 |
PDBsum entry 8s55
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
8s55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1417 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1130 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 8s55
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 3461 86.5%*
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 528 13.2%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 7 0.2%
Disallowed regions [XX] 5 0.1%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 4001 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 46
Glycine residues 258
Proline residues 209
----
Total number of residues 4514
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.16
Chi1-chi2 distribution -0.35
Chi1 only -0.05
Chi3 & chi4 0.45
Omega -0.18
-0.12
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.67
Main-chain bond angles 0.46
0.55
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.14
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
 |