spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 3d25

Go to PDB code: 
Top Page protein ligands Protein-protein interface(s) links
Immune system PDB id
3d25
Contents
Protein chains
274 a.a.
98 a.a.
Ligands
VAL-LEU-HIS-ASP-
ASP-LEU-LEU-GLU-
ALA
Waters ×354

References listed in PDB file
Key reference
Title Secondary anchor polymorphism in the ha-1 minor histocompatibility antigen critically affects mhc stability and tcr recognition.
Authors S.Nicholls, K.P.Piper, F.Mohammed, T.R.Dafforn, S.Tenzer, M.Salim, P.Mahendra, C.Craddock, P.Van endert, H.Schild, M.Cobbold, V.H.Engelhard, P.A.Moss, B.E.Willcox.
Ref. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009, 106, 3889-3894. [DOI no: 10.1073/pnas.0900411106]
PubMed id 19234124
Note: In the PDB file this reference is annotated as "TO BE PUBLISHED". The citation details given above have been manually determined.
Abstract
T cell recognition of minor histocompatibility antigens (mHags) underlies allogeneic immune responses that mediate graft-versus-host disease and the graft-versus-leukemia effect following stem cell transplantation. Many mHags derive from single amino acid polymorphisms in MHC-restricted epitopes, but our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing mHag immunogenicity and recognition is incomplete. Here we examined antigenic presentation and T-cell recognition of HA-1, a prototypic autosomal mHag derived from single nucleotide dimorphism (HA-1(H) versus HA-1(R)) in the HMHA1 gene. The HA-1(H) peptide is restricted by HLA-A2 and is immunogenic in HA-1(R/R) into HA-1(H) transplants, while HA-1(R) has been suggested to be a "null allele" in terms of T cell reactivity. We found that proteasomal cleavage and TAP transport of the 2 peptides is similar and that both variants can bind to MHC. However, the His>Arg change substantially decreases the stability and affinity of HLA-A2 association, consistent with the reduced immunogenicity of the HA-1(R) variant. To understand these findings, we determined the structure of an HLA-A2-HA-1(H) complex to 1.3A resolution. Whereas His-3 is accommodated comfortably in the D pocket, incorporation of the lengthy Arg-3 is predicted to require local conformational changes. Moreover, a soluble TCR generated from HA-1(H)-specific T-cells bound HA-1(H) peptide with moderate affinity but failed to bind HA-1(R), indicating complete discrimination of HA-1 variants at the level of TCR/MHC interaction. Our results define the molecular mechanisms governing immunogenicity of HA-1, and highlight how single amino acid polymorphisms in mHags can critically affect both MHC association and TCR recognition.
Figure 3.
Crystallographic structure of HLA-A2-VLH at 1.3Å. (A) Overall structure of HLA-A2-VLH complex, with heavy chain (gray), β2m (cyan), and VLH peptide (blue) shown. (B) 2Fo-Fc electron density for the VLH peptide, with primary anchors and P3 to P5 highlighted. (C) Structure of the VLH mHag in the HLA-A2-antigen binding groove, with antigen-binding pockets A to F indicated, and VLH peptide surface indicated in green. The structure highlights relatively poor contacts with pockets E and F. (D) Orientation of H3 in and around the D pocket. H3 packs snugly against the walls of the D pocket, maintaining van der Waal's contacts with Tyr-159, Leu-156, and Gln-155, and also to Asp-4 of the peptide. It is also participates in a hydrogen-bonding network to Gln-155, and peptide residues Asp-4 and Asp-5, via ordered water molecules. Semitransparent peptide surface shown in green.
Figure 4.
Surface plasmon resonance analysis of TCR/HLA-A2-HA-1 interaction. (A) Specific binding of KP7 TCR to HLA-A2-VLH (solid line), with control (HLA-B7-TPR) and HLA-A2-VLR signals also shown (dashed and dotted lines, respectively). (B) Equilibrium affinity analysis of TCR/HLA-A2-VLH interaction. Scatchard plot is shown inset.
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers

 

spacer

spacer