|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Immune system
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Viral chemokine binding protein m3 from murine gammaherpesvirus68 in complex with the p8a variant of cc-chemokine mcp-1
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
M3 protein. Chain: a. Engineered: yes. Small inducible cytokine. Chain: d. Synonym: ccl2, monocyte chemotactic protein 1, mcp-1, monocyte chemotactic protein 1, mcp-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, monocyte chemotactic and activating factor, mcaf, monocyte secretory protein je, hc11.
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Murid herpesvirus 4. Murine herpesvirus 68. Organism_taxid: 33708. Gene: m3. Expressed in: spodoptera frugiperda. Expression_system_taxid: 7108. Expression_system_cell_line: sf9. Homo sapiens. Human.
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Dodecamer (from PDB file)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.80Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.201
|
R-free:
|
0.282
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
J.M.Alexander,D.H.Fremont
|
Key ref:
|
 |
J.M.Alexander
et al.
(2002).
Structural basis of chemokine sequestration by a herpesvirus decoy receptor.
Cell,
111,
343-356.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
29-Aug-02
|
Release date:
|
13-Nov-02
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Cell
111:343-356
(2002)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural basis of chemokine sequestration by a herpesvirus decoy receptor.
|
|
J.M.Alexander,
C.A.Nelson,
V.van Berkel,
E.K.Lau,
J.M.Studts,
T.J.Brett,
S.H.Speck,
T.M.Handel,
H.W.Virgin,
D.H.Fremont.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The M3 protein encoded by murine gamma herpesvirus68 (gamma HV68) functions as
an immune system saboteur by the engagement of chemoattractant cytokines,
thereby altering host antiviral inflammatory responses. Here we report the
crystal structures of M3 both alone and in complex with the CC chemokine MCP-1.
M3 is a two-domain beta sandwich protein with a unique sequence and topology,
forming a tightly packed anti-parallel dimer. The stoichiometry of the MCP-1:M3
complex is 2:2, with two monomeric chemokines embedded at distal ends of the
preassociated M3 dimer. Conformational flexibility and electrostatic
complementation are both used by M3 to achieve high-affinity and broad-spectrum
chemokine engagement. M3 also employs structural mimicry to promiscuously
sequester chemokines, engaging conservative structural elements associated with
both chemokine homodimerization and binding to G protein-coupled receptors.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Promiscuous Chemokine Binding Facilitated by M3
Conformational Plasticity and Electrostatic Complementation(A)
Comparison of the chemokine binding clefts of M3 alone and the
M3/MCP-1 complex. The top image depicts the open and closed
niches found in the preassociated asymmetric homodimer, viewed
looking edgewise into the binding sites. Chemokine contact
residues highlighted in blue (CTD) and cyan (NTD) and the
corresponding loops that create the binding cleft are labeled.
The middle image is a cartoon depicting the asymmetric
conformation of M3 alone and the symmetric dimer formed in
complex with chemokine. Below is the edgewise view of the M3
chemokine binding cleft with MCP-1 bound, depicted in
magenta.(B) Electrostatic complementarity between M3 and
chemokines. On the right is the surface electrostatic potentials
of the asymmetric M3 dimer (upper image) and the symmetric
M3/MCP-1(P8A) complex (lower image). The view is rotated 90°
relative to the edgewise orientation seen in (A). Negative and
positive electrostatic potentials are mapped to the surfaces in
red and blue for ± 15 KeV using GRASP. In the lower
image, M3 and the chemokines are pulled apart to show their
matched surfaces and charge potentials.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Structural Mimicry of Chemokine Dimer Formation
and GPCR Receptor Binding(A) Tube and surface representations of
the M3 sequestration of MCP-1(P8A). M3 NTD and CTD loops are
depicted in cyan, and the chemokine in magenta. Cys residues are
in yellow. Directly below is the same view depicting the MCP-1
(P8A) surface engaged by M3, with the intensity of the magenta
surface increased for shorter contact distances between 2.5 and
4 Å. The acidic NTD s2b-s3 loop, which engages the N-loop
region, and the CTD A-B loop, which forms an anti-parallel β
interaction with the N-terminal segment of MCP-1, are shown as
cyan tubes with their side chains displayed.(B) CC-chemokine
homodimerization as observed for MCP-1 (1DOK). Displayed is the
homodimer of MCP-1 with the magenta monomer oriented as
MCP-1(P8A) in (A). The dimer is formed dominantly by the
anti-parallel β interaction between N-terminal regions. Below
is the contact surface, highlighting the role of MCP-1 Pro8,
which is situated above the chemokine invariant Cys12-Cys52
disulfide bond in precisely the same location as M3 ProP272 in
the M3/MCP-1(P8A) complex.(C) Displayed is the NMR structure of
dimeric IL-8 in complex with a modified peptide from the N
terminus of the IL-8 receptor CXCR-1 (1ILQ). The CXC dimer is
displayed in magenta and blue and is formed through the extended
sheet formed between monomer β1-strands. The CXCR-1 receptor
fragment also binds to the N-terminal chemokine region in an
anti-parallel fashion, with Pro29 similarly packed on top of the
Cys12-Cys52 disulfide bond. Further, this receptor fragment also
engages the N-loop region with a highly acidic cluster of
residues, very similar in location to where the M3 NTD s2b-s3
loop engages MCP-1(P8A).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Cell
(2002,
111,
343-356)
copyright 2002.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
E.Barton,
P.Mandal,
and
S.H.Speck
(2011).
Pathogenesis and host control of gammaherpesviruses: lessons from the mouse.
|
| |
Annu Rev Immunol,
29,
351-397.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Kucera,
L.M.Harrison,
M.Cappello,
and
Y.Modis
(2011).
Ancylostoma ceylanicum excretory-secretory protein 2 adopts a netrin-like fold and defines a novel family of nematode proteins.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
408,
9.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.D.Flad,
and
E.Brandt
(2010).
Platelet-derived chemokines: pathophysiology and therapeutic aspects.
|
| |
Cell Mol Life Sci,
67,
2363-2386.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.L.Galzi,
M.Hachet-Haas,
D.Bonnet,
F.Daubeuf,
S.Lecat,
M.Hibert,
J.Haiech,
and
N.Frossard
(2010).
Neutralizing endogenous chemokines with small molecules. Principles and potential therapeutic applications.
|
| |
Pharmacol Ther,
126,
39-55.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Müller,
G.Zocher,
A.Steinle,
and
T.Stehle
(2010).
Structure of the HCMV UL16-MICB complex elucidates select binding of a viral immunoevasin to diverse NKG2D ligands.
|
| |
PLoS Pathog,
6,
e1000723.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.R.Van de Walle,
B.B.Kaufer,
N.Chbab,
and
N.Osterrieder
(2009).
Analysis of the Herpesvirus Chemokine-binding Glycoprotein G Residues Essential for Chemokine Binding and Biological Activity.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
5968-5976.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.M.Dias,
C.Losberger,
M.Déruaz,
C.A.Power,
A.E.Proudfoot,
and
J.P.Shaw
(2009).
Structural basis of chemokine sequestration by a tick chemokine binding protein: the crystal structure of the complex between Evasin-1 and CCL3.
|
| |
PLoS One,
4,
e8514.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Shang,
N.Thirunarayanan,
A.Viejo-Borbolla,
A.P.Martin,
M.Bogunovic,
F.Marchesi,
J.C.Unkeless,
Y.Ho,
G.C.Furtado,
A.Alcami,
M.Merad,
L.Mayer,
and
S.A.Lira
(2009).
Expression of the chemokine binding protein M3 promotes marked changes in the accumulation of specific leukocytes subsets within the intestine.
|
| |
Gastroenterology,
137,
1006.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.W.Bahar,
J.C.Kenyon,
M.M.Putz,
N.G.Abrescia,
J.E.Pease,
E.L.Wise,
D.I.Stuart,
G.L.Smith,
and
J.M.Grimes
(2008).
Structure and function of A41, a vaccinia virus chemokine binding protein.
|
| |
PLoS Pathog,
4,
e5.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Frauenschuh,
C.A.Power,
M.Déruaz,
B.R.Ferreira,
J.S.Silva,
M.M.Teixeira,
J.M.Dias,
T.Martin,
T.N.Wells,
and
A.E.Proudfoot
(2007).
Molecular cloning and characterization of a highly selective chemokine-binding protein from the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
27250-27258.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.M.Alexander-Brett,
and
D.H.Fremont
(2007).
Dual GPCR and GAG mimicry by the M3 chemokine decoy receptor.
|
| |
J Exp Med,
204,
3157-3172.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Alejo,
M.B.Ruiz-Argüello,
Y.Ho,
V.P.Smith,
M.Saraiva,
and
A.Alcami
(2006).
A chemokine-binding domain in the tumor necrosis factor receptor from variola (smallpox) virus.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
5995-6000.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Henschel,
W.K.Kim,
and
M.Schroeder
(2006).
Equivalent binding sites reveal convergently evolved interaction motifs.
|
| |
Bioinformatics,
22,
550-555.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Mantovani,
R.Bonecchi,
and
M.Locati
(2006).
Tuning inflammation and immunity by chemokine sequestration: decoys and more.
|
| |
Nat Rev Immunol,
6,
907-918.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Winter,
A.Henschel,
W.K.Kim,
and
M.Schroeder
(2006).
SCOPPI: a structural classification of protein-protein interfaces.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
34,
D310-D314.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Zhang,
M.Derider,
M.A.McCornack,
S.C.Jao,
N.Isern,
T.Ness,
R.Moyer,
and
P.J.LiWang
(2006).
Solution structure of the complex between poxvirus-encoded CC chemokine inhibitor vCCI and human MIP-1beta.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
13985-13990.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.G.Fallon,
and
A.Alcami
(2006).
Pathogen-derived immunomodulatory molecules: future immunotherapeutics?
|
| |
Trends Immunol,
27,
470-476.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.L.Arnold,
and
D.H.Fremont
(2006).
Structural determinants of chemokine binding by an Ectromelia virus-encoded decoy receptor.
|
| |
J Virol,
80,
7439-7449.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.G.Cyster
(2005).
Chemokines, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs.
|
| |
Annu Rev Immunol,
23,
127-159.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.K.Shah,
P.Aloy,
P.Bork,
and
R.B.Russell
(2005).
Structural similarity to bridge sequence space: finding new families on the bridges.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
14,
1305-1314.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.M.Handel,
Z.Johnson,
S.E.Crown,
E.K.Lau,
and
A.E.Proudfoot
(2005).
Regulation of protein function by glycosaminoglycans--as exemplified by chemokines.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem,
74,
385-410.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Johnson,
A.E.Proudfoot,
and
T.M.Handel
(2005).
Interaction of chemokines and glycosaminoglycans: a new twist in the regulation of chemokine function with opportunities for therapeutic intervention.
|
| |
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev,
16,
625-636.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Wang,
W.Bresnahan,
and
T.Shenk
(2004).
Human cytomegalovirus encodes a highly specific RANTES decoy receptor.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
101,
16642-16647.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Liu,
E.Dai,
L.Miller,
B.Seet,
A.Lalani,
C.Macauley,
X.Li,
H.W.Virgin,
C.Bunce,
P.Turner,
R.Moyer,
G.McFadden,
and
A.Lucas
(2004).
Viral chemokine-binding proteins inhibit inflammatory responses and aortic allograft transplant vasculopathy in rat models.
|
| |
Transplantation,
77,
1652-1660.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.G.Stevenson
(2004).
Immune evasion by gamma-herpesviruses.
|
| |
Curr Opin Immunol,
16,
456-462.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Pyo,
K.K.Jensen,
M.T.Wiekowski,
D.Manfra,
A.Alcami,
M.B.Taubman,
and
S.A.Lira
(2004).
Inhibition of intimal hyperplasia in transgenic mice conditionally expressing the chemokine-binding protein M3.
|
| |
Am J Pathol,
164,
2289-2297.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Cheek,
Y.Qi,
S.S.Krishna,
L.N.Kinch,
and
N.V.Grishin
(2004).
4SCOPmap: automated assignment of protein structures to evolutionary superfamilies.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
5,
197.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.R.Sarawar,
B.J.Lee,
and
F.Giannoni
(2004).
Cytokines and costimulatory molecules in the immune response to murine gammaherpesvirus-68.
|
| |
Viral Immunol,
17,
3.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Alcami
(2003).
Viral mimicry of cytokines, chemokines and their receptors.
|
| |
Nat Rev Immunol,
3,
36-50.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Alcami
(2003).
Structural basis of the herpesvirus M3-chemokine interaction.
|
| |
Trends Microbiol,
11,
191-192.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.J.McFarland,
and
R.K.Strong
(2003).
Thermodynamic analysis of degenerate recognition by the NKG2D immunoreceptor: not induced fit but rigid adaptation.
|
| |
Immunity,
19,
803-812.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.T.Seet,
C.A.McCaughan,
T.M.Handel,
A.Mercer,
C.Brunetti,
G.McFadden,
and
S.B.Fleming
(2003).
Analysis of an orf virus chemokine-binding protein: Shifting ligand specificities among a family of poxvirus viroceptors.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
100,
15137-15142.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.M.Webb,
I.Clark-Lewis,
and
A.Alcami
(2003).
The gammaherpesvirus chemokine binding protein binds to the N terminus of CXCL8.
|
| |
J Virol,
77,
8588-8592.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Diamond
(2003).
Evasion of innate and adaptive immunity by flaviviruses.
|
| |
Immunol Cell Biol,
81,
196-206.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |