 |
PDBsum entry 3c7v
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrolase/hydrolase inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3c7v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structural insight into the kinetics and {delta}cp of interactions between tem-1 {beta}-Lactamase and {beta}-Lactamase inhibitory protein (blip).
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.Wang,
T.Palzkill,
D.C.Chow.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Biol Chem, 2009,
284,
595-609.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
In a previous study, we examined thermodynamic parameters for 20 alanine mutants
inbeta-lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) for binding to TEM-1 beta-lactamase.
Here we have determined the structures of two thermodynamically distinctive
complexes of BLIP mutants with TEM-1 beta-lactamase. The complex BLIP Y51A-TEM-1
is a tight binding complex with the most negative binding heat capacity change
(DeltaG = approximately -13 kcal mol(-1) and DeltaCp = approximately -0.8 kcal
mol(-1) K(-1)) among all of the mutants, whereas BLIP W150A-TEM-1 is a weak
complex with one of the least negative binding heat capacity changes (DeltaG =
approximately -8.5 kcal mol(-1) and DeltaCp = approximately -0.27 kcal mol(-1)
K(-1)). We previously determined that BLIP Tyr(51) is a canonical and Trp(150)
an anti-canonical TEM-1-contact residue, where canonical refers to the alanine
substitution resulting in a matched change in the hydrophobicity of binding free
energy. Structure determination indicates a rearrangement of the interactions
between Asp(49) of the W150A BLIP mutant and the catalytic pocket of TEM-1. The
Asp(49) of W150A moves more than 4 A to form two new hydrogen bonds while losing
four original hydrogen bonds. This explains the anti-canonical nature of the
Trp(150) to alanine substitution, and also reveals a strong long distance
coupling between Trp(150) and Asp(49) of BLIP, because these two residues are
more than 25 A apart. Kinetic measurements indicate that the mutations influence
the dissociation rate but not the association rate. Further analysis of the
structures indicates that an increased number of interface-trapped water
molecules correlate with poor interface packing in a mutant. It appears that the
increase of interface-trapped water molecules is inversely correlated with
negative binding heat capacity changes.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Analysis of interface-trapped water molecules. A, locations
of all the identified water molecules in the crystal structures
of Y51A-TEM-1 and of W150A-TEM-1 complexes. The complexes were
superposed using SUPERPOSE in the CCP4 package. TEM-1 is
represented as orange tubes, and the BLIP mutant is in green
schematic representation. Green CPK balls are the identified
water molecules from the AB complex of W150A-TEM-1 crystal
structure, and green dotted circles represent water molecules
from the CD complex. Red CPK balls are the identified water
molecules from the AB complex of Y51A-TEM-1 crystal structure,
and red dotted circles are the water molecules from the CD
complex of Y51A-TEM-1 crystal. B, locations of the identified
interfacial water molecules on the surface of the BLIP mutants.
The BLIP mutants are represented as molecular surfaces. The
interfacial water molecules are represented as red balls (for
the AB complex in the asymmetric unit) or as dotted spheres (for
the CD complex in the asymmetric unit). The W150A-TEM-1 complex
is at left, the wild type complex is at center, and to the right
is the Y51A-TEM-1 complex. C, histogram of the identified
electron density peaks within the BLIP mutant-TEM-1 interfaces.
The electron density peaks with B values less than 50 Å^2
are assigned as water.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Plot of the number of the selected intermolecular atom pairs
located within various distance ranges from the TEM-1 surface
versus the distance. Selection criterion is the shortest
intermolecular atom pairs for each BLIP atom. The solid thick
line with the square symbols indicates the intermolecular atom
pair distribution of the Y51A-TEM-1 complex that is 20% denser
than W150A-TEM-1 complex (thin line with circle symbols) at
∼3.6 Å.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2009,
284,
595-609)
copyright 2009.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |