of DNA damage.
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
9,
795-801.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Yan,
and
A.M.Jetten
(2008).
RAP80 and RNF8, key players in the recruitment of repair proteins to DNA damage sites.
|
| |
Cancer Lett,
271,
179-190.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.A.Wilson,
and
D.F.Stern
(2008).
NFBD1/MDC1, 53BP1 and BRCA1 have both redundant and unique roles in the ATM pathway.
|
| |
Cell Cycle,
7,
3584-3594.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Iijima,
M.Ohara,
R.Seki,
and
H.Tauchi
(2008).
Dancing on damaged chromatin: functions of ATM and the RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 complex in cellular responses to DNA damage.
|
| |
J Radiat Res (Tokyo),
49,
451-464.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Minter-Dykhouse,
I.Ward,
M.S.Huen,
J.Chen,
and
Z.Lou
(2008).
Distinct versus overlapping functions of MDC1 and 53BP1 in DNA damage response and tumorigenesis.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
181,
727-735.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Brooks,
E.G.Heimsath,
G.L.Loring,
and
C.Brenner
(2008).
FHA-RING ubiquitin ligases in cell division cycle control.
|
| |
Cell Mol Life Sci,
65,
3458-3466.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.M.Privette,
and
E.M.Petty
(2008).
CHFR: A Novel Mitotic Checkpoint Protein and Regulator of Tumorigenesis.
|
| |
Transl Oncol,
1,
57-64.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Postow,
C.Ghenoiu,
E.M.Woo,
A.N.Krutchinsky,
B.T.Chait,
and
H.Funabiki
(2008).
Ku80 removal from DNA through double strand break-induced ubiquitylation.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
182,
467-479.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Wu,
K.Luo,
Z.Lou,
and
J.Chen
(2008).
MDC1 regulates intra-S-phase checkpoint by targeting NBS1 to DNA double-strand breaks.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
11200-11205.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Cohn,
and
A.D.D'Andrea
(2008).
Chromatin recruitment of DNA repair proteins: lessons from the fanconi anemia and double-strand break repair pathways.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
32,
306-312.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.F.Lavin
(2008).
Ataxia-telangiectasia: from a rare disorder to a paradigm for cell signalling and cancer.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
9,
759-769.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Huen,
and
J.Chen
(2008).
The DNA damage response pathways: at the crossroad of protein modifications.
|
| |
Cell Res,
18,
8.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Huen,
J.Huang,
J.Yuan,
M.Yamamoto,
S.Akira,
C.Ashley,
W.Xiao,
and
J.Chen
(2008).
Noncanonical E2 variant-independent function of UBC13 in promoting checkpoint protein assembly.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
28,
6104-6112.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Huen,
S.M.Sy,
J.M.van Deursen,
and
J.Chen
(2008).
Direct interaction between SET8 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen couples H4-K20 methylation with DNA replication.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
11073-11077.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Yeung,
and
D.Durocher
(2008).
Engineering a DNA damage response without DNA damage.
|
| |
Genome Biol,
9,
227.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Puebla-Osorio,
and
C.Zhu
(2008).
DNA damage and repair during lymphoid development: antigen receptor diversity, genomic integrity and lymphomagenesis.
|
| |
Immunol Res,
41,
103-122.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.A.Greenberg
(2008).
Recognition of DNA double strand breaks by the BRCA1 tumor suppressor network.
|
| |
Chromosoma,
117,
305-317.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Sakasai,
and
R.Tibbetts
(2008).
RNF8-dependent and RNF8-independent regulation of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
13549-13555.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Feuerhahn,
and
J.M.Egly
(2008).
Tools to study DNA repair: what's in the box?
|
| |
Trends Genet,
24,
467-474.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Sivasubramaniam,
X.Sun,
Y.R.Pan,
S.Wang,
and
E.Y.Lee
(2008).
Cep164 is a mediator protein required for the maintenance of genomic stability through modulation of MDC1, RPA, and CHK1.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
22,
587-600.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.C.Chou,
H.C.Wang,
F.H.Wong,
S.L.Ding,
P.E.Wu,
S.Y.Shieh,
and
C.Y.Shen
(2008).
Chk2-dependent phosphorylation of XRCC1 in the DNA damage response promotes base excision repair.
|
| |
EMBO J,
27,
3140-3150.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Shi,
Z.Ma,
H.Willers,
K.Akhtar,
S.P.Scott,
J.Zhang,
S.Powell,
and
J.Zhang
(2008).
Disassembly of MDC1 Foci Is Controlled by Ubiquitin-Proteasome-dependent Degradation.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
31608-31616.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Wu,
A.Koike,
T.Takeshita,
and
T.Ohta
(2008).
The ubiquitin E3 ligase activity of BRCA1 and its biological functions.
|
| |
Cell Div,
3,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Dai,
S.Chen,
X.Y.Pei,
J.A.Almenara,
L.B.Kramer,
C.A.Venditti,
P.Dent,
and
S.Grant
(2008).
Interruption of the Ras/MEK/ERK signaling cascade enhances Chk1 inhibitor-induced DNA damage in vitro and in vivo in human multiple myeloma cells.
|
| |
Blood,
112,
2439-2449.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Liu,
J.A.Parry,
A.Chin,
S.Duensing,
and
A.Duensing
(2008).
Soluble histone H2AX is induced by DNA replication stress and sensitizes cells to undergo apoptosis.
|
| |
Mol Cancer,
7,
61.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Xie,
A.Hartlerode,
M.Stucki,
S.Odate,
N.Puget,
A.Kwok,
G.Nagaraju,
C.Yan,
F.W.Alt,
J.Chen,
S.P.Jackson,
and
R.Scully
(2007).
Distinct roles of chromatin-associated proteins MDC1 and 53BP1 in mammalian double-strand break repair.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
28,
1045-1057.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.W.Harper,
and
S.J.Elledge
(2007).
The DNA damage response: ten years after.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
28,
739-745.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Mailand,
S.Bekker-Jensen,
H.Faustrup,
F.Melander,
J.Bartek,
C.Lukas,
and
J.Lukas
(2007).
RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins.
|
| |
Cell,
131,
887-900.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Hunter
(2007).
The age of crosstalk: phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and beyond.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
28,
730-738.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.H.Yang,
and
L.Zou
(2007).
Launching a ubiquitination cascade at DNA breaks.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
20645-20646.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |