 |
PDBsum entry 2d0k
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxidoreductase
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2d0k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.1.5.1.3
- dihydrofolate reductase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

Pathway:
|
 |
Folate Coenzymes
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
(6S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate + NADP+ = 7,8-dihydrofolate + NADPH + H+
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
(6S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate
|
+
|
NADP(+)
|
=
|
7,8-dihydrofolate
Bound ligand (Het Group name = )
corresponds exactly
|
+
|
NADPH
|
+
|
H(+)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
281:13234-13246
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Evolutional design of a hyperactive cysteine- and methionine-free mutant of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase.
|
|
M.Iwakura,
K.Maki,
H.Takahashi,
T.Takenawa,
A.Yokota,
K.Katayanagi,
T.Kamiyama,
K.Gekko.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
We developed a strategy for finding out the adapted variants of enzymes, and we
applied it to an enzyme, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), in terms of its
catalytic activity so that we successfully obtained several hyperactive
cysteine- and methionine-free variants of DHFR in which all five methionyl and
two cysteinyl residues were replaced by other amino acid residues. Among them, a
variant (M1A/M16N/M20L/M42Y/C85A/M92F/C152S), named as ANLYF, has an
approximately seven times higher k(cat) value than wild type DHFR. Enzyme
kinetics and crystal structures of the variant were investigated for elucidating
the mechanism of the hyperactivity. Steady-state and transient binding kinetics
of the variant indicated that the kinetic scheme of the catalytic cycle of ANLYF
was essentially the same as that of wild type, showing that the hyperactivity
was brought about by an increase of the dissociation rate constants of
tetrahydrofolate from the enzyme-NADPH-tetrahydrofolate ternary complex. The
crystal structure of the variant, solved and refined to an R factor of 0.205 at
1.9-angstroms resolution, indicated that an increased structural flexibility of
the variant and an increased size of the N-(p-aminobenzoyl)-L-glutamate binding
cleft induced the increase of the dissociation constant. This was consistent
with a large compressibility (volume fluctuation) of the variant. A comparison
of folding kinetics between wild type and the variant showed that the folding of
these two enzymes was similar to each other, suggesting that the activity
enhancement of the enzyme can be attained without drastic changes of the folding
mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
FIGURE 4. Displacement of the crystal structure between the
wild type (Protein Data Bank code 1DYI; cyan) and ANLYF
(magenta). The r.m.s.d. calculated by using the backbone atoms
of the adenosine binding subdomain, the loop subdomain, and
folate of the two crystal structures was minimized in A-C,
respectively. The regions used for calculating r.m.s.d. are
colored explicitly in gray. D and E show representative residues
located in the vicinity of the axis of the hinge motion, in
which Met-42 (Tyr-42) (green) and Met-92 (Phe-92) (orange) are
also included for the wild type and ANLYF, respectively. Folates
colored blue and red are bound with the wild type and ANLYF,
respectively. All the panels were drawn using a program MOLMOL
(66).
|
 |
Figure 10.
FIGURE 10. Plot of logarithms of the relative activity
(k[cat] of mutant protein/k[cat] of the wild type) of ANLYF
(•) and the mutant proteins created at sites 67, 121, and 145
( )
of DHFR against their adiabatic compressibilities, 1
. Data for the mutants except ANLYF were taken from Ref. 34.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2006,
281,
13234-13246)
copyright 2006.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Schuyler,
H.A.Carlson,
and
E.L.Feldman
(2009).
Computational methods for predicting sites of functionally important dynamics.
|
| |
J Phys Chem B,
113,
6613-6622.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Takenawa,
A.Yokota,
M.Oda,
H.Takahashi,
and
M.Iwakura
(2009).
Protein oxidation during long storage: identification of the oxidation sites in dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli through LC-MS and fragment studies.
|
| |
J Biochem,
145,
517-523.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Xie,
I.Pashkov,
X.Gao,
J.L.Guerrero,
T.O.Yeates,
and
Y.Tang
(2009).
Rational improvement of simvastatin synthase solubility in Escherichia coli leads to higher whole-cell biocatalytic activity.
|
| |
Biotechnol Bioeng,
102,
20-28.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Niiranen,
B.Altermark,
B.O.Brandsdal,
H.K.Leiros,
R.Helland,
A.O.Smalås,
and
N.P.Willassen
(2008).
Effects of salt on the kinetics and thermodynamic stability of endonuclease I from Vibrio salmonicida and Vibrio cholerae.
|
| |
FEBS J,
275,
1593-1605.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |