Reproducibility and transparency

Reproducibility and transparency in biology and medical sciences have been a hot topic since the early 2010s (Figure 9), with the beginning of what researchers call the “reproducibility crisis”. According to a survey conducted in 2016 by Nature on a pool of 1,576 scientists, in around 70% of the cases an attempt was made to reproduce someone else’s experiment, it was unsuccessful. By ‘reproducing’, we mean both in a ‘mechanical’ sense (e.g. starting from a given raw data file, following an exact set of analysis procedures to obtain an identical processed data file) and in a ‘biological’ sense (e.g. replicating the conclusion of a study by sourcing comparable samples and following similar wet-/dry-lab protocols).

Screenshots of recent articles on reproducibility in scientific research
Figure 10 Examples of articles addressing the reproducibility crisis.

Some steps that you can take to ensure the reproducibility and transparency of your experiment are:

  • ensure that the design of your experiment includes appropriate controls and replicates
  • use appropriate statistical tests and seek advice where necessary
  • keep back-up copies of your raw data (request them from the core facility if needed)
  • document all procedures and parameters (‘Materials and Methods’) with as much detail as possible
  • submit your (well annotated) experiment to a public database for functional genomics experiments such as ArrayExpress or GEO

For more on ensuring reproducibility, review the page ‘Is it FAIR?’ in our online tutorial on data management.