 |
PDBsum entry 1owr
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1owr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structure of nfat bound to DNA as a monomer.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.C.Stroud,
L.Chen.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2003,
334,
1009-1022.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) is a calcium-dependent
transcription factor that cooperates with a myriad of partner transcription
factors to regulate distinct transcription programs. Transcription activation by
NFAT without the cooperation of co-stimulatory signals in lymphocytes can also
impose a genetic program of anergy. Although the ternary NFAT1/Fos-Jun/DNA
complex has been structurally characterized, how NFAT1 recognizes DNA in the
absence of cooperative partners and how such a binary NFAT/DNA complex may lead
to the assembly of distinct high-order NFAT transcription complexes are still
poorly understood. We have determined the crystal structure of the entire Rel
homology region (RHR) of human NFAT1 (NFATc2) bound to DNA as a monomer. We also
present footprinting evidence that corroborates the protein-DNA contacts
observed in the crystal structure. Our structural and biochemical studies reveal
the mechanism by which the monomeric Rel protein NFAT recognizes its cognate DNA
site. A remarkable feature of the binary NFAT/DNA complex is the conformational
flexibility exhibited by NFAT1 in the four independent copies of the NFAT/DNA
complex in the crystal structure, which may reflect a mechanism by which NFAT1
interacts with a variety of protein partners as it mediates disparate biological
responses.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Interactions between the RHR-N and RHR-C in
Complexes 1 and 2. (a) Comparison of Complexes 1 and 2 with the
NFAT/Fos-Jun/DNA ternary complex. All complexes have been
oriented for comparison looking down the DNA axis with the RHR-C
projecting to the left. Fos is colored red and Jun is colored
blue. (b) Detailed view of the D464-R541-Q669 triad from
Complexes 1 and 2 and the ternary complex. This triad is
representative of the malleability seen in the RHR-N/RHR-C
interface. Orientations are similar to (a) except for some minor
changes for clarity.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. EMSA and footprinting of the binary and ternary
complexes in solution. (a) Titration of full-length NFAT RHR and
the NFAT RHR-N with the DNA used for crystallographic analysis.
Left panel, binding curve of full-length NFAT RHR binding to the
DNA fragment (K[d]=2.7(±0.4) nM, see Methods). Center
panel, EMSA gel of full-length NFAT RHR binding to the DNA
fragment. Right panel, EMSA gel of the NFAT RHR-N binding to the
DNA fragment. (b) Methylation interference footprinting of NFAT1
and NFAT1/Fos-Jun binding to ARRE2. F, free (unbound) DNA; L,
lower complex containing NFAT1 alone; U, upper complex
containing NFAT1 and Fos-Jun. Lanes 1-3, coding strand; 4-6,
non-coding strand. Fiducial lines connect certain residues to
their corresponding bands for clarity. (c) Ethyl nitroso-urea
(ENU) ethylation interference footprinting of NFAT1 and
NFAT1/Fos-Jun binding to ARRE2. F, free (unbound) DNA; L, lower
complex containing NFAT1 alone; U, upper complex containing
NFAT1 and Fos-Jun; G, (lanes 1 and 11) Maxam-Gilbert G lane;
lanes 2-4, coding strand using the full-length NFAT RHR; lanes
5-7, non-coding strand using only the NFAT RHR-N; lanes 8-10,
non-coding strand using the full-length NFAT RHR. Fiducial lines
connect certain residues to their corresponding bands for
clarity. On the right of the gel is a histogram showing
quantitative analysis of the footprints on the non-coding strand
for the NFAT1 RHR/DNA complex (open) and NFAT1 RHR/Fos-Jun/DNA
complex (shaded). Values are expressed as fractions of the
intensity at the same positions in the free probe after
normalization for loading.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2003,
334,
1009-1022)
copyright 2003.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |