 |
PDBsum entry 1e15
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
97:5842-5847
(2000)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of a two-domain chitotriosidase from Serratia marcescens at 1.9-A resolution.
|
|
D.M.van Aalten,
B.Synstad,
M.B.Brurberg,
E.Hough,
B.W.Riise,
V.G.Eijsink,
R.K.Wierenga.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
In this paper, we describe the structure of chitinase B from Serratia
marcescens, which consists of a catalytic domain with a TIM-barrel fold and a
49-residue C-terminal chitin-binding domain. This chitinase is the first
structure of a bacterial exochitinase, and it represents one of only a few
examples of a glycosyl hydrolase structure having interacting catalytic and
substrate-binding domains. The chitin-binding domain has exposed aromatic
residues that contribute to a 55-A long continuous aromatic stretch extending
into the active site. Binding of chitin oligomers is blocked beyond the -3
subsite, which explains why the enzyme has chitotriosidase activity and degrades
the chitin chain from the nonreducing end. Comparison of the chitinase B
structure with that of chitinase A explains why these enzymes act
synergistically in the degradation of chitin.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. (A) Comparison of experimental and final maps. An
area around the active site residue Glu144 is drawn in a stick
representation. A 1 contoured
F[o], MLPHARE map
is shown in black, calculated by using the phases at the end of
heavy atom refinement with MLPHARE. A 2F[o]-F[c], [calc] map is
shown at the end of refinement with CNS, contoured at 1.4 (in red).
(B) The two molecules in the asymmetric unit, color-coded to
identify various regions. The TIM barrel (gray), the / -domain
(yellow), the support loop (red), the linker (blue), and the
ChBD (green). (C) ChiB, as in Fig. 2B, with the flexible loop
covering the active site (green), the active site residue (red
sticks), the porch loop (orange), and the exposed aromatic
residues (black sticks). (D) Superposition of the ChBD of ChiB
(blue ribbon) and the CeBD of endoglucanase Cel5 (gray ribbon).
Most of the support loop of the catalytic domain of ChiB is
shown as a dark-blue ribbon. Trp252 also is shown in magenta.
The substrate-binding residues for the CeBD are shown in yellow,
and the equivalent residues in the ChBD are shown in magenta.
The disulfide bond between the termini of the CeBD is shown in
green. Polar residues lining the path of aromatic residues in
ChiB are shown in magenta. Labels correspond to the ChiB
sequence. Note the almost exact overlap of the conserved -strands.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. (A) Stereo view of the active site with the
modeled chitotetraose (same view as in Fig. 1C). The ChiB
backbone is shown as a yellow ribbon. The modeled chitotetraose
is shown in a stick representation, with the carbons colored
green. Side chains within 5 Å of the chitotetraose are
depicted by gray sticks, and also are indicated in Fig. 1.
Possible hydrogen bonds are drawn as black dashed lines, and the
residues involved are indicated in Fig. 1. The four water
molecules that are predicted to be replaced by the substrate are
shown as blue transparent spheres. The GlcNAc residues are
labeled from 3 to +1,
corresponding to their location with respect to the active site
residue (15). The loop around residue 316, partially covering
the active site, is shown in magenta. (B) Stereo view of the
interior of the ChiB TIM barrel. The strands forming the TIM
barrel are shown as a yellow ribbon. Side chains of residues
lining the inside of the barrel are shown as sticks. Side chains
conserved in ChiA, ChiB, and hevamine are colored magenta. Water
molecules in the structure are shown as red spheres. Hydrogen
bonds are shown as black dashed lines. Conserved residues are
labeled according to the ChiB sequence. Part of the
chitotetraose model is shown as sticks, with carbon atoms
colored orange. (C) Stereo view of a superposition of ChiA and
ChiB. Both structures are shown in a ribbon representation. ChiB
is colored yellow, except for residues that correspond to
insertions in ChiB with respect to ChiA, which are colored red.
ChiA is colored gray except for residues that correspond to
insertions in ChiA with respect to ChiB, which are colored
green. Some insertions are indicated with two-letter labels. AA,
active site covering loop in ChiA; AB, active site covering loop
in ChiB; CD, ChBD in ChiB; DL, ChBD support loop in ChiB; FD,
fibronectin domain in ChiA; LI, linker in ChiB; PO, porch loop
in ChiB.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
S.Gruber,
G.Vaaje-Kolstad,
F.Matarese,
R.López-Mondéjar,
C.P.Kubicek,
and
V.Seidl-Seiboth
(2011).
Analysis of subgroup C of fungal chitinases containing chitin-binding and LysM modules in the mycoparasite Trichoderma atroviride.
|
| |
Glycobiology,
21,
122-133.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Neeraja,
K.Anil,
P.Purushotham,
K.Suma,
P.Sarma,
B.M.Moerschbacher,
and
A.R.Podile
(2010).
Biotechnological approaches to develop bacterial chitinases as a bioshield against fungal diseases of plants.
|
| |
Crit Rev Biotechnol,
30,
231-241.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Khoushab,
and
M.Yamabhai
(2010).
Chitin research revisited.
|
| |
Mar Drugs,
8,
1988-2012.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Li,
and
L.H.Greene
(2010).
Sequence and structural analysis of the chitinase insertion domain reveals two conserved motifs involved in chitin-binding.
|
| |
PLoS One,
5,
e8654.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Tsuji,
S.Nishimura,
T.Inui,
Y.Kado,
K.Ishikawa,
T.Nakamura,
and
K.Uegaki
(2010).
Kinetic and crystallographic analyses of the catalytic domain of chitinase from Pyrococcus furiosus- the role of conserved residues in the active site.
|
| |
FEBS J,
277,
2683-2695.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Mehmood,
Y.Gai,
Q.Zhuang,
F.Wang,
X.Xiao,
and
F.Wang
(2010).
Aeromonas caviae CB101 contains four chitinases encoded by a single gene chi1.
|
| |
Mol Biotechnol,
44,
213-220.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Kezuka,
M.Kojima,
R.Mizuno,
K.Suzuki,
T.Watanabe,
and
T.Nonaka
(2010).
Structure of full-length class I chitinase from rice revealed by X-ray crystallography and small-angle X-ray scattering.
|
| |
Proteins,
78,
2295-2305.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.B.Duzhak,
Z.I.Panfilova,
T.G.Duzhak,
and
E.A.Vasyunina
(2009).
Extracellular chitinases of mutant superproducing strain Serratia marcescens M-1.
|
| |
Biochemistry (Mosc),
74,
209-214.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.P.Lin,
H.H.Chuang,
Y.H.Liu,
C.Y.Hsieh,
P.W.Lin,
and
H.Y.Lin
(2009).
Effects of C-terminal amino acids truncation on enzyme properties of Aeromonas caviae D1 chitinase.
|
| |
Arch Microbiol,
191,
265-273.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Vaaje-Kolstad,
A.C.Bunaes,
G.Mathiesen,
and
V.G.Eijsink
(2009).
The chitinolytic system of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis comprises a nonprocessive chitinase and a chitin-binding protein that promotes the degradation of alpha- and beta-chitin.
|
| |
FEBS J,
276,
2402-2415.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Zakariassen,
B.B.Aam,
S.J.Horn,
K.M.Vårum,
M.Sørlie,
and
V.G.Eijsink
(2009).
Aromatic residues in the catalytic center of chitinase A from Serratia marcescens affect processivity, enzyme activity, and biomass converting efficiency.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
10610-10617.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.S.Zhao,
Q.C.Zheng,
H.X.Zhang,
H.Y.Chu,
and
C.C.Sun
(2009).
Analysis of a three-dimensional structure of human acidic mammalian chitinase obtained by homology modeling and ligand binding studies.
|
| |
J Mol Model,
15,
499-505.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Synstad,
G.Vaaje-Kolstad,
F.H.Cederkvist,
S.F.Saua,
S.J.Horn,
V.G.Eijsink,
and
M.Sørlie
(2008).
Expression and characterization of endochitinase C from Serratia marcescens BJL200 and its purification by a one-step general chitinase purification method.
|
| |
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem,
72,
715-723.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Petter,
C.Scholz,
H.Wessner,
G.Hansen,
P.Henklein,
T.Watanabe,
and
W.Höhne
(2008).
Phage display screening for peptidic chitinase inhibitors.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
21,
401-409.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.H.Chuang,
H.Y.Lin,
and
F.P.Lin
(2008).
Biochemical characteristics of C-terminal region of recombinant chitinase from Bacillus licheniformis: implication of necessity for enzyme properties.
|
| |
FEBS J,
275,
2240-2254.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Karlsson,
and
J.Stenlid
(2008).
Comparative Evolutionary Histories of the Fungal Chitinase Gene Family Reveal Non-Random Size Expansions and Contractions due to Adaptive Natural Selection.
|
| |
Evol Bioinform Online,
4,
47-60.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Zhu,
Y.Arakane,
D.Banerjee,
R.W.Beeman,
K.J.Kramer,
and
S.Muthukrishnan
(2008).
Domain organization and phylogenetic analysis of the chitinase-like family of proteins in three species of insects.
|
| |
Insect Biochem Mol Biol,
38,
452-466.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.G.Eijsink,
G.Vaaje-Kolstad,
K.M.Vårum,
and
S.J.Horn
(2008).
Towards new enzymes for biofuels: lessons from chitinase research.
|
| |
Trends Biotechnol,
26,
228-235.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.H.Chuang,
and
F.P.Lin
(2007).
New role of C-terminal 30 amino acids on the insoluble chitin hydrolysis in actively engineered chitinase from Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
|
| |
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol,
76,
123-133.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Kadokura,
Y.Sakamoto,
K.Saito,
T.Ikegami,
T.Hirano,
W.Hakamata,
T.Oku,
and
T.Nishio
(2007).
Production and Secretion of a Recombinant Vibrio parahaemolyticus Chitinase by Escherichia coli and Its Purification from the Culture Medium.
|
| |
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem,
71,
2848-2851.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Hurtado-Guerrero,
and
D.M.van Aalten
(2007).
Structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chitinase 1 and screening-based discovery of potent inhibitors.
|
| |
Chem Biol,
14,
589-599.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Park,
C.W.Kim,
H.Kim,
J.S.Jung,
and
G.E.Harman
(2007).
Cloning and high-level production of a chitinase from Chromobacterium sp. and the role of conserved or nonconserved residues on its catalytic activity.
|
| |
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol,
74,
791-804.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Nakamura,
S.Mine,
Y.Hagihara,
K.Ishikawa,
and
K.Uegaki
(2007).
Structure of the catalytic domain of the hyperthermophilic chitinase from Pyrococcus furiosus.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
63,
7.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
F.H.Cederkvist,
A.D.Zamfir,
S.Bahrke,
V.G.Eijsink,
M.Sørlie,
J.Peter-Katalinić,
and
M.G.Peter
(2006).
Identification of a high-affinity-binding oligosaccharide by (+) nanoelectrospray quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry of a noncovalent enzyme-ligand complex.
|
| |
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl,
45,
2429-2434.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Horn,
A.Sørbotten,
B.Synstad,
P.Sikorski,
M.Sørlie,
K.M.Vårum,
and
V.G.Eijsink
(2006).
Endo/exo mechanism and processivity of family 18 chitinases produced by Serratia marcescens.
|
| |
FEBS J,
273,
491-503.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Horn,
P.Sikorski,
J.B.Cederkvist,
G.Vaaje-Kolstad,
M.Sørlie,
B.Synstad,
G.Vriend,
K.M.Vårum,
and
V.G.Eijsink
(2006).
Costs and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
18089-18094.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.S.Klemsdal,
J.L.Clarke,
I.A.Hoell,
V.G.Eijsink,
and
M.B.Brurberg
(2006).
Molecular cloning, characterization, and expression studies of a novel chitinase gene (ech30) from the mycoparasite Trichoderma atroviride strain P1.
|
| |
FEMS Microbiol Lett,
256,
282-289.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Kawase,
S.Yokokawa,
A.Saito,
T.Fujii,
N.Nikaidou,
K.Miyashita,
and
T.Watanabe
(2006).
Comparison of enzymatic and antifungal properties between family 18 and 19 chitinases from S. coelicolor A3(2).
|
| |
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem,
70,
988-998.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Fokine,
P.G.Leiman,
M.M.Shneider,
B.Ahvazi,
K.M.Boeshans,
A.C.Steven,
L.W.Black,
V.V.Mesyanzhinov,
and
M.G.Rossmann
(2005).
Structural and functional similarities between the capsid proteins of bacteriophages T4 and HK97 point to a common ancestry.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
7163-7168.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Sørbotten,
S.J.Horn,
V.G.Eijsink,
and
K.M.Vårum
(2005).
Degradation of chitosans with chitinase B from Serratia marcescens. Production of chito-oligosaccharides and insight into enzyme processivity.
|
| |
FEBS J,
272,
538-549.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.V.Rao,
O.A.Andersen,
K.A.Vora,
J.A.Demartino,
and
D.M.van Aalten
(2005).
Methylxanthine drugs are chitinase inhibitors: investigation of inhibition and binding modes.
|
| |
Chem Biol,
12,
973-980.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Orikoshi,
S.Nakayama,
C.Hanato,
K.Miyamoto,
and
H.Tsujibo
(2005).
Role of the N-terminal polycystic kidney disease domain in chitin degradation by chitinase A from a marine bacterium, Alteromonas sp. strain O-7.
|
| |
J Appl Microbiol,
99,
551-557.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Sikorski,
B.T.Stokke,
A.Sørbotten,
K.M.Vårum,
S.J.Horn,
and
V.G.Eijsink
(2005).
Development and application of a model for chitosan hydrolysis by a family 18 chitinase.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
77,
273-285.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Li,
F.Wang,
Y.Zhou,
and
X.Xiao
(2005).
Putative exposed aromatic and hydroxyl residues on the surface of the N-terminal domains of Chi1 from Aeromonas caviae CB101 are essential for chitin binding and hydrolysis.
|
| |
Appl Environ Microbiol,
71,
7559-7561.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Synstad,
S.Gåseidnes,
D.M.Van Aalten,
G.Vriend,
J.E.Nielsen,
and
V.G.Eijsink
(2004).
Mutational and computational analysis of the role of conserved residues in the active site of a family 18 chitinase.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem,
271,
253-262.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.C.Chang,
P.L.Lai,
and
M.L.Wu
(2004).
Biochemical characterization and site-directed mutational analysis of the double chitin-binding domain from chitinase 92 of Aeromonas hydrophila JP101.
|
| |
FEMS Microbiol Lett,
232,
61-66.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Matsui,
T.Kumasaka,
K.Endo,
T.Sato,
S.Nakamura,
and
N.Tanaka
(2004).
Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of chitinase F1 (ChiF1) from the alkaliphilic Nocardiopsis sp. strain F96.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
60,
2016-2018.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.P.Wang,
Q.Li,
Y.Zhou,
M.G.Li,
and
X.Xiao
(2003).
The C-terminal module of Chi1 from Aeromonas caviae CB101 has a function in substrate binding and hydrolysis.
|
| |
Proteins,
53,
908-916.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Orikoshi,
N.Baba,
S.Nakayama,
H.Kashu,
K.Miyamoto,
M.Yasuda,
Y.Inamori,
and
H.Tsujibo
(2003).
Molecular analysis of the gene encoding a novel cold-adapted chitinase (ChiB) from a marine bacterium, Alteromonas sp. strain O-7.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
185,
1153-1160.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Tsujibo,
T.Kubota,
M.Yamamoto,
K.Miyamoto,
and
Y.Inamori
(2003).
Characterization of chitinase genes from an alkaliphilic actinomycete, Nocardiopsis prasina OPC-131.
|
| |
Appl Environ Microbiol,
69,
894-900.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Gao,
M.W.Bauer,
K.R.Shockley,
M.A.Pysz,
and
R.M.Kelly
(2003).
Growth of hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus on chitin involves two family 18 chitinases.
|
| |
Appl Environ Microbiol,
69,
3119-3128.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Uchiyama,
R.Kaneko,
J.Yamaguchi,
A.Inoue,
T.Yanagida,
N.Nikaidou,
M.Regue,
and
T.Watanabe
(2003).
Uptake of N,N'-diacetylchitobiose [(GlcNAc)2] via the phosphotransferase system is essential for chitinase production by Serratia marcescens 2170.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
185,
1776-1782.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Papanikolau,
G.Tavlas,
C.E.Vorgias,
and
K.Petratos
(2003).
De novo purification scheme and crystallization conditions yield high-resolution structures of chitinase A and its complex with the inhibitor allosamidin.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
59,
400-403.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.R.Houston,
K.Shiomi,
N.Arai,
S.Omura,
M.G.Peter,
A.Turberg,
B.Synstad,
V.G.Eijsink,
and
D.M.van Aalten
(2002).
High-resolution structures of a chitinase complexed with natural product cyclopentapeptide inhibitors: mimicry of carbohydrate substrate.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
99,
9127-9132.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Kolstad,
B.Synstad,
V.G.Eijsink,
and
D.M.van Aalten
(2002).
Structure of the D140N mutant of chitinase B from Serratia marcescens at 1.45 A resolution.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
58,
377-379.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Suzuki,
N.Sugawara,
M.Suzuki,
T.Uchiyama,
F.Katouno,
N.Nikaidou,
and
T.Watanabe
(2002).
Chitinases A, B, and C1 of Serratia marcescens 2170 produced by recombinant Escherichia coli: enzymatic properties and synergism on chitin degradation.
|
| |
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem,
66,
1075-1083.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.V.Zverlov,
K.P.Fuchs,
and
W.H.Schwarz
(2002).
Chi18A, the endochitinase in the cellulosome of the thermophilic, cellulolytic bacterium Clostridium thermocellum.
|
| |
Appl Environ Microbiol,
68,
3176-3179.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Jablonowski,
L.Fichtner,
V.J.Martin,
R.Klassen,
F.Meinhardt,
M.J.Stark,
and
R.Schaffrath
(2001).
Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall chitin, the Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin receptor.
|
| |
Yeast,
18,
1285-1299.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.M.van Aalten,
D.Komander,
B.Synstad,
S.Gåseidnes,
M.G.Peter,
and
V.G.Eijsink
(2001).
Structural insights into the catalytic mechanism of a family 18 exo-chitinase.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
98,
8979-8984.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Bourne,
and
B.Henrissat
(2001).
Glycoside hydrolases and glycosyltransferases: families and functional modules.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
11,
593-600.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |