spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2pt2

Go to PDB code: 
Top Page protein ligands metals links
Metal transport PDB id
2pt2
Contents
Protein chain
316 a.a.
Ligands
SO4 ×4
EDO
Metals
FE2
Waters ×318

References listed in PDB file
Key reference
Title The structure of the iron-Binding protein, Futa1, From synechocystis 6803.
Authors N.Koropatkin, A.M.Randich, M.Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi, H.B.Pakrasi, T.J.Smith.
Ref. J Biol Chem, 2007, 282, 27468-27477. [DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M704136200]
PubMed id 17626019
Abstract
Cyanobacteria account for a significant percentage of aquatic primary productivity even in areas where the concentrations of essential micronutrients are extremely low. To better understand the mechanism of iron selectivity and transport, the structure of the solute binding domain of an ATP binding cassette iron transporter, FutA1, was determined in the presence and absence of iron. The iron ion is bound within the "C-clamp" structure via four tyrosine and one histidine residues. There are extensive interactions between these ligating residues and the rest of the protein such that the conformations of the side chains remain relatively unchanged as the iron is released by the opening of the metal binding cleft. This is in stark contrast to the zinc-binding protein, ZnuA, where the domains of the metal-binding protein remain relatively fixed, whereas the ligating residues rotate out of the binding pocket upon metal release. The rotation of the domains in FutA1 is facilitated by two flexible beta-strands running along the back of the protein that act like a hinge during domain motion. This motion may require relatively little energy since total contact area between the domains is the same whether the protein is in the open or closed conformation. Consistent with the pH dependence of iron binding, the main trigger for iron release is likely the histidine in the iron-binding site. Finally, neither FutA1 nor FutA2 binds iron as a siderophore complex or in the presence of anions, and both preferentially bind ferrous over ferric ions.
Figure 2.
FIGURE 2. The iron-binding environment in FutA1. The top stereo figure shows the electron density of iron bound to FutA1 and some of the contact residues, and the bottom stereo figure shows some of the secondary shell contacts with the ligating residues. The orientation here is similar to that in Fig. 1 with the N-terminal domain toward the bottom of the figure and looking into the iron binding pocket.
Figure 4.
FIGURE 4. Changes in the iron-binding site upon iron release. In this stereo figure the ligating residues in the iron bound FutA1 structure are represented by the transparent stick figures, and the apo form is represented by the solid structure. The two structures were aligned according to the N-terminal domain using the program MolView X (34).
The above figures are reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2007, 282, 27468-27477) copyright 2007.
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers

 

spacer

spacer