spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 3c0v

Go to PDB code: 
Top Page protein ligands metals Protein-protein interface(s) links
Plant protein PDB id
3c0v
Contents
Protein chains
151 a.a.
Ligands
ZEA ×6
TBR ×5
EPE
Metals
_NA ×2
Waters ×578

References listed in PDB file
Key reference
Title Mad phasing using the (ta6br12)2+ cluster: a retrospective study.
Authors O.Pasternak, A.Bujacz, J.Biesiadka, G.Bujacz, M.Sikorski, M.Jaskolski.
Ref. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 2008, 64, 595-606. [DOI no: 10.1107/S0907444908007853]
PubMed id 18453695
Abstract
The crystal structure of cytokinin-specific binding protein (CSBP) containing four independent molecules with 4 x 155 = 620 residues in the asymmetric unit of the P6(4) unit cell has been solved by three-wavelength MAD using 1.8 angstroms resolution data recorded from a crystal derivatized with the dodecabromohexatantalum cation (Ta6Br12)2+. The diffraction data contained a very strong anomalous signal (allowing successful phasing even using peak SAD data alone) despite the fact that the five (Ta6Br12)2+ clusters found in the asymmetric unit have low occupancy (about 0.3). The derivative structure has been successfully refined to R = 0.158, providing interesting details on the geometry of the (Ta6Br12)2+ cluster, its interactions with the protein and on the backsoaking of a cytokinin ligand that was originally part of a CSBP-cytokinin complex in the native crystals used for (Ta6Br12)2+ derivatization. A simulation analysis of the phasing power of the (Ta6Br12)2+ ions at artificially imposed resolution limits shows that it is not possible to resolve the individual Ta atoms if the dmin limit of the data is higher than 2.9 angstroms. Additionally, for successful Ta identification the (Ta6Br12)2+ complex should be specifically bound and ordered. Good binding at the protein surface is facilitated by the presence of acidic groups, indicating higher pH buffer conditions to be preferable. In addition, the water channels in the crystal should be sufficiently wide (at least 11 angstroms) to allow free diffusion of the (Ta6Br12)2+ ions on soaking. A retrospective look at the initial molecular-replacement calculations provides interesting insights into how the peculiar packing mode and strong bias of the molecular-replacement-phased electron-density maps had hindered successful solution of the structure by this method.
Figure 4.
Figure 4 Anomalous difference map calculated for the best Ta[6]Br[12] cluster, TBR1, using phases generated by SOLVE and subsequent density modification for Ta-MAD data truncated at different d[min] levels: 1.8 Å (a), 2.6 Å (b) and 2.9 Å (c). The maps were contoured at levels of 18 for (a) and (c) or 6 for (b). (b) must be contoured at a lower level to emphasize its features or it would appear to be spherical. In (c), lowering of the contour level does not reveal any real features. The dark balls indicate the Ta positions located automatically by SOLVE.
Figure 6.
Figure 6 (Ta[6]Br[12])^2+-binding sites. The four CSBP molecules arranged as in the crystallographic asymmetric unit are coloured green (A), blue (B), red (C) and yellow (D). The (Ta[6]Br[12])^2+ clusters are marked using orange Ta spheres and violet Br spheres. (a) An overview of the relation between the four CSBP molecules and the five (Ta[6]Br[12])^2+ ions. The symmetry-related protein molecules that complete the (Ta[6]Br[12])^2+-binding sites have been omitted for clarity. (b) Close-up view of the binding details of two representative (Ta[6]Br[12])^2+ ions. The binding site of the TBR2 ion is shown on the left. The same interactions are observed for the TBR1 binding site. The binding site of the TBR4 ion is shown on the right. A similar environment is observed for TBR5. The amino-acid residues located in the vicinity of the (Ta[6]Br[12])^2+ ions are shown in stick representation.
The above figures are reprinted by permission from the IUCr: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr (2008, 64, 595-606) copyright 2008.
Secondary reference #1
Title Crystal structure of vigna radiata cytokinin-Specific binding protein in complex with zeatin.
Authors O.Pasternak, G.D.Bujacz, Y.Fujimoto, Y.Hashimoto, F.Jelen, J.Otlewski, M.M.Sikorski, M.Jaskolski.
Ref. Plant Cell, 2006, 18, 2622-2634.
PubMed id 16998071
Abstract
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers

 

spacer

spacer