 |
PDBsum entry 1t5l
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA excision repair
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1t5l
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
DNA excision repair
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of the DNA repair protein uvrb point mutant y96a revealing a novel fold for domain 2
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Uvrabc system protein b. Chain: a, b. Synonym: uvrb protein, excinuclease abc subunit b. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Bacillus caldotenax. Organism_taxid: 1395. Gene: uvrb. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.60Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.233
|
R-free:
|
0.287
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
J.J.Truglio,D.L.Croteau,M.Skorvaga,M.J.Dellavecchia,K.Theis, B.S.Mandavilli,B.Van Houten,C.Kisker
|
Key ref:
|
 |
J.J.Truglio
et al.
(2004).
Interactions between UvrA and UvrB: the role of UvrB's domain 2 in nucleotide excision repair.
EMBO J,
23,
2498-2509.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
04-May-04
|
Release date:
|
22-Jun-04
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P56981
(UVRB_BACCA) -
UvrABC system protein B from Bacillus caldotenax
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
658 a.a.
595 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 3 residue positions (black
crosses)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
EMBO J
23:2498-2509
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Interactions between UvrA and UvrB: the role of UvrB's domain 2 in nucleotide excision repair.
|
|
J.J.Truglio,
D.L.Croteau,
M.Skorvaga,
M.J.DellaVecchia,
K.Theis,
B.S.Mandavilli,
B.Van Houten,
C.Kisker.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism
present in all kingdoms of life. UvrB is a central component of the bacterial
NER system, participating in damage recognition, strand excision and repair
synthesis. None of the three presently available crystal structures of UvrB has
defined the structure of domain 2, which is critical for the interaction with
UvrA. We have solved the crystal structure of the UvrB Y96A variant, which
reveals a new fold for domain 2 and identifies highly conserved residues located
on its surface. These residues are restricted to the face of UvrB important for
DNA binding and may be critical for the interaction of UvrB with UvrA. We have
mutated these residues to study their role in the incision reaction, formation
of the pre-incision complex, destabilization of short duplex regions in DNA,
binding to UvrA and ATP hydrolysis. Based on the structural and biochemical
data, we conclude that domain 2 is required for a productive UvrA-UvrB
interaction, which is a pre-requisite for all subsequent steps in nucleotide
excision repair.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1 Three-dimensional structure of the UvrA-interacting
domain (domain 2) of UvrB. The ribbon diagram shows the
secondary structure elements and mutated residues on the
proposed UvrA interacting face. The core sheet
( 2
- 7)
is shown in green, a second sheet in blue ( 1,
8)
and the single helix
in pink. Blue spheres as well as residue labels mark the
beginning and end of domain 2.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3 Comparison of the Y96A UvrB structure to WT UvrB. (A)
Stereo view of the interface between domain 2 and the remainder
of the UvrB molecule. Selected side chains are shown and
labeled. Color coding is according to domain architecture as in
Figure 2A and domain 2 in blue. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges
are indicated by red dotted lines. (B) Comparison of the overall
structure of WT UvrB (cyan) and the two NCS-related copies of
UvrB Y96A (yellow and red) as a stereo view. Orientation is
chosen as in Figure 2. For the superposition, domain 1a of each
of the structures was used and the resulting transformations
were applied to the entire molecule. (C) Superposition of UvrB
Y96A (color coded as in Figure 2) and WT UvrB (gray). Side
chains for Tyr 92, Asp 117 and Arg 190 are shown for both the WT
and the UvrB Y96A structure. The side chain of Y96 is omitted
from the native model since the electron density for this
residue is insufficient. A sphere indicates the position of the
C atom
of Y96 (A96 for the mutant).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
EMBO J
(2004,
23,
2498-2509)
copyright 2004.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
D.Pakotiprapha,
M.Samuels,
K.Shen,
J.H.Hu,
and
D.Jeruzalmi
(2012).
Structure and mechanism of the UvrA-UvrB DNA damage sensor.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
19,
291-298.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Huang,
I.D.Kozekov,
A.Kozekova,
C.J.Rizzo,
A.K.McCullough,
R.S.Lloyd,
and
M.P.Stone
(2010).
Minor groove orientation of the KWKK peptide tethered via the N-terminal amine to the acrolein-derived 1,N2-gamma-hydroxypropanodeoxyguanosine lesion with a trimethylene linkage.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
49,
6155-6164.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Manelyte,
Y.I.Kim,
A.J.Smith,
R.M.Smith,
and
N.J.Savery
(2010).
Regulation and rate enhancement during transcription-coupled DNA repair.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
40,
714-724.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Peng,
A.K.Ghosh,
B.Van Houten,
and
M.M.Greenberg
(2010).
Nucleotide excision repair of a DNA interstrand cross-link produces single- and double-strand breaks.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
49,
11-19.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Pakotiprapha,
Y.Liu,
G.L.Verdine,
and
D.Jeruzalmi
(2009).
A Structural Model for the Damage-sensing Complex in Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
12837-12844.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Manelyte,
C.P.Guy,
R.M.Smith,
M.S.Dillingham,
P.McGlynn,
and
N.J.Savery
(2009).
The unstructured C-terminal extension of UvrD interacts with UvrB, but is dispensable for nucleotide excision repair.
|
| |
DNA Repair (Amst),
8,
1300-1310.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.N.Murphy,
P.Gong,
K.Ralto,
L.Manelyte,
N.J.Savery,
and
K.Theis
(2009).
An N-terminal clamp restrains the motor domains of the bacterial transcription-repair coupling factor Mfd.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
37,
6042-6053.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Pruteanu,
and
T.A.Baker
(2009).
Controlled degradation by ClpXP protease tunes the levels of the excision repair protein UvrA to the extent of DNA damage.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
71,
912-924.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.T.Sung,
Y.T.Lai,
C.Y.Huang,
L.Y.Chou,
H.W.Shih,
W.C.Cheng,
C.H.Wong,
and
C.Ma
(2009).
Crystal structure of the membrane-bound bifunctional transglycosylase PBP1b from Escherichia coli.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
8824-8829.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Nakano,
A.Katafuchi,
M.Matsubara,
H.Terato,
T.Tsuboi,
T.Masuda,
T.Tatsumoto,
S.P.Pack,
K.Makino,
D.L.Croteau,
B.Van Houten,
K.Iijima,
H.Tauchi,
and
H.Ide
(2009).
Homologous recombination but not nucleotide excision repair plays a pivotal role in tolerance of DNA-protein cross-links in mammalian cells.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
27065-27076.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.L.Croteau,
M.J.DellaVecchia,
L.Perera,
and
B.Van Houten
(2008).
Cooperative damage recognition by UvrA and UvrB: identification of UvrA residues that mediate DNA binding.
|
| |
DNA Repair (Amst),
7,
392-404.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Pakotiprapha,
Y.Inuzuka,
B.R.Bowman,
G.F.Moolenaar,
N.Goosen,
D.Jeruzalmi,
and
G.L.Verdine
(2008).
Crystal structure of Bacillus stearothermophilus UvrA provides insight into ATP-modulated dimerization, UvrB interaction, and DNA binding.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
29,
122-133.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.A.Christensen,
H.Wang,
B.Van Houten,
and
K.M.Vasquez
(2008).
Efficient processing of TFO-directed psoralen DNA interstrand crosslinks by the UvrABC nuclease.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
36,
7136-7145.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.M.Deaconescu,
N.Savery,
and
S.A.Darst
(2007).
The bacterial transcription repair coupling factor.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
17,
96.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.DellaVecchia,
W.K.Merritt,
Y.Peng,
T.W.Kirby,
E.F.DeRose,
G.A.Mueller,
B.Van Houten,
and
R.E.London
(2007).
NMR analysis of [methyl-13C]methionine UvrB from Bacillus caldotenax reveals UvrB-domain 4 heterodimer formation in solution.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
373,
282-295.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.J.Savery
(2007).
The molecular mechanism of transcription-coupled DNA repair.
|
| |
Trends Microbiol,
15,
326-333.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.M.Deaconescu,
A.L.Chambers,
A.J.Smith,
B.E.Nickels,
A.Hochschild,
N.J.Savery,
and
S.A.Darst
(2006).
Structural basis for bacterial transcription-coupled DNA repair.
|
| |
Cell,
124,
507-520.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.L.Croteau,
M.J.DellaVecchia,
H.Wang,
R.J.Bienstock,
M.A.Melton,
and
B.Van Houten
(2006).
The C-terminal zinc finger of UvrA does not bind DNA directly but regulates damage-specific DNA binding.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
26370-26381.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Wang,
M.J.DellaVecchia,
M.Skorvaga,
D.L.Croteau,
D.A.Erie,
and
B.Van Houten
(2006).
UvrB domain 4, an autoinhibitory gate for regulation of DNA binding and ATPase activity.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
15227-15237.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.J.Truglio,
E.Karakas,
B.Rhau,
H.Wang,
M.J.DellaVecchia,
B.Van Houten,
and
C.Kisker
(2006).
Structural basis for DNA recognition and processing by UvrB.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
360-364.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.DellaVecchia,
D.L.Croteau,
M.Skorvaga,
S.V.Dezhurov,
O.I.Lavrik,
and
B.Van Houten
(2004).
Analyzing the handoff of DNA from UvrA to UvrB utilizing DNA-protein photoaffinity labeling.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
45245-45256.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Skorvaga,
M.J.DellaVecchia,
D.L.Croteau,
K.Theis,
J.J.Truglio,
B.S.Mandavilli,
C.Kisker,
and
B.Van Houten
(2004).
Identification of residues within UvrB that are important for efficient DNA binding and damage processing.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
51574-51580.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |