 |
PDBsum entry 1a6p
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell adhesion
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1a6p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nat Struct Biol
5:778-782
(1998)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Engineering an intertwined form of CD2 for stability and assembly.
|
|
A.J.Murray,
J.G.Head,
J.J.Barker,
R.L.Brady.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The amino-terminal domain of CD2 has the remarkable ability to fold in two ways:
either as a monomer or as an intertwined, metastable dimer. Here we show that it
is possible to differentially stabilize either fold by engineering the CD2
sequence, mimicking random mutagenesis events that could occur during molecular
evolution. Crystal structures of a hinge-deletion mutant, which is stable as an
intertwined dimer, reveal domain rotations that enable the protein to further
assemble to a tetramer. These results demonstrate that a variety of folds can be
adopted by a single polypeptide sequence, and provide guidance for the design of
proteins capable of further assembly.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Stereo C traces
depicting the crystal structures of a, the wild type intertwined
dimer, with the enclosed hydrophilic interface, and b, in a
similar orientation, the 46
47
deletion mutant intertwined dimer in the P4[3] crystal form
(forms I and II). The hydrophilic interface is now in an
'exposed' conformation. When crystallized under high-salt
conditions (crystal form III) c, this same structure is also
observed, but now a tetramer is formed in which a second
intertwined dimer binds with both hydrophilic interfaces
interlocked to form a central, extended -barrel.
The spheres identify the location of equivalent residues
(position 49) central to each polypeptide chain, illustrating
their close proximity in the tetramer and hence the feasibility
of further exchange of polypeptide chains in this region to form
a fully intertwined tetramer.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Stereo view of electron density (3F[o] - 2F[c]
coefficients, contoured at 1 )
from the hinge region residues in the P4[3], type I, crystal
form of the 46
47
deletion mutant intertwined dimer. The deletion site is
adjacent to the proline in the center of the figure.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Biol
(1998,
5,
778-782)
copyright 1998.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.Vendome,
S.Posy,
X.Jin,
F.Bahna,
G.Ahlsen,
L.Shapiro,
and
B.Honig
(2011).
Molecular design principles underlying β-strand swapping in the adhesive dimerization of cadherins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
693-700.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Yadid,
N.Kirshenbaum,
M.Sharon,
O.Dym,
and
D.S.Tawfik
(2010).
Metamorphic proteins mediate evolutionary transitions of structure.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
7287-7292.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Shameer,
G.Pugalenthi,
K.K.Kandaswamy,
P.N.Suganthan,
G.Archunan,
and
R.Sowdhamini
(2010).
Insights into Protein Sequence and Structure-Derived Features Mediating 3D Domain Swapping Mechanism using Support Vector Machine Based Approach.
|
| |
Bioinform Biol Insights,
4,
33-42.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Sundaramurthy,
K.Shameer,
R.Sreenivasan,
S.Gakkhar,
and
R.Sowdhamini
(2010).
HORI: a web server to compute Higher Order Residue Interactions in protein structures.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
11,
S24.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Launay,
and
T.Simonson
(2008).
Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
9,
427.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Posy,
L.Shapiro,
and
B.Honig
(2008).
Sequence and structural determinants of strand swapping in cadherin domains: do all cadherins bind through the same adhesive interface?
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
378,
954-968.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Ding,
K.C.Prutzman,
S.L.Campbell,
and
N.V.Dokholyan
(2006).
Topological determinants of protein domain swapping.
|
| |
Structure,
14,
5.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Bennett,
M.R.Sawaya,
and
D.Eisenberg
(2006).
Deposition diseases and 3D domain swapping.
|
| |
Structure,
14,
811-824.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Merlino,
M.A.Ceruso,
L.Vitagliano,
and
L.Mazzarella
(2005).
Open interface and large quaternary structure movements in 3D domain swapped proteins: insights from molecular dynamics simulations of the C-terminal swapped dimer of ribonuclease A.
|
| |
Biophys J,
88,
2003-2012.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Zhang,
and
J.Skolnick
(2005).
TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
33,
2302-2309.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Korostelev,
M.O.Fenley,
and
M.S.Chapman
(2004).
Impact of a Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatic restraint on protein structures refined at medium resolution.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
60,
1786-1794.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Fabiola,
R.Bertram,
A.Korostelev,
and
M.S.Chapman
(2002).
An improved hydrogen bond potential: impact on medium resolution protein structures.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
11,
1415-1423.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.Newcomer
(2002).
Protein folding and three-dimensional domain swapping: a strained relationship?
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
12,
48-53.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Rousseau,
J.W.Schymkowitz,
H.R.Wilkinson,
and
L.S.Itzhaki
(2001).
Three-dimensional domain swapping in p13suc1 occurs in the unfolded state and is controlled by conserved proline residues.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
98,
5596-5601.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.W.Schymkowitz,
F.Rousseau,
H.R.Wilkinson,
A.Friedler,
and
L.S.Itzhaki
(2001).
Observation of signal transduction in three-dimensional domain swapping.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol,
8,
888-892.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.V.Kishan,
M.E.Newcomer,
T.H.Rhodes,
and
S.D.Guilliot
(2001).
Effect of pH and salt bridges on structural assembly: molecular structures of the monomer and intertwined dimer of the Eps8 SH3 domain.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
10,
1046-1055.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Schiering,
E.Casale,
P.Caccia,
P.Giordano,
and
C.Battistini
(2000).
Dimer formation through domain swapping in the crystal structure of the Grb2-SH2-Ac-pYVNV complex.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
39,
13376-13382.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.E.Fisher,
P.E.Marszalek,
A.F.Oberhauser,
M.Carrion-Vazquez,
and
J.M.Fernandez
(1999).
The micro-mechanics of single molecules studied with atomic force microscopy.
|
| |
J Physiol,
520,
5.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |