 |
PDBsum entry 3in2
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electron transport
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3in2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Rationally tuning the reduction potential of a single cupredoxin beyond the natural range.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
N.M.Marshall,
D.K.Garner,
T.D.Wilson,
Y.G.Gao,
H.Robinson,
M.J.Nilges,
Y.Lu.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nature, 2009,
462,
113-116.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Redox processes are at the heart of numerous functions in chemistry and biology,
from long-range electron transfer in photosynthesis and respiration to catalysis
in industrial and fuel cell research. These functions are accomplished in nature
by only a limited number of redox-active agents. A long-standing issue in these
fields is how redox potentials are fine-tuned over a broad range with little
change to the redox-active site or electron-transfer properties. Resolving this
issue will not only advance our fundamental understanding of the roles of
long-range, non-covalent interactions in redox processes, but also allow for
design of redox-active proteins having tailor-made redox potentials for
applications such as artificial photosynthetic centres or fuel cell catalysts
for energy conversion. Here we show that two important secondary coordination
sphere interactions, hydrophobicity and hydrogen-bonding, are capable of tuning
the reduction potential of the cupredoxin azurin over a 700 mV range, surpassing
the highest and lowest reduction potentials reported for any mononuclear
cupredoxin, without perturbing the metal binding site beyond what is typical for
the cupredoxin family of proteins. We also demonstrate that the effects of
individual structural features are additive and that redox potential tuning of
azurin is now predictable across the full range of cupredoxin potentials.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1: X-ray structures of Az and selected variants. a,
Native azurin (PDB 4AZU). b, N47S/M121L azurin: N47S affects the
rigidity of the copper binding site and, probably, the direct
hydrogen bonds between the protein backbone and Cys 112. c,
N47S/F114N azurin: introducing a hydrogen-bond donor at position
114 perturbs hydrogen-bonding near the copper binding site,
possibly disrupting donor–acceptor interactions to His 117, or
ionic interactions between the copper and the carbonyl oxygen of
Gly 45. d, F114P/M121Q azurin: F114P deletes a direct hydrogen
bond to Cys 112 resulting in a lower redox potential. The
ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy of the F114P-containing
variants shows a significant increase in the copper d arrow
d absorbance range around 800 nm. This increased absorbance
suggests slight rearrangement of the copper binding site, but is
consistent with F114P Az^27 and other T1 copper proteins, such
as plastocyanin^9. In all panels copper is shown in green,
carbon in cyan, nitrogen in blue, oxygen in red and sulphur in
yellow. Hydrogen-bonding interactions are shown by dashed red
lines.
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2: Rational tuning of the reduction potential of Az.
a, Plot of E^o at pH 7.0 versus log P for the Az mutants from
this study (here P is the partition coefficient of the side
chain of the residue between octanol and water; that is, it is a
measure of hydrophobicity). The lowest reported E^o (dashed
orange line) at pH 7.0 for any T1 cupredoxin before this study,
M86Q pseudoazurin, is indicated. The highest E^o (dashed purple
line) at pH 6.2 of any T1 cupredoxin variant before this study,
M148L Rc, is also indicated; its potential was not measured at
pH 7.0 owing to protein instability. Considering the pH trend of
the E^o of all cupredoxins, this reported value for M148L Rc
would be lower at pH 7.0. b, Plot showing the E^o value for each
azurin variant at pH 7.0 unless otherwise noted. Not only is the
redox potential of Az tunable to the extremes of the redox
potentials attainable by T1 cupredoxins, but to nearly any redox
potential within the range. Error bars, 1
s.d.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature
(2009,
462,
113-116)
copyright 2009.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |