 |
PDBsum entry 7o4l
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
7o4l
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 7o4l
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 3544 91.8%
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 315 8.2%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 0 0.0%
Disallowed regions [XX] 1 0.0%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 3860 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 94
Glycine residues 190
Proline residues 186
----
Total number of residues 4330
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution 0.14
Chi1-chi2 distribution -0.14
Chi1 only -0.02
Chi3 & chi4 0.43
Omega 0.15
0.11
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.67
Main-chain bond angles 0.51
0.58
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.30
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
 |