 |
PDBsum entry 2q6h
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transport protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2q6h
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Antidepressant binding site in a bacterial homologue of neurotransmitter transporters.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
S.K.Singh,
A.Yamashita,
E.Gouaux.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nature, 2007,
448,
952-956.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Sodium-coupled transporters are ubiquitous pumps that harness pre-existing
sodium gradients to catalyse the thermodynamically unfavourable uptake of
essential nutrients, neurotransmitters and inorganic ions across the lipid
bilayer. Dysfunction of these integral membrane proteins has been implicated in
glucose/galactose malabsorption, congenital hypothyroidism, Bartter's syndrome,
epilepsy, depression, autism and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Sodium-coupled
transporters are blocked by a number of therapeutically important compounds,
including diuretics, anticonvulsants and antidepressants, many of which have
also become indispensable tools in biochemical experiments designed to probe
antagonist binding sites and to elucidate transport mechanisms. Steady-state
kinetic data have revealed that both competitive and noncompetitive modes of
inhibition exist. Antagonist dissociation experiments on the serotonin
transporter (SERT) have also unveiled the existence of a low-affinity allosteric
site that slows the dissociation of inhibitors from a separate high-affinity
site. Despite these strides, atomic-level insights into inhibitor action have
remained elusive. Here we screen a panel of molecules for their ability to
inhibit LeuT, a prokaryotic homologue of mammalian neurotransmitter sodium
symporters, and show that the tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) clomipramine
noncompetitively inhibits substrate uptake. Cocrystal structures show that
clomipramine, along with two other TCAs, binds in an extracellular-facing
vestibule about 11 A above the substrate and two sodium ions, apparently
stabilizing the extracellular gate in a closed conformation. Off-rate assays
establish that clomipramine reduces the rate at which leucine dissociates from
LeuT and reinforce our contention that this TCA inhibits LeuT by slowing
substrate release. Our results represent a molecular view into noncompetitive
inhibition of a sodium-coupled transporter and define principles for the
rational design of new inhibitors.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2: TCAs bind in the putative permeation pathway of LeuT.
F[o]–F[c] simulated annealing omit maps, both contoured at
3.0 ,
of clomipramine (a) and imipramine (b), in which the TCA was
omitted from the simulated annealing run and subsequent phase
calculation. The chlorine atom of clomipramine is green. c, LeuT
tilted 15°
from the membrane plane to illustrate the binding sites of
clomipramine and leucine, both depicted in space-filling
representation. Helices whose residues interact with
clomipramine are coloured. d, Electrostatic properties of the
LeuT extracellular-facing vestibule, with clomipramine
(yellow) cradled in the negatively charged crevice.
Electrostatic potential isocontours were set at +7 kT e^–1
(blue) and –7 kT e^–1 (red). EL4 is tinted green. To make
clomipramine more visible, LeuT has been tilted an additional
5°
towards the reader from the view in c ( 20°
from the membrane plane).
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3: Clomipramine-binding site. a, Stereo view, with
clomipramine and leucine carbon atoms depicted in yellow, sodium
ions in purple and two water molecules in red. Residues whose
interactions with clomipramine are hydrophobic, polar (Q34) or
ionic (D401) are coloured grey, orange and pink, respectively.
Atoms depicted as spheres interact through either a hydrogen
bond or a salt bridge. b, F[o]–F[c] simulated annealing omit
map, contoured at 3.0 ,
of D404 and R30, depicting the direct salt bridge between the
guanidium of R30 and the carboxylate of D404, with displacement
of two water molecules (compare to overlay in d). Distances
(Å) are shown along dashed lines. c, F[o]–F[c] simulated
annealing omit map, contoured at 3.0 ,
of the tip of EL4 (residues A317–N321), illustrating the
movement 'up' of A319 in the LeuT–clomipramine crystal
structure (compare to overlay in d). d, Same view as in a with
residues from the original LeuT structure (PDB ID 2A65) overlaid
(in green with two water molecules between D404 and R30 in cyan)
onto those from the LeuT–clomipramine crystal structure (in
pink with the two displaced waters in red and labelled as H[2]O
(CMI)). e, CPK rendering of clomipramine, R30 and F253
illustrating how the positively charged guanidium group is
sandwiched between the aromatic rings of clomipramine and F253.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature
(2007,
448,
952-956)
copyright 2007.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |