 |
PDBsum entry 2zkf
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Ligase
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of the sra domain of mouse np95 in complex with hemi-methylated cpg DNA
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase uhrf1. Chain: a. Fragment: unp residues 404-613. Synonym: ubiquitin-like phd and ring finger domain-containing protein 1, ubiquitin-like-containing phd and ring finger domains protein 1, nuclear zinc finger protein np95, nuclear protein 95. Engineered: yes. DNA (5'-d(p Dcp Dap Dcp Dcp Dgp Dgp Dap Dtp Dap Dgp Da)- 3').
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Mus musculus. Mouse. Organism_taxid: 10090. Gene: uhrf1, np95. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: nucleotide synthesis. Other_details: nucleotide synthesis
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.55Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.217
|
R-free:
|
0.275
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
K.Arita,M.Ariyoshi,H.Tochio,Y.Nakamura,M.Shirakawa
|
Key ref:
|
 |
K.Arita
et al.
(2008).
Recognition of hemi-methylated DNA by the SRA protein UHRF1 by a base-flipping mechanism.
Nature,
455,
818-821.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
19-Mar-08
|
Release date:
|
09-Sep-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q8VDF2
(UHRF1_MOUSE) -
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UHRF1 from Mus musculus
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
782 a.a.
209 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C-A-C-C-G-G-A-T-A-G-A
11 bases
|
|
|
|
C-T-A-T-C-5CM-G-G-T-G-A
11 bases
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.2.3.2.27
- RING-type E3 ubiquitin transferase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
S-ubiquitinyl-[E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme]-L-cysteine + [acceptor protein]-L-lysine = [E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme]-L-cysteine + N6- ubiquitinyl-[acceptor protein]-L-lysine
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nature
455:818-821
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Recognition of hemi-methylated DNA by the SRA protein UHRF1 by a base-flipping mechanism.
|
|
K.Arita,
M.Ariyoshi,
H.Tochio,
Y.Nakamura,
M.Shirakawa.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
DNA methylation of CpG dinucleotides is an important epigenetic modification of
mammalian genomes and is essential for the regulation of chromatin structure, of
gene expression and of genome stability. Differences in DNA methylation patterns
underlie a wide range of biological processes, such as genomic imprinting,
inactivation of the X chromosome, embryogenesis, and carcinogenesis. Inheritance
of the epigenetic methylation pattern is mediated by the enzyme DNA
methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1), which methylates newly synthesized CpG sequences
during DNA replication, depending on the methylation status of the template
strands. The protein UHRF1 (also known as Np95 and ICBP90) recognizes
hemi-methylation sites via a SET and RING-associated (SRA) domain and directs
Dnmt1 to these sites. Here we report the crystal structures of the SRA domain in
free and hemi-methylated DNA-bound states. The SRA domain folds into a globular
structure with a basic concave surface formed by highly conserved residues.
Binding of DNA to the concave surface causes a loop and an amino-terminal tail
of the SRA domain to fold into DNA interfaces at the major and minor grooves of
the methylation site. In contrast to fully methylated CpG sites recognized by
the methyl-CpG-binding domain, the methylcytosine base at the hemi-methylated
site is flipped out of the DNA helix in the SRA-DNA complex and fits tightly
into a protein pocket on the concave surface. The complex structure suggests
that the successive flip out of the pre-existing methylated cytosine and the
target cytosine to be methylated is associated with the coordinated transfer of
the hemi-methylated CpG site from UHRF1 to Dnmt1.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2: Overall structure of the SRA–hemi-methylated CpG DNA
complex. a, Ribbon representation of the SRA–DNA complex in
the same orientations as in Fig. 1a: grey, SRA; orange, N-tail
and finger loop; light blue, loop L3; light green, DNA; magenta,
flipped-out base 5mC[7]. b, Schematic representation of the
protein–DNA interactions observed in the crystal structure.
Hydrogen bonds between SRA and DNA are shown by red lines:
dotted, main-chain contacts; solid, side-chain contacts. Van der
Waals contacts between SRA and DNA are shown by blue lines. W,
water molecules mediating indirect interactions.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3: Specific recognition of a hemi-methylated CpG site by
SRA. The colour codes for the protein and DNA are same as in
Fig. 2a. Red dotted lines show hydrogen-bond contacts within 4
Å. a, Close-up view of the flipped-out 5mC[7] recognition
site. The composite-omit electron density map for 5mC[7] (more
than 6.0 )
is shown in blue. b, The orphaned guanidine G[7]' base is
retained near a canonical position in the DNA duplex by
interactions with the SRA residues. c, Interactions between the
G8 C8'
base pair adjacent to the flipped-out base and the SRA residues.
Wat, water. d, The model of fully methylated DNA bound to the
SRA. The methyl group of 5mC[8]' (shown as a green sphere)
causes steric interference with Asn 494 (orange spheres) in the
finger loop. The hydrogen-bond distances between these bases and
the SRA residues are listed in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature
(2008,
455,
818-821)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
S.B.Rothbart,
K.Krajewski,
N.Nady,
W.Tempel,
S.Xue,
A.I.Badeaux,
D.Barsyte-Lovejoy,
J.Y.Martinez,
M.T.Bedford,
S.M.Fuchs,
C.H.Arrowsmith,
and
B.D.Strahl
(2012).
Association of UHRF1 with methylated H3K9 directs the maintenance of DNA methylation.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
19,
1155-1160.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Daskalos,
U.Oleksiewicz,
A.Filia,
G.Nikolaidis,
G.Xinarianos,
J.R.Gosney,
A.Malliri,
J.K.Field,
and
T.Liloglou
(2011).
UHRF1-mediated tumor suppressor gene inactivation in nonsmall cell lung cancer.
|
| |
Cancer,
117,
1027-1037.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Tien,
S.Senbanerjee,
A.Kulkarni,
R.Mudbhary,
B.Goudreau,
S.Ganesan,
K.C.Sadler,
and
C.Ukomadu
(2011).
UHRF1 depletion causes a G2/M arrest, activation of DNA damage response and apoptosis.
|
| |
Biochem J,
435,
175-185.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Xu,
C.Bian,
R.Lam,
A.Dong,
and
J.Min
(2011).
The structural basis for selective binding of non-methylated CpG islands by the CFP1 CXXC domain.
|
| |
Nat Commun,
2,
227.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.I.Ponferrada-Marín,
J.T.Parrilla-Doblas,
T.Roldán-Arjona,
and
R.R.Ariza
(2011).
A discontinuous DNA glycosylase domain in a family of enzymes that excise 5-methylcytosine.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
39,
1473-1484.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Liu,
and
Z.Gong
(2011).
The coupling of epigenome replication with DNA replication.
|
| |
Curr Opin Plant Biol,
14,
187-194.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Z.Jurkowska,
T.P.Jurkowski,
and
A.Jeltsch
(2011).
Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
12,
206-222.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.J.He,
T.Chen,
and
J.K.Zhu
(2011).
Regulation and function of DNA methylation in plants and animals.
|
| |
Cell Res,
21,
442-465.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Rottach,
C.Frauer,
G.Pichler,
I.M.Bonapace,
F.Spada,
and
H.Leonhardt
(2010).
The multi-domain protein Np95 connects DNA methylation and histone modification.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
1796-1804.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.V.Maltseva,
and
E.S.Gromova
(2010).
Interaction of murine dnmt3a with DNA containing o6-methylguanine.
|
| |
Biochemistry (Mosc),
75,
173-181.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.A.Mulligan,
E.Hatchwell,
S.R.McCorkle,
and
J.J.Dunn
(2010).
Differential binding of Escherichia coli McrA protein to DNA sequences that contain the dinucleotide m5CpG.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
1997-2005.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Hervouet,
L.Lalier,
E.Debien,
M.Cheray,
A.Geairon,
H.Rogniaux,
D.Loussouarn,
S.A.Martin,
F.M.Vallette,
and
P.F.Cartron
(2010).
Disruption of Dnmt1/PCNA/UHRF1 interactions promotes tumorigenesis from human and mice glial cells.
|
| |
PLoS One,
5,
e11333.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Xu,
C.Mao,
Y.Ding,
C.Rui,
L.Wu,
A.Shi,
H.Zhang,
L.Zhang,
and
Z.Xu
(2010).
Molecular and enzymatic profiles of mammalian DNA methyltransferases: structures and targets for drugs.
|
| |
Curr Med Chem,
17,
4052-4071.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Lenglet,
and
M.H.David-Cordonnier
(2010).
DNA-Destabilizing Agents as an Alternative Approach for Targeting DNA: Mechanisms of Action and Cellular Consequences.
|
| |
J Nucleic Acids,
2010,
0.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Furuhashi,
and
W.G.Kelly
(2010).
The epigenetics of germ-line immortality: lessons from an elegant model system.
|
| |
Dev Growth Differ,
52,
527-532.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Hashimoto,
P.M.Vertino,
and
X.Cheng
(2010).
Molecular coupling of DNA methylation and histone methylation.
|
| |
Epigenomics,
2,
657-669.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Mistry,
L.Tamblyn,
H.Butt,
D.Sisgoreo,
A.Gracias,
M.Larin,
K.Gopalakrishnan,
M.P.Hande,
and
J.P.McPherson
(2010).
UHRF1 is a genome caretaker that facilitates the DNA damage response to gamma-irradiation.
|
| |
Genome Integr,
1,
7.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Law,
and
S.E.Jacobsen
(2010).
Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals.
|
| |
Nat Rev Genet,
11,
204-220.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.L.Yap,
and
M.M.Zhou
(2010).
Keeping it in the family: diverse histone recognition by conserved structural folds.
|
| |
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol,
45,
488-505.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.D'Aiuto,
M.Marzulli,
K.N.Mohan,
E.Borowczyk,
F.Saporiti,
A.Vandemark,
and
J.R.Chaillet
(2010).
Dissection of structure and function of the N-terminal domain of mouse DNMT1 using regional frame-shift mutagenesis.
|
| |
PLoS One,
5,
e9831.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Unoki,
Y.Daigo,
J.Koinuma,
E.Tsuchiya,
R.Hamamoto,
and
Y.Nakamura
(2010).
UHRF1 is a novel diagnostic marker of lung cancer.
|
| |
Br J Cancer,
103,
217-222.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Cheng,
and
R.M.Blumenthal
(2010).
Coordinated chromatin control: structural and functional linkage of DNA and histone methylation.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
49,
2999-3008.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Yang,
F.Lay,
H.Han,
and
P.A.Jones
(2010).
Targeting DNA methylation for epigenetic therapy.
|
| |
Trends Pharmacol Sci,
31,
536-546.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Rottach,
H.Leonhardt,
and
F.Spada
(2009).
DNA methylation-mediated epigenetic control.
|
| |
J Cell Biochem,
108,
43-51.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.V.Probst,
E.Dunleavy,
and
G.Almouzni
(2009).
Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
10,
192-206.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Musselman,
and
T.G.Kutateladze
(2009).
PHD fingers: epigenetic effectors and potential drug targets.
|
| |
Mol Interv,
9,
314-323.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Meilinger,
K.Fellinger,
S.Bultmann,
U.Rothbauer,
I.M.Bonapace,
W.E.Klinkert,
F.Spada,
and
H.Leonhardt
(2009).
Np95 interacts with de novo DNA methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, and mediates epigenetic silencing of the viral CMV promoter in embryonic stem cells.
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
10,
1259-1264.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Hashimoto,
J.R.Horton,
X.Zhang,
and
X.Cheng
(2009).
UHRF1, a modular multi-domain protein, regulates replication-coupled crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone modifications.
|
| |
Epigenetics,
4,
8.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
I.P.Pogribny,
and
F.A.Beland
(2009).
DNA hypomethylation in the origin and pathogenesis of human diseases.
|
| |
Cell Mol Life Sci,
66,
2249-2261.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Unoki,
J.D.Kelly,
D.E.Neal,
B.A.Ponder,
Y.Nakamura,
and
R.Hamamoto
(2009).
UHRF1 is a novel molecular marker for diagnosis and the prognosis of bladder cancer.
|
| |
Br J Cancer,
101,
98.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Bogdanović,
and
G.J.Veenstra
(2009).
DNA methylation and methyl-CpG binding proteins: developmental requirements and function.
|
| |
Chromosoma,
118,
549-565.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.A.Jones,
and
G.Liang
(2009).
Rethinking how DNA methylation patterns are maintained.
|
| |
Nat Rev Genet,
10,
805-811.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Jeong,
G.Liang,
S.Sharma,
J.C.Lin,
S.H.Choi,
H.Han,
C.B.Yoo,
G.Egger,
A.S.Yang,
and
P.A.Jones
(2009).
Selective anchoring of DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B to nucleosomes containing methylated DNA.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
29,
5366-5376.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Ooi,
A.H.O'Donnell,
and
T.H.Bestor
(2009).
Mammalian cytosine methylation at a glance.
|
| |
J Cell Sci,
122,
2787-2791.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Gateva,
J.K.Sandling,
G.Hom,
K.E.Taylor,
S.A.Chung,
X.Sun,
W.Ortmann,
R.Kosoy,
R.C.Ferreira,
G.Nordmark,
I.Gunnarsson,
E.Svenungsson,
L.Padyukov,
G.Sturfelt,
A.Jönsen,
A.A.Bengtsson,
S.Rantapää-Dahlqvist,
E.C.Baechler,
E.E.Brown,
G.S.Alarcón,
J.C.Edberg,
R.Ramsey-Goldman,
G.McGwin,
J.D.Reveille,
L.M.Vilá,
R.P.Kimberly,
S.Manzi,
M.A.Petri,
A.Lee,
P.K.Gregersen,
M.F.Seldin,
L.Rönnblom,
L.A.Criswell,
A.C.Syvänen,
T.W.Behrens,
and
R.R.Graham
(2009).
A large-scale replication study identifies TNIP1, PRDM1, JAZF1, UHRF1BP1 and IL10 as risk loci for systemic lupus erythematosus.
|
| |
Nat Genet,
41,
1228-1233.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |