|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
103:17208-17213
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of a heparin-dependent complex of Hedgehog and Ihog.
|
|
J.S.McLellan,
S.Yao,
X.Zheng,
B.V.Geisbrecht,
R.Ghirlando,
P.A.Beachy,
D.J.Leahy.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Hedgehog (Hh) signaling molecules mediate key tissue-patterning events during
animal development, and inappropriate activation of Hh signaling in adults has
been associated with human cancers. Recently, a conserved family of type I
integral membrane proteins required for normal response to the Hh signal was
discovered. One member of this family, Ihog (interference hedgehog), functions
upstream or at the level of Patched (Ptc), but how Ihog participates in Hh
signaling remains unclear. Here, we show that heparin binding induces Ihog
dimerization and is required to mediate high-affinity interactions between Ihog
and Hh. We also present crystal structures of a Hh-binding fragment of Ihog,
both alone and complexed with Hh. Heparin is not well ordered in these
structures, but a basic cleft in the first FNIII domain of Ihog (IhogFn1) is
shown by mutagenesis to mediate heparin binding. These results establish that Hh
directly binds Ihog and provide the first demonstration of a specific role for
heparin in Hh responsiveness.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. IhogFn1–2 adopts a horseshoe-like structure. (A)
Ribbon diagram of IhogFn1–2. IhogFn1 is colored green, and
IhogFn2 is colored light blue. A disordered loop is indicated by
the dashed line. (B) An electrostatic potential surface of
IhogFn1–2, shown in the same orientation as in A. The scale is
calibrated to –12 kT/e and +12 kT/e for red and blue,
respectively. Three sulfate ions are shown as orange and red
sticks. All structure images were generated with PyMOL
(http://pymol.sourceforge.net).
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. HhN binds to a cleft on IhogFn1. (A)
Semitransparent molecular surface of the HhN/IhogFn1–2 complex
superimposed on a ribbon diagram of the molecules. HhN is
colored yellow, IhogFn1 is green, and IhogFn2 is light blue. The
four residues that when mutated lead to loss of heparin binding
are colored dark blue. (B) Electrostatic potential surface of
the HhN/IhogFn1–2 complex, shown in the same orientation as in
A. The black dotted line marks the boundary between HhN and
IhogFn1–2. The four residues that when mutated lead to loss of
heparin binding are outlined with white dashes. The color scale
is calibrated to –12 kT/e and +12 kT/e for red and blue,
respectively. (C) HhN/IhogFn1–2 interface. The four Hh
residues mutated in the HhN/Ihog-interface 1 mutant are
represented as balls and sticks, as are nearby IhogFn1–2
residues. Bridging waters are represented by red spheres and
hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. (D) Effects of
HhN-interface mutations on HhN binding to Ihog-expressing
Drosophila cultured cells.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Gallet
(2011).
Hedgehog morphogen: from secretion to reception.
|
| |
Trends Cell Biol,
21,
238-246.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.H.Biersmith,
M.Hammel,
E.R.Geisbrecht,
and
S.Bouyain
(2011).
The Immunoglobulin-like Domains 1 and 2 of the Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase LAR Adopt an Unusual Horseshoe-like Conformation.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
408,
616-627.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Yang,
A.P.West,
and
P.J.Bjorkman
(2011).
Crystal structure of a hemojuvelin-binding fragment of neogenin at 1.8Å.
|
| |
J Struct Biol,
174,
239-244.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Keung,
S.Kumar,
and
D.V.Schaffer
(2010).
Presentation counts: microenvironmental regulation of stem cells by biophysical and material cues.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
26,
533-556.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Camp,
K.Currie,
A.Labbé,
D.J.van Meyel,
and
F.Charron
(2010).
Ihog and Boi are essential for Hedgehog signaling in Drosophila.
|
| |
Neural Dev,
5,
28.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.H.Williams,
W.N.Pappano,
A.M.Saunders,
M.S.Kim,
D.J.Leahy,
and
P.A.Beachy
(2010).
Dally-like core protein and its mammalian homologues mediate stimulatory and inhibitory effects on Hedgehog signal response.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
5869-5874.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.R.Maun,
D.Kirchhofer,
and
R.A.Lazarus
(2010).
Pseudo-active sites of protease domains: HGF/Met and Sonic hedgehog signaling in cancer.
|
| |
Biol Chem,
391,
881-892.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.A.Beachy,
S.G.Hymowitz,
R.A.Lazarus,
D.J.Leahy,
and
C.Siebold
(2010).
Interactions between Hedgehog proteins and their binding partners come into view.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
24,
2001-2012.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Zheng,
R.K.Mann,
N.Sever,
and
P.A.Beachy
(2010).
Genetic and biochemical definition of the Hedgehog receptor.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
24,
57-71.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Yan,
and
X.Lin
(2009).
Shaping morphogen gradients by proteoglycans.
|
| |
Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol,
1,
a002493.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Bosanac,
H.R.Maun,
S.J.Scales,
X.Wen,
A.Lingel,
J.F.Bazan,
F.J.de Sauvage,
S.G.Hymowitz,
and
R.A.Lazarus
(2009).
The structure of SHH in complex with HHIP reveals a recognition role for the Shh pseudo active site in signaling.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
691-697.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Bibliowicz,
and
J.M.Gross
(2009).
Expanded progenitor populations, vitreo-retinal abnormalities, and Müller glial reactivity in the zebrafish leprechaun/patched2 retina.
|
| |
BMC Dev Biol,
9,
52.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Cortes,
A.T.Baria,
and
N.B.Schwartz
(2009).
Sulfation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans is necessary for proper Indian hedgehog signaling in the developing growth plate.
|
| |
Development,
136,
1697-1706.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.S.McLellan,
X.Zheng,
G.Hauk,
R.Ghirlando,
P.A.Beachy,
and
D.J.Leahy
(2008).
The mode of Hedgehog binding to Ihog homologues is not conserved across different phyla.
|
| |
Nature,
455,
979-983.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Fukuhara,
J.A.Howitt,
S.A.Hussain,
and
E.Hohenester
(2008).
Structural and functional analysis of slit and heparin binding to immunoglobulin-like domains 1 and 2 of Drosophila Robo.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
16226-16234.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.R.Pallerla,
R.Lawrence,
L.Lewejohann,
Y.Pan,
T.Fischer,
U.Schlomann,
X.Zhang,
J.D.Esko,
and
K.Grobe
(2008).
Altered heparan sulfate structure in mice with deleted NDST3 gene function.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
16885-16894.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.R.Bürglin
(2008).
The Hedgehog protein family.
|
| |
Genome Biol,
9,
241.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Jacob,
and
L.Lum
(2007).
Deconstructing the hedgehog pathway in development and disease.
|
| |
Science,
318,
66-68.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Beenken,
and
M.Mohammadi
(2006).
Hedgehogs like it sweet, too.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
17069-17070.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |