 |
PDBsum entry 2ext
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RNA binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2ext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Rounding up: engineering 12-Membered rings from the cyclic 11-Mer trap.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.G.Heddle,
T.Yokoyama,
I.Yamashita,
S.Y.Park,
J.R.Tame.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Structure, 2006,
14,
925-933.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The protein TRAP (trp RNA binding attenuation protein) forms a highly
thermostable ring-shaped 11-mer. By linking in tandem two, three, or four DNA
sequences encoding TRAP monomers, we have engineered new rings that consist of
12 TRAP subunits and bind 12 ligand molecules. The hydrogen bonding pattern and
buried surface area within and between subunits are essentially identical
between the 11-mer and 12-mer crystal structures. Why do the artificial proteins
choose to make single 12-mer rings? The 12-mer rings are highly sterically
strained by their peptide linkers and far from thermostable. That proteins
choose to adopt a strained conformation of few subunits rather than an
unstrained one with 11 subunits demonstrates the importance of entropic factors
in controlling protein-protein interactions in general.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Crystal Structures of TRAP3 and TRAP4 Rings
Compared to Wild-Type TRAP Structures are shown as
molecular surface representations with each subunit or subunit
equivalent uniquely colored. (A) TRAP3, (B) TRAP4, and (C)
Wild-type B. stearothermophilus TRAP. The rings are shown both
along the rotation of molecular axis and perpendicular to it.
|
 |
Figure 8.
Figure 8. A Schematic Diagram Showing Possible Oligomeric
Forms of TRAP3 Protein Monomer equivalents are shown as
blue blocks, and their N and C termini equivalents are marked as
N and C respectively. The peptide linkers (Ala-Ala-Ala-Met)
shown in red connect the C-terminal residue of one monomer to
the N-terminal residue of the next. In wild-type TRAP, the N and
C termini lie at opposite faces of the ring, with the N-terminal
residue pointing into the cavity and the C-terminal residue
lying on the outer surface of the ring. The distance between the
last visible N- and C-terminal residues in the wild-type
structure (Ser5 and Lys73 respectively) is 37.8 Å. In
TRAP3 and TRAP4, peptide loops (not visible in the electron
density) connect the monomer equivalents as shown. (A) In the
12-mer ring form observed in the crystal, the peptide linkers
must cross from one face of the ring to the other, as shown by
the red lines. (B) An unstrained, imaginary form of TRAP3 in
which the peptide linkers lie parallel, so that their folded
domains (shown as blue blocks) can associate into three TRAP
11-mer rings essentially identical to wild-type TRAP rings,
giving the form shown in (C), the imaginary tube-like form of
TRAP3.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(2006,
14,
925-933)
copyright 2006.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |