 |
PDBsum entry 3ew2
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unknown function
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3ew2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Unknown function
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of rhizavidin-biotin complex
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Rhizavidin. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Rhizobium etli. Organism_taxid: 347834. Strain: cfn 42. Gene: rhe_pd00032. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.30Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.218
|
R-free:
|
0.304
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
O.Livnah,A.Meir
|
Key ref:
|
 |
A.Meir
et al.
(2009).
Crystal structure of rhizavidin: insights into the enigmatic high-affinity interaction of an innate biotin-binding protein dimer.
J Mol Biol,
386,
379-390.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
14-Oct-08
|
Release date:
|
23-Dec-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q8KKW2
(Q8KKW2_RHIEC) -
Hypothetical conserved protein from Rhizobium etli (strain ATCC 51251 / DSM 11541 / JCM 21823 / NBRC 15573 / CFN 42)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
155 a.a.
114 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
386:379-390
(2009)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structure of rhizavidin: insights into the enigmatic high-affinity interaction of an innate biotin-binding protein dimer.
|
|
A.Meir,
S.H.Helppolainen,
E.Podoly,
H.R.Nordlund,
V.P.Hytönen,
J.A.Määttä,
M.Wilchek,
E.A.Bayer,
M.S.Kulomaa,
O.Livnah.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Rhizavidin, from the proteobacterium Rhizobium etli, exhibits high affinity
towards biotin but maintains an inherent dimeric quaternary structure and thus,
differs from all other known tetrameric avidins. Rhizavidin also differs from
the other avidins, since it lacks the characteristic tryptophan residue
positioned in the L7,8 loop that plays a crucial role in high-affinity binding
and oligomeric stability of the tetrameric avidins. The question is, therefore,
how does the dimer exist and how is the high biotin-binding affinity retained?
For this purpose, the crystal structures of apo- and biotin-complexed rhizavidin
were determined. The structures reveal that the rhizavidin monomer exhibits a
topology similar to those of other members of the avidin family, that is, eight
antiparallel beta-strands that form the conventional avidin beta-barrel. The
quaternary structure comprises the sandwich-like dimer, in which the extensive
1-4 intermonomer interface is intact, but the 1-2 and 1-3 interfaces are
nonexistent. Consequently, the biotin-binding site is partially accessible, due
to the lack of the tryptophan "lid" that distinguishes the tetrameric
structures. In rhizavidin, a disulfide bridge connecting the L3,4 and L5,6 loops
restrains the L3,4 loop conformation, leaving the binding-site residues
essentially unchanged upon biotin binding. Our study suggests that in addition
to the characteristic hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, the
preformed architecture of the binding site and consequent shape complementarity
play a decisive role in the high-affinity biotin binding of rhizavidin. The
structural description of a novel dimeric avidin-like molecule will greatly
contribute to the design of improved and unique avidin derivatives for
diversifying the capabilities of avidin-biotin technology.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Schematic ribbon presentation of the rhizavidin
dimer. The monomers are labeled and shown in cyan and magenta,
respectively, and the biotin molecules in the binding sites are
shown in black. The disulfide bridges are shown in stick
presentation and marked by arrows. In the rhizavidin dimer, the
binding sites and the corresponding biotin carboxylates are
located at opposite positions (approximately 180° rotation).
|
 |
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. Biotin binding-site residues of the avidins. (a)
Schematic representation of the hydrogen-bonding network in the
rhizavidin, avidin, AVR4, and streptavidin complexes with
biotin. In all four proteins, the biotin ring system forms an
identical network of H-bond interactions. In all avidins, the
L3,4 loop contributes a single H-bond interaction with one of
the biotin ureido nitrogens. In rhizavidin, streptavidin, and
AVR4, each of the biotin carboxylate oxygens forms a single
H-bond interaction with residues at similar positions on the
proteins. In this context, rhizavidin Gly49 from the L3,4 loop
is positioned next to Cys50, which forms a disulfide bridge and
contributes to the stability of the region upon biotin binding.
In avidin, however, the biotin carboxylate oxygens form a more
complex set of H-bonding interactions. (b) Aromatic residues
involved in biotin binding in rhizavidin (middle), avidin
(left), and streptavidin (right). The network of aromatic
residues in avidin is identical with that in AVR4, which was
thus not included. The additional Trp residue from an adjacent
monomer is shown in magenta for avidin and streptavidin, and its
absence is apparent in rhizavidin. The disulfide bridge in
rhizavidin between Cys50 and Cys79 (shown in red) does not
appear in other avidin structures but is located in an
equivalent position as Phe72 of avidin and Phe70 of AVR4 (not
shown). Streptavidin (right) lacks such an aromatic residue.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2009,
386,
379-390)
copyright 2009.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.E.Chivers,
A.L.Koner,
E.D.Lowe,
and
M.Howarth
(2011).
How the biotin-streptavidin interaction was made even stronger: investigation via crystallography and a chimaeric tetramer.
|
| |
Biochem J,
435,
55-63.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |
| |