 |
PDBsum entry 3csi
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
The anti-Cancer drug chlorambucil as a substrate for the human polymorphic enzyme glutathione transferase p1-1: kinetic properties and crystallographic characterisation of allelic variants.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
L.J.Parker,
S.Ciccone,
L.C.Italiano,
A.Primavera,
A.J.Oakley,
C.J.Morton,
N.C.Hancock,
M.L.Bello,
M.W.Parker.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2008,
380,
131-144.
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The commonly used anti-cancer drug chlorambucil is the primary treatment for
patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Chlorambucil has been shown to be
detoxified by human glutathione transferase Pi (GST P1-1), an enzyme that is
often found over-expressed in cancer tissues. The allelic variants of GST P1-1
are associated with differing susceptibilities to leukaemia and differ markedly
in their efficiency in catalysing glutathione (GSH) conjugation reactions. Here,
we perform detailed kinetic studies of the allelic variants with the aid of
three representative co-substrates. We show that the differing catalytic
properties of the variants are highly substrate-dependent. We show also that all
variants exhibit the same temperature stability in the range 10 degrees C to 45
degrees C. We have determined the crystal structures of GST P1-1 in complex with
chlorambucil and its GSH conjugate for two of these allelic variants that have
different residues at positions 104 and 113. Chlorambucil is found to bind in a
non-productive mode to the substrate-binding site (H-site) in the absence of
GSH. This result suggests that under certain stress conditions where GSH levels
are low, GST P1-1 can inactivate the drug by sequestering it from the
surrounding medium. However, in the presence of GSH, chlorambucil binds in the
H-site in a productive mode and undergoes a conjugation reaction with GSH
present in the crystal. The crystal structure of the GSH-chlorambucil complex
bound to the *C variant is identical with the *A variant ruling out the
hypothesis that primary structure differences between the variants cause
structural changes at the active site. Finally, we show that chlorambucil is a
very poor inhibitor of the enzyme in contrast to ethacrynic acid, which binds to
the enzyme in a similar fashion but can act as both substrate and inhibitor.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |