 |
PDBsum entry 1v06
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1v06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
13:743-753
(2005)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The AXH domain adopts alternative folds the solution structure of HBP1 AXH.
|
|
C.de Chiara,
R.P.Menon,
S.Adinolfi,
J.de Boer,
E.Ktistaki,
G.Kelly,
L.Calder,
D.Kioussis,
A.Pastore.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
AXH is a protein module identified in two unrelated families that comprise the
transcriptional repressor HBP1 and ataxin-1 (ATX1), the protein responsible for
spinocerebellar ataxia type-1 (SCA1). SCA1 is a neurodegenerative disorder
associated with protein misfolding and formation of toxic intranuclear
aggregates. We have solved the structure in solution of monomeric AXH from HBP1.
The domain adopts a nonclassical permutation of an OB fold and binds nucleic
acids, a function previously unidentified for this region of HBP1. Comparison of
HBP1 AXH with the crystal structure of dimeric ATX1 AXH indicates that, despite
the significant sequence homology, the two proteins have different topologies,
suggesting that AXH has chameleon properties. We further demonstrate that HBP1
AXH remains monomeric, whereas the ATX1 dimer spontaneously aggregates and forms
fibers. Our results describe an entirely novel, to our knowledge, example of a
chameleon fold and suggest a link between these properties and the SCA1
pathogenesis.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Comparison between the AXH Domains of ATX1 and HBP1
(A) Structure of the dimer of dimers of ATX1 as observed in
the crystal structure (PDB identifier 1oa8). The subunits
(A–D from left to right) are alternatively indicated with
dark and light tones of green. Red circles indicate the
intermolecular interfaces between each monomer in the dimer and
between the two asymmetric dimers. They include the N terminus
and helix α[1], respectively. (B) Structures of subunits
A and B of the AXH from ATX1. (C) Structure of HBP1_AXH
(left) and superposition of the A subunit of ATX1 AXH and
HBP1_AXH (right). Only the structurally similar regions are
displayed. The positions of the N and C termini and of the
secondary structure elements are indicated. Figure 2.
Comparison between the AXH Domains of ATX1 and HBP1(A) Structure
of the dimer of dimers of ATX1 as observed in the crystal
structure (PDB identifier 1oa8). The subunits (A–D from left
to right) are alternatively indicated with dark and light tones
of green. Red circles indicate the intermolecular interfaces
between each monomer in the dimer and between the two asymmetric
dimers. They include the N terminus and helix α[1],
respectively.(B) Structures of subunits A and B of the AXH from
ATX1.(C) Structure of HBP1_AXH (left) and superposition of the A
subunit of ATX1 AXH and HBP1_AXH (right). Only the structurally
similar regions are displayed. The positions of the N and C
termini and of the secondary structure elements are indicated.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Tendency of ATX1_AXH to Aggregate (A) Elution
profiles of analytical gel filtration experiments performed on a
freshly purified ATX1_AXH sample (100 μM protein concentration
in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20 mM NaCl, 2 mM
β-mercaptoethanol). The protein was incubated at 22°C and
was injected in the column immediately after concentration
(continuous line) after 24 hr (dashed line), 3 days (dotted
line), and 4 days (dotted and dashed line). (B) EM
micrograph of a sample of ATX1_AXH treated as in (A) but
incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. (C) For comparison, EM
micrograph of an HBP1_AXH treated as in (B). The bar corresponds
to 50 nm. Figure 6. Tendency of ATX1_AXH to Aggregate(A)
Elution profiles of analytical gel filtration experiments
performed on a freshly purified ATX1_AXH sample (100 μM protein
concentration in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20 mM NaCl, 2 mM
β-mercaptoethanol). The protein was incubated at 22°C and
was injected in the column immediately after concentration
(continuous line) after 24 hr (dashed line), 3 days (dotted
line), and 4 days (dotted and dashed line).(B) EM micrograph of
a sample of ATX1_AXH treated as in (A) but incubated at 37°C
for 24 hr.(C) For comparison, EM micrograph of an HBP1_AXH
treated as in (B). The bar corresponds to 50 nm.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(2005,
13,
743-753)
copyright 2005.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Robertson,
S.J.Headey,
H.M.Saunders,
H.Ecroyd,
M.J.Scanlon,
J.A.Carver,
and
S.P.Bottomley
(2010).
Small heat-shock proteins interact with a flanking domain to suppress polyglutamine aggregation.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
10424-10429.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Zen,
C.de Chiara,
A.Pastore,
and
C.Micheletti
(2009).
Using dynamics-based comparisons to predict nucleic acid binding sites in proteins: an application to OB-fold domains.
|
| |
Bioinformatics,
25,
1876-1883.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Micheletti,
and
H.Orland
(2009).
MISTRAL: a tool for energy-based multiple structural alignment of proteins.
|
| |
Bioinformatics,
25,
2663-2669.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.M.Saunders,
and
S.P.Bottomley
(2009).
Multi-domain misfolding: understanding the aggregation pathway of polyglutamine proteins.
|
| |
Protein Eng Des Sel,
22,
447-451.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Díaz-Moreno,
D.Hollingworth,
T.A.Frenkiel,
G.Kelly,
S.Martin,
S.Howell,
M.García-Mayoral,
R.Gherzi,
P.Briata,
and
A.Ramos
(2009).
Phosphorylation-mediated unfolding of a KH domain regulates KSRP localization via 14-3-3 binding.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
238-246.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Matilla-Dueñas,
R.Goold,
and
P.Giunti
(2008).
Clinical, genetic, molecular, and pathophysiological insights into spinocerebellar ataxia type 1.
|
| |
Cerebellum,
7,
106-114.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.A.Belogurov,
M.N.Vassylyeva,
V.Svetlov,
S.Klyuyev,
N.V.Grishin,
D.G.Vassylyev,
and
I.Artsimovitch
(2007).
Structural basis for converting a general transcription factor into an operon-specific virulence regulator.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
26,
117-129.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.F.García-Mayoral,
D.Hollingworth,
L.Masino,
I.Díaz-Moreno,
G.Kelly,
R.Gherzi,
C.F.Chou,
C.Y.Chen,
and
A.Ramos
(2007).
The structure of the C-terminal KH domains of KSRP reveals a noncanonical motif important for mRNA degradation.
|
| |
Structure,
15,
485-498.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Meier,
and
S.Ozbek
(2007).
A biological cosmos of parallel universes: does protein structural plasticity facilitate evolution?
|
| |
Bioessays,
29,
1095-1104.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.O.Yeates
(2007).
Protein structure: evolutionary bridges to new folds.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
17,
R48-R50.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Andreeva,
and
A.G.Murzin
(2006).
Evolution of protein fold in the presence of functional constraints.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
16,
399-408.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |