spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2hvh

Go to PDB code: 
Top Page protein dna_rna ligands metals Protein-protein interface(s) links
Transferase/DNA PDB id
2hvh
Contents
Protein chains
580 a.a.
DNA/RNA
Ligands
GLC-FRU ×3
SO4 ×5
DCT ×2
Metals
_MN ×2
Waters ×278

References listed in PDB file
Key reference
Title The structural basis for the mutagenicity of o(6)-Methyl-Guanine lesions.
Authors J.J.Warren, L.J.Forsberg, L.S.Beese.
Ref. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006, 103, 19701-19706. [DOI no: 10.1073/pnas.0609580103]
PubMed id 17179038
Abstract
Methylating agents are widespread environmental carcinogens that generate a broad spectrum of DNA damage. Methylation at the guanine O(6) position confers the greatest mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. DNA polymerases insert cytosine and thymine with similar efficiency opposite O(6)-methyl-guanine (O6MeG). We combined pre-steady-state kinetic analysis and a series of nine x-ray crystal structures to contrast the reaction pathways of accurate and mutagenic replication of O6MeG in a high-fidelity DNA polymerase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. Polymerases achieve substrate specificity by selecting for nucleotides with shape and hydrogen-bonding patterns that complement a canonical DNA template. Our structures reveal that both thymine and cytosine O6MeG base pairs evade proofreading by mimicking the essential molecular features of canonical substrates. The steric mimicry depends on stabilization of a rare cytosine tautomer in C.O6MeG-polymerase complexes. An unusual electrostatic interaction between O-methyl protons and a thymine carbonyl oxygen helps stabilize T.O6MeG pairs bound to DNA polymerase. Because DNA methylators constitute an important class of chemotherapeutic agents, the molecular mechanisms of replication of these DNA lesions are important for our understanding of both the genesis and treatment of cancer.
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Structures of O6MeG·C (a) and O6MeG·T (b) pairs in DNA duplexes, unbound by protein. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. (a Left) O6MeG·C wobble pair from ref. 27. (a Right) Model of Watson–Crick O6MeG·protonated C pair from ref. 52. (b) O6MeG·T pairs from refs. 29 and 30. The presence or absence of the H bond indicated by the "?" has been the subject of some controversy (29, 30).
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. T·O6MeG (a) and C·O6MeG (b) conformations in the –2 base pair position. Mesh shows 1 2 F[o] – F[c] electron density for the base pairs.
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers

 

spacer

spacer