 |
PDBsum entry 9fd2
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
9fd2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1409 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1130 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 9fd2
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 4791 87.2%*
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 697 12.7%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 7 0.1%
Disallowed regions [XX] 2 0.0%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 5497 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 74
Glycine residues 382
Proline residues 279
----
Total number of residues 6232
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.21
Chi1-chi2 distribution -0.80*
Chi1 only -0.29
Chi3 & chi4 0.38
Omega -0.14
-0.23
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.67
Main-chain bond angles 0.49
0.57
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.08
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
 |