 |
PDBsum entry 5mmj
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 5mmj
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 2434 92.8%
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 172 6.6%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 14 0.5%
Disallowed regions [XX] 3 0.1%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 2623 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 44
Glycine residues 197
Proline residues 116
----
Total number of residues 2980
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.23
Chi1-chi2 distribution -0.35
Chi1 only -0.09
Chi3 & chi4 0.61
Omega -0.63*
-0.24
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.55
Main-chain bond angles 0.42
0.47
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.05
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
 |