 |
PDBsum entry 3dc4
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motor protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3dc4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Cell
136:110-122
(2009)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ATPase cycle of the nonmotile kinesin NOD allows microtubule end tracking and drives chromosome movement.
|
|
J.C.Cochran,
C.V.Sindelar,
N.K.Mulko,
K.A.Collins,
S.E.Kong,
R.S.Hawley,
F.J.Kull.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Segregation of nonexchange chromosomes during Drosophila melanogaster meiosis
requires the proper function of NOD, a nonmotile kinesin-10. We have determined
the X-ray crystal structure of the NOD catalytic domain in the ADP- and
AMPPNP-bound states. These structures reveal an alternate conformation of the
microtubule binding region as well as a nucleotide-sensitive relay of hydrogen
bonds at the active site. Additionally, a cryo-electron microscopy
reconstruction of the nucleotide-free microtubule-NOD complex shows an atypical
binding orientation. Thermodynamic studies show that NOD binds tightly to
microtubules in the nucleotide-free state, yet other nucleotide states,
including AMPPNP, are weakened. Our pre-steady-state kinetic analysis
demonstrates that NOD interaction with microtubules occurs slowly with weak
activation of ADP product release. Upon rapid substrate binding, NOD detaches
from the microtubule prior to the rate-limiting step of ATP hydrolysis, which is
also atypical for a kinesin. We propose a model for NOD's microtubule plus-end
tracking that drives chromosome movement.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. X-Ray Crystal Structure of NOD•ADP and
NOD•AMPPNP (A) Structure of NOD•ADP is shown. ADP is
displayed as a ball-and-stick model. (B) NOD•AMPPNP is
shown as in (A). (C and D) Superposition of NOD•ADP
(blue) and NOD•AMPPNP (orange) through alignment of the P loop
(G87-S94) as viewed from the top (C) and from the side (D).
Arrows highlight the differences between the two states in Sw1,
Sw2, α3, and L11. (E) Configuration of hydrogen bonds
between Sw1/Sw2 residues in NOD•ADP. Hydrogen bonds with
measured distances are highlighted with magenta dashed lines.
The water molecules that coordinate Mg^2+ are shown as red
spheres. (F) Active site configuration of hydrogen bonds
for NOD•AMPPNP in a similar orientation as (E).
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. L5 and MT Binding Region in NOD Show Unique
Conformation Compared to Other Kinesins (A) Comparison of
L5 in different kinesin families (gray) after P loop
superposition. The N-terminal half of L5 in NOD (blue) packs
against α3. (B) Detailed view of L5 in NOD (blue) compared
to L5 in kinesin-5 (orange) bound to monastrol (Mon). The pocket
formed by P101 and P102 on L5 and L180, H181, and L184 on α3 is
shown. (C) NOD•ADP (blue) was superposed with KHC•ADP
(gold) and oriented to show the β5-L8 lobe. (D–F) NOD's
“Sw2 cluster” (blue) is compared to the “ADP-like”
conformation in kinesin-1 ([D], 1bg2, magenta), the
“ATP-like” conformation in kinesin-1 ([E], 1mkj, gold), and
KIF2C ([F], 1v8j, red). View is from the MT binding surface.
Clockwise rotation of NOD's α4 relative to kinesin-1's α4 is
highlighted in (D) and (E).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Cell Press:
Cell
(2009,
136,
110-122)
copyright 2009.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.C.Cochran,
Y.C.Zhao,
D.E.Wilcox,
and
F.J.Kull
(2012).
A metal switch for controlling the activity of molecular motor proteins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
19,
122-127.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.J.Tsai,
and
R.Nussinov
(2011).
A unified convention for biological assemblies with helical symmetry.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
67,
716-728.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Jiang,
and
A.Akhmanova
(2011).
Microtubule tip-interacting proteins: a view from both ends.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
23,
94.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Naber,
A.Larson,
S.Rice,
R.Cooke,
and
E.Pate
(2011).
Multiple conformations of the nucleotide site of Kinesin family motors in the triphosphate state.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
408,
628-642.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.L.Parke,
E.J.Wojcik,
S.Kim,
and
D.K.Worthylake
(2010).
ATP hydrolysis in Eg5 kinesin involves a catalytic two-water mechanism.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
5859-5867.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Civelekoglu-Scholey,
and
J.M.Scholey
(2010).
Mitotic force generators and chromosome segregation.
|
| |
Cell Mol Life Sci,
67,
2231-2250.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Wordeman
(2010).
How kinesin motor proteins drive mitotic spindle function: Lessons from molecular assays.
|
| |
Semin Cell Dev Biol,
21,
260-268.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Hirokawa,
R.Nitta,
and
Y.Okada
(2009).
The mechanisms of kinesin motor motility: lessons from the monomeric motor KIF1A.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
10,
877-884.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |