 |
PDBsum entry 2fr4
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immune system/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2fr4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
374:1029-1040
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Impact of DNA Hairpin Folding Energetics on Antibody-ssDNA Association.
|
|
Z.Ou,
C.A.Bottoms,
M.T.Henzl,
J.J.Tanner.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Deposition of anti-DNA antibodies in the kidney contributes to the pathogenesis
of the autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus. Antibodies that bind to
hairpin-forming DNA ligands may be particularly prone to deposition. Here we
report the first structure of a Fab complexed with hairpin-forming DNA. The
ligand used for co-crystallization is 5'-d [CTG(CCTT)CAG]-3', which
has a predicted hairpin structure consisting of a four-nucleotide loop (CCTT)
and a stem of three base-pairs. The 1.95 A resolution crystal structure of Fab
DNA-1 complexed with this ligand shows that the conformation of the bound ligand
differs radically from the predicted hairpin conformation. The three base-pairs
in the stem are absent in the bound form. The protein binds to the last six
nucleotides at the 3' end of the ligand. These nucleotides form a loop
(TTCA) closed by a G:C base-pair in the bound state. Stacking of aromatic
side-chains against DNA bases is the dominant interaction in the complex.
Interactions with the DNA backbone are conspicuously absent. Thermodynamics of
binding are examined using isothermal titration calorimetry. The apparent
dissociation constant is 4 muM, and binding is enthalpically favorable and
entropically unfavorable. Increasing the number of base-pairs in the DNA stem
from three to six decreases binding affinity. These data suggest a
conformational selection binding mechanism in which the Fab binds preferentially
to the unstructured state of the ligand. In this interpretation, the ligand
binding and ligand folding equilibria are coupled, with lower hairpin stability
leading to greater effective binding affinity. Thus, pre-organization of the DNA
loop into the preferred binding conformation does not play a major role in
complexation. Rather, it is argued that the stem of the hairpin serves to reduce
the degrees of freedom in the free DNA ligand, thereby limiting the entropic
cost attendant to complexation with the Fab.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Secondary structure diagrams for the DNA ligands
used in this study. The three predicted hairpin conformations
for LIG1-17 are shown in (a)–(c). The predicted hairpin
conformation of LIG5-14 is shown in (d). The conformation of
LIG5-14 bound to Fab DNA-1 is depicted in (e). The black and
gray circles denote G:C and T:A base-pairs, respectively. The
open circle represents a G:T wobble base-pair.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Stereo view of one of the Fabs interacting with
nucleotides 9–14. Dotted lines indicated hydrogen bonds. DNA
is colored green. Light chain residues are colored magenta and
appear on the right hand side of the Figure. Heavy chain
residues are colored cyan and appear on the left hand side of
the Figure. Compared to Figure 4, the orientation is rotated by
about 180° around the vertical axis.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2007,
374,
1029-1040)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
');
}
}
 |
|