 |
PDBsum entry 2f78
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gene regulation
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2f78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Distinct effector-Binding sites enable synergistic transcriptional activation by benm, A lysr-Type regulator.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
O.C.Ezezika,
S.Haddad,
T.J.Clark,
E.L.Neidle,
C.Momany.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2007,
367,
616-629.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
BenM, a bacterial transcriptional regulator, responds synergistically to two
effectors, benzoate and cis,cis-muconate. CatM, a paralog with overlapping
function, responds only to muconate. Structures of their effector-binding
domains revealed two effector-binding sites in BenM. BenM and CatM are the first
LysR-type regulators to be structurally characterized while bound with
physiologically relevant exogenous inducers. The effector complexes were
obtained by soaking crystals with stabilizing solutions containing high effector
concentrations and minimal amounts of competing ions. This strategy, including
data collection with fragments of fractured crystals, may be generally
applicable to related proteins. In BenM and CatM, the binding of muconate to an
interdomain pocket was facilitated by helix dipoles that provide charge
stabilization. In BenM, benzoate also bound in an adjacent hydrophobic region
where it alters the effect of muconate bound in the primary site. A charge relay
system within the BenM protein appears to underlie synergistic transcriptional
activation. According to this model, Glu162 is a pivotal residue that forms
salt-bridges with different arginine residues depending on the occupancy of the
secondary effector-binding site. Glu162 interacts with Arg160 in the absence of
benzoate and with Arg146 when benzoate is bound. This latter interaction
enhances the negative charge of muconate bound to the adjacent primary
effector-binding site. The redistribution of the electrostatic potential draws
two domains of the protein more closely towards muconate, with the movement
mediated by the dipole moments of four alpha helices. Therefore, with both
effectors, BenM achieves a unique conformation capable of high level
transcriptional activation.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the BenM-EBD
effector-binding sites. (a) Muconate in the primary site.
Hydrogen bonds (between non-hydrogen atoms) to the effector are
shown as broken lines. The distance between the O1 of muconate
and the Arg146 N^ε atom is also shown (dash-dot). Helices,
colored as in Figure 2, are shown as cylinders. β-Strands were
omitted for clarity. (b) Benzoate in the secondary site. H1 is a
3[10]-helix associated with both binding sites. (c) Residues
implicated in the charge relay postulated to be responsible for
synergistic activation.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2007,
367,
616-629)
copyright 2007.
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #1
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Crystallization of the effector-Binding domains of benm and catm, Lysr-Type transcriptional regulators from acinetobacter sp. Adp1.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
T.Clark,
S.Haddad,
E.Neidle,
C.Momany.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 2004,
60,
105-108.
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |