 |
PDBsum entry 1k1v
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1k1v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nat Struct Biol
9:252-256
(2002)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of MafG.
|
|
H.Kusunoki,
H.Motohashi,
F.Katsuoka,
A.Morohashi,
M.Yamamoto,
T.Tanaka.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The Maf family proteins, which constitute a subgroup of basic region-leucine
zipper (bZIP) proteins, function as transcriptional regulators of cellular
differentiation. Together with the basic region, the Maf extended homology
region (EHR), conserved only within the Maf family, defines the DNA binding
specific to Mafs. Here we present the first NMR-derived structure of the
DNA-binding domain (residues 1-76) of MafG, which contains the EHR and the basic
region. The structure consists of three alpha-helices and resembles the fold of
the DNA-binding domain of Skn-1, a developmental transcription factor of
Caenorhabditis elegans. The structural similarity between MafG and Skn-1 enables
us to propose a possible mechanism by which Maf family proteins recognize their
consensus DNA sequences.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. 3D structure of MafG(1 -76). a, Stereo view of a
best-fit superposition of the backbone atoms (N, C and
C') of the 20 NMR-derived structures of MafG(1 -76). The main
chain atoms of the 20 structures are superimposed against the
energy-minimized average structure using residues 24 -64. The 23
N-terminal and 12 C-terminal residues, which are not well
defined because they lack many experimental restraints, are
omitted throughout panels (a -d). b, Ribbon diagram of the
energy- minimized average structure of MafG(1 -76). The -helices
are shown in purple and labeled. c,d, Electrostatic potential
surfaces of MafG(1 -76). Positive and negative potentials are in
blue and red, respectively. The orientation of the image (d) is
the same as that in panel (b). The image in (c) is related to
that in (d) by a 180° rotation along the vertical axis.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Comparison of MafG(1 -76) with the Skn-1 DNA-binding
domain. a, DNA-binding domains of MafG (left) and Skn-1
(right) (PDB accession code 1SKN). The helices of MafG and the
corresponding regions of Skn-1 are in purple; the other helical
regions of Skn-1 are in cyan. b, DNA-binding surfaces of MafG
(left) and Skn-1 (right). The basic residues of MafG (Lys 53,
Arg 56, Arg 57 and Lys 60) and Skn-1 (Arg 503, Arg 506, Arg 507,
Arg 508 and Lys 510) are in blue. The five residues of Skn-1
that interact with the DNA bases and the corresponding residues
of MafG (only Asn 61 and Tyr 64 in this panel) are in green. Val
34, Arg 35 and Asn 38 of MafG and the corresponding residues of
Skn-1 are shown in red. c, Sequence alignment of the MafG and
Skn-1 DNA-binding domains (SWISS-PROT accession number P34707).
Secondary structure elements of MafG (upper) and Skn-1 (lower)
are shown. The residues that form the hydrophobic cores of MafG
and Skn-1 are underlined. The residues corresponding to the
colored residues in panel (b) are highlighted in a matching
color. The capping box sequences are indicated with asterisks.
Open and closed circles show the residues of Skn-1 that interact
with the bases and phosphate backbones of DNA, respectively. d,
DNA sequence used in the structure determination of the Skn-1
-DNA complex and its interaction with the NXXAAXXCR sequence of
Skn-1. The consensus recognition site of Skn-1 is boxed. The
AP-1 core region is in green. Hydrogen bonds and van der Waals
contacts are indicated by solid and dotted lines, respectively.
e, EMSA of MafG(1 -76) and its mutants using an oligonucleotide
containing the T-MARE-like sequence (probe #25 in ref. 5). The
concentrations of purified protein were 0 M
(lanes 1, 5, 9 and 13), 0.2 M
(lanes 2, 6, 10 and 14), 0.8 M
(lanes 3, 7, 11 and 15), and 3 M
(lanes 4, 8, 12 and 16).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Biol
(2002,
9,
252-256)
copyright 2002.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
D.Das,
N.V.Grishin,
A.Kumar,
D.Carlton,
C.Bakolitsa,
M.D.Miller,
P.Abdubek,
T.Astakhova,
H.L.Axelrod,
P.Burra,
C.Chen,
H.J.Chiu,
M.Chiu,
T.Clayton,
M.C.Deller,
L.Duan,
K.Ellrott,
D.Ernst,
C.L.Farr,
J.Feuerhelm,
A.Grzechnik,
S.K.Grzechnik,
J.C.Grant,
G.W.Han,
L.Jaroszewski,
K.K.Jin,
H.A.Johnson,
H.E.Klock,
M.W.Knuth,
P.Kozbial,
S.S.Krishna,
D.Marciano,
D.McMullan,
A.T.Morse,
E.Nigoghossian,
A.Nopakun,
L.Okach,
S.Oommachen,
J.Paulsen,
C.Puckett,
R.Reyes,
C.L.Rife,
N.Sefcovic,
H.J.Tien,
C.B.Trame,
H.van den Bedem,
D.Weekes,
T.Wooten,
Q.Xu,
K.O.Hodgson,
J.Wooley,
M.A.Elsliger,
A.M.Deacon,
A.Godzik,
S.A.Lesley,
and
I.A.Wilson
(2010).
The structure of the first representative of Pfam family PF09836 reveals a two-domain organization and suggests involvement in transcriptional regulation.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
66,
1174-1181.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Kurokawa,
H.Motohashi,
S.Sueno,
M.Kimura,
H.Takagawa,
Y.Kanno,
M.Yamamoto,
and
T.Tanaka
(2009).
Structural basis of alternative DNA recognition by Maf transcription factors.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
29,
6232-6244.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Miller
(2009).
The importance of being flexible: the case of basic region leucine zipper transcriptional regulators.
|
| |
Curr Protein Pept Sci,
10,
244-269.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Kimura,
T.Yamamoto,
J.Zhang,
K.Itoh,
M.Kyo,
T.Kamiya,
H.Aburatani,
F.Katsuoka,
H.Kurokawa,
T.Tanaka,
H.Motohashi,
and
M.Yamamoto
(2007).
Molecular basis distinguishing the DNA binding profile of Nrf2-Maf heterodimer from that of Maf homodimer.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
33681-33690.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Motohashi,
F.Katsuoka,
C.Miyoshi,
Y.Uchimura,
H.Saitoh,
C.Francastel,
J.D.Engel,
and
M.Yamamoto
(2006).
MafG sumoylation is required for active transcriptional repression.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
26,
4652-4663.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Yamamoto,
M.Kyo,
T.Kamiya,
T.Tanaka,
J.D.Engel,
H.Motohashi,
and
M.Yamamoto
(2006).
Predictive base substitution rules that determine the binding and transcriptional specificity of Maf recognition elements.
|
| |
Genes Cells,
11,
575-591.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Vanita,
D.Singh,
P.N.Robinson,
K.Sperling,
and
J.R.Singh
(2006).
A novel mutation in the DNA-binding domain of MAF at 16q23.1 associated with autosomal dominant "cerulean cataract" in an Indian family.
|
| |
Am J Med Genet A,
140,
558-566.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Massrieh,
A.Derjuga,
F.Doualla-Bell,
C.Y.Ku,
B.M.Sanborn,
and
V.Blank
(2006).
Regulation of the MAFF transcription factor by proinflammatory cytokines in myometrial cells.
|
| |
Biol Reprod,
74,
699-705.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Katsuoka,
H.Motohashi,
T.Ishii,
H.Aburatani,
J.D.Engel,
and
M.Yamamoto
(2005).
Genetic evidence that small maf proteins are essential for the activation of antioxidant response element-dependent genes.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
25,
8044-8051.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Kobayashi,
and
M.Yamamoto
(2005).
Molecular mechanisms activating the Nrf2-Keap1 pathway of antioxidant gene regulation.
|
| |
Antioxid Redox Signal,
7,
385-394.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Yoshida,
T.Ohkumo,
S.Ishibashi,
and
K.Yasuda
(2005).
The 5'-AT-rich half-site of Maf recognition element: a functional target for bZIP transcription factor Maf.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
33,
3465-3478.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.M.Reza,
and
K.Yasuda
(2004).
Roles of Maf family proteins in lens development.
|
| |
Dev Dyn,
229,
440-448.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Motohashi,
F.Katsuoka,
J.D.Engel,
and
M.Yamamoto
(2004).
Small Maf proteins serve as transcriptional cofactors for keratinocyte differentiation in the Keap1-Nrf2 regulatory pathway.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
101,
6379-6384.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Kyo,
T.Yamamoto,
H.Motohashi,
T.Kamiya,
T.Kuroita,
T.Tanaka,
J.D.Engel,
B.Kawakami,
and
M.Yamamoto
(2004).
Evaluation of MafG interaction with Maf recognition element arrays by surface plasmon resonance imaging technique.
|
| |
Genes Cells,
9,
153-164.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.A.McLaughlin,
D.W.Kulp,
J.de la Cruz,
X.J.Lu,
C.L.Lawson,
and
H.M.Berman
(2004).
A structure-based method for identifying DNA-binding proteins and their sites of DNA-interaction.
|
| |
J Struct Funct Genomics,
5,
255-265.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |