 |
PDBsum entry 2c56
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
281:4983-4992
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
A comparative study of uracil-DNA glycosylases from human and herpes simplex virus type 1.
|
|
K.Krusong,
E.P.Carpenter,
S.R.Bellamy,
R.Savva,
G.S.Baldwin.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) is the key enzyme responsible for initiation of
base excision repair. We have used both kinetic and binding assays for
comparative analysis of UNG enzymes from humans and herpes simplex virus type 1
(HSV-1). Steady-state fluorescence assays showed that hUNG has a much higher
specificity constant (k(cat)/K(m)) compared with the viral enzyme due to a lower
K(m). The binding of UNG to DNA was also studied using a catalytically inactive
mutant of UNG and non-cleavable substrate analogs (2'-deoxypseudouridine and
2'-alpha-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine). Equilibrium DNA binding revealed that both
human and HSV-1 UNG enzymes bind to abasic DNA and both substrate analogs more
weakly than to uracil-containing DNA. Structure determination of HSV-1
D88N/H210N UNG in complex with uracil revealed detailed information on substrate
binding. Together, these results suggest that a significant proportion of the
binding energy is provided by specific interactions with the target uracil. The
kinetic parameters for human UNG indicate that it is likely to have activity
against both U.A and U.G mismatches in vivo. Weak binding to abasic DNA also
suggests that UNG activity is unlikely to be coupled to the subsequent common
steps of base excision repair.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
FIGURE 5. Binding of the human wild-type and D145N/H268N
UNG enzymes to non-cleavable substrate analogs d rd and
-FdUrd. The binding of
hexachlorofluorescein-labeled oligonucleotides containing the
non-cleavable substrate analogs d rd and -FdUrd
was monitored using fluorescence polarization. A, the binding of
wild-type hUNG was measured with d rd (•) and -FdUrd (
).
Data are shown with the best fit to the binding equation with
the following values: d rd, K[d] = 4.4 ±
0.5 µM, A[D] = 0.041 ± 0.002, and A[D][E] = 0.17
± 0.003; and -FdUrd, K[d] = 6.3
± 0.6 µM, A[D] = 0.039 ± 0.002, and A[D][E]
= 0.13 ± 0.002. B, the binding of human D145N/H268N UNG
was measured with d rd (•) and -FdUrd (
).
Data are shown with the best fit to the binding equation with
the following values: d rd, K[d] = 3.2 ±
0.2 µM, A[D] = 0.038 ± 0.001, and A[D][E] = 0.14
± 0.001; and -FdUrd, K[d] = 2.2
± 0.2 µM, A[D] = 0.041 ± 0.003, and A[D][E]
= 0.17 ± 0.002.
|
 |
Figure 6.
FIGURE 6. Active site of HSV-1 D88N/H210N UNG. A, the amino
acid residues in the active site of HSV-1 D88N/H210N UNG (green,
carbons; blue, nitrogen; red, oxygens) are aligned with those of
the wild-type enzyme (purple). Electron density for HSV-1
D88N/H210N UNG is shown. B, HSV-1 D88N/H210N UNG with uridine
bound in the active site is aligned with the wild-type enzyme
with uracil bound in the active site (purple). Electron density
for HSV-1 D88N/H210N UNG is shown. C, hydrogen bond distances
between the residues in the HSV-1 D88N/H210N UNG active site and
the bound uracil are shown in red, whereas those in the active
site of the wild-type enzyme are shown in black.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2006,
281,
4983-4992)
copyright 2006.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
D.Hu,
Z.Huang,
F.Pu,
J.Ren,
and
X.Qu
(2011).
A label-free, quadruplex-based functional molecular beacon (LFG4-MB) for fluorescence turn-on detection of DNA and nuclease.
|
| |
Chemistry,
17,
1635-1641.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Grippon,
Q.Zhao,
T.Robinson,
J.J.Marshall,
R.J.O'Neill,
H.Manning,
G.Kennedy,
C.Dunsby,
M.Neil,
S.E.Halford,
P.M.French,
and
G.S.Baldwin
(2011).
Differential modes of DNA binding by mismatch uracil DNA glycosylase from Escherichia coli: implications for abasic lesion processing and enzyme communication in the base excision repair pathway.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
39,
2593-2603.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.O.Zharkov,
G.V.Mechetin,
and
G.A.Nevinsky
(2010).
Uracil-DNA glycosylase: Structural, thermodynamic and kinetic aspects of lesion search and recognition.
|
| |
Mutat Res,
685,
11-20.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Bharti,
and
U.Varshney
(2010).
Analysis of the impact of a uracil DNA glycosylase attenuated in AP-DNA binding in maintenance of the genomic integrity in Escherichia coli.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
2291-2301.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Huang,
J.T.Stivers,
and
M.M.Greenberg
(2009).
Competitive inhibition of uracil DNA glycosylase by a modified nucleotide whose triphosphate is a substrate for DNA polymerase.
|
| |
J Am Chem Soc,
131,
1344-1345.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.M.Di Noia,
G.T.Williams,
D.T.Chan,
J.M.Buerstedde,
G.S.Baldwin,
and
M.S.Neuberger
(2007).
Dependence of antibody gene diversification on uracil excision.
|
| |
J Exp Med,
204,
3209-3219.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.R.Bellamy,
K.Krusong,
and
G.S.Baldwin
(2007).
A rapid reaction analysis of uracil DNA glycosylase indicates an active mechanism of base flipping.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
35,
1478-1487.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |