 |
PDBsum entry 5lj3
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1922 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
882 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 5lj3
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 5707 86.1%*
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 868 13.1%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 31 0.5%
Disallowed regions [XX] 23 0.3%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 6629 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 204
Glycine residues 314
Proline residues 290
----
Total number of residues 7437
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.24
Chi1-chi2 distribution -0.58*
Chi1 only -0.09
Chi3 & chi4 0.40
Omega -0.27
-0.24
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.59
Main-chain bond angles 0.38
0.47
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.06
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
 |